Britain's most unreliable cars

In 2011, one in five cars failed its first MoT test. Japanese vehicles are best and French are worst!

When you drive away a new car, you get peace of mind from knowing that it won't need an MoT test for its first three years.

But once you hit the three-year mark, your vehicle needs a yearly check-up to make sure that it’s roadworthy and safe to drive. 

So what proportion of cars fail their first MoT test at three years old?

The answer is a fifth (20%), a level which seems disappointingly high to me. However, as you'd expect, some makes and models are less reliable than others. 

Indeed, a new survey from motoring website HonestJohn.co.uk found a wide variation in pass rates for first-time MoTs last year. Based on Honest John's data, these are the manufacturers to trust and those to avoid (based on motor manufacturers with at least 5,000 MoT tests in 2011): 

The UK's 15 most reliable car makes 

Manufacturer

No. of tests

Pass rate

Lexus

5,735

88%

Suzuki

20,548

86%

Honda

71,203

85%

SAAB

12,801

84%

Toyota

89,616

83%

Audi

77,773

83%

smart

5,185

83%

Mercedes-Benz

56,786

83%

Land Rover

30,048

82%

SEAT

22,412

81%

Mazda

41,085

81%

Hyundai

22,072

81%

Volkswagen

140,994

81%

Skoda

30,193

81%

BMW

88,620

81%

* Based on brands with more than 5,000 MoT Tests in 2011. 

The 15 car marques listed above are all above-average, as their pass rates exceed the UK average of 80%. 

Note that all three top places are taken by Japanese manufacturers: Lexus (88%), Suzuki (86%) and Honda (85%). In fourth place is Sweden's SAAB* (84%), followed by Toyota of Japan (83%) and then Audi of Germany (also 83%). 

Of these 15 reliable car brands, five are Japanese, another five are German, and there is one entry from each of the Czech Republic (Skoda, owned by VW), South Korea (Hyundai), Spain (SEAT, owned by VW), Sweden (SAAB) and the UK (Land Rover, owned by India's Tata Motors). 

Hence, if you're looking for a reliable car, then buy Japanese or German, as these two countries' manufacturers take 10 of our 15 top spots for reliability. 

Unlucky 13: the least reliable car makes

At the other end of the reliability scale lie these 'unlucky 13' car brands, all of which have average or below-average pass rates for first-time MoT Tests in 2011: 

Manufacturer

No. of tests

Pass rate

Kia

25,875

80%

Nissan

60,967

80%

Ford

267,727

79%

Jaguar

16,125

79%

Mitsubishi

12,224

79%

Vauxhall

266,653

79%

Volvo

26,447

78%

FIAT

48,632

77%

Peugeot

98,345

77%

Chevrolet

14,588

76%

Citroen

76,320

76%

MINI

33,762

76%

Renault

70,821

76%

* Based on brands with more than 5,000 MoT Tests in 2011.

Two brands -- Kia and Nissan -- offer average reliability by exactly the UK's overall pass rate of 80%. However, the remaining 11 marques are all below-average in terms of first-time pass rates. 

In last place -- and taking the wooden spoon -- are Renault, Citroen, MINI and Chevrolet, all four of which have the worst pass rate of 76%. Peugeot and FIAT also do badly at 77%, followed by Volvo at 78%. 

Ford, Jaguar, Mitsubishi and Vauxhall all have pass rates just below the 80% average, with all four brands achieving a 79% pass mark. 

Based on brand nationality, this list of sub-par cars contains four from the UK (Ford, Jaguar, MINI and Vauxhall; although all four are foreign-owned), three from France (Peugeot, Citroen and Renault) and two from Japan (Nissan and Mitsubishi). 

Of the remaining four, there is one each from Italy (FIAT), South Korea (Kia), Sweden (Volvo) and the US/South Korea (Chevrolet). 

Buy Japanese or German, but never French 

I used to work in the motor-finance trade, and what strikes me is how closely this statistical survey matches what industry insiders say. In particular, 'wise insiders' will tell you to buy German or Japanese cars for reliability, while avoiding French cars like la peste (the plague). 

What's more, this also closely reflects my own experiences as a car buyer. The most reliable car my wife has ever owned was her 1997 Volkswagen Polo, which was an absolute joy to drive and run. 

On the other hand, the absolute worst car my spouse has ever owned is her 2003 Renault Megane Scenic. While it scores well for its engine performance and driving comfort, her Renault has an awful record for electrical reliability. Indeed, we've spent thousands of pounds replacing faulty electrics since we bought my wife's Renault in 2004. 

So when we come to replace her car this year or next, my wife and I will take a couple of reliable Japanese brands for a spin, with Honda and Toyota at the top of our wish list. What's more, we have vowed never to buy another Renault! 

Finally, you can find the first-time MoT pass rates for 302 different makes and models of car -- which range from 93% for a classy Rolls-Royce Phantom to an appalling 59% for a Chrysler Grand Voyager -- at the Honest John website here

How reliable is your car? Would you buy the same make and/or model again? Please tell us in the comments box below! 

More: Get quality quotes for car insurance | Why your car insurance is still too expensive | How to beat parking fines

* SAAB is currently in receivership.

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.