2013's most reliable cars

If you want to buy a car that won't let you down, a new Which? survey finds Japanese-made models are the most reliable overall.
The latest Which? Car Survey has revealed the most reliable cars of 2013.
This year over 47,500 Which? members were surveyed and just under 58,000 vehicles were put under the microscope to find the most dependable cars across eight car classes.
The categories encompassed superminis, MPVs and 4x4s as well as medium, large, luxury, estate, and sports cars.
Japanese makes were voted top in six out of eight car classes for cars up to three years old as well as for those over the average three-year warranty-hill.
Calculating reliability
Which? worked out the reliability score for each car maker by looking at the number of breakdowns and faults suffered by all models in the past 12 months.
The more serious the fault and the longer it kept a car off the road, the bigger weighting it was given.
The scores for each area were then combined to provide an overall reliability score for each manufacturer.
Lastly the results were split into cars up to three years old and those over the three-year warranty period and ordered from most reliable to least in each sector.
The most reliable car of 2013
The 2005 Peuguot 107 topped the Which? dependability chart this year, with the petrol version of the supermini chalking up an almost faultless score of 99% - the best out of all eight classes for cars up to three years old.
The 107 cost an owner just £4 on average in annual repair bills and had no breakdowns reported.
For cars over the average three-year warranty honeymoon Japanese supermini the Toyota iQ scored a respectable 97.2% for reliability.
The 2008 petrol range cost just £1 on average in repair costs.
The make scored badly last year because of recalls but this year it has topped the charts.
Top in each class
Here are the most reliable cars up to three years old that Which? found in each class.
Car class |
Most reliable up to three years old |
Fuel type |
Score |
Supermini |
Peugeot 107 (2005-) |
Petrol |
99% |
Medium |
Toyota Auris Hybrid (2010-2013) |
Hybrid |
98% |
Large |
Honda Insight (2009-) |
Hybrid |
97.6% |
Luxury |
Audi A6 (2004-2011) |
All |
95.3% |
Estate |
Toyota Avensis Tourer (2009-) |
Petrol |
97.8% |
MPV |
Toyota Verso-S (2011-) |
All |
96.2% |
4x4/SUV |
Nissan Qashqai (2007-) |
Petrol |
96.1% |
Sport |
Mazda MX-5 (2005-) |
All |
97.4% |
Two out of the eight categories are topped by eco-friendly Hybrid cars.
While six of the top reliable models are Japanese: Honda, Toyota, Mazda and Nissan are all Japanese car makers.
The Toyato Avensis Tourer and the Mazda MX-5 both had a 0% breakdown rate and £0 average annual repair cost.
For comparison here are the most reliable cars over three years old that were found via the Which survey.
Car class |
Most reliable car over three years old |
Fuel type |
Score |
Supermini |
Toyota iQ (2008-) |
Petrol |
97.2% |
Medium |
Mazda3 (2009-) |
Petrol |
91.9% |
Large |
Toyota Prius (2009-) |
Hybrid |
94.3% |
Luxury |
Lexus GS (2005-2012) |
All |
85.7% |
Estate |
Honda Accord Tourer (2003-2008) |
Petrol |
95.3% |
MPV |
Honda FR"V (2004-2009) |
Petrol |
92.8% |
4x4/SUV |
Toyota RAV4 (2006-2013) |
Petrol |
92.6% |
Sport |
BMW 1 Series Convertible (2008-) |
All |
91.9% |
The most unreliable car of 2013
So, which car manufacturers should you avoid if you don’t want to spend hours on the hard shoulder and hundreds of pounds on car repairs?
Well the worst car overall was in the large car class in the form of the Peugeot 407 which scored a terrible 47.6% for reliability.
The average cost of repairing one of the 2004-2011 range was £391 according to the Which? survey and the average time off the road amounted to 2.26 days.
The 2009 Volkswagen Polo attracted a score of 76.8% - the lowest out of all the cars looked at under three years old.
The diesel model had a 12% breakdown rate which was one of the highest in the supermini class. According to Which? members the cause was exhaust and electronic control unit problems.
Worst in each class
We’ve seen the shining examples of car manufacturing so now let’s take a look at the makes and models to avoid in each class for cars up to three years old.
Car class |
Most unreliable car up to three years old |
Fuel type |
Score |
Supermini |
Volkswagen Polo (2009-) |
Diesel |
76.8% |
Medium |
Vauxhall Astra (2009-) |
Diesel |
81.3% |
Large |
Mercedes C-class (2007-) |
Diesel |
81.6% |
Luxury |
Audi A5 Sportback (2009-) |
All |
89.7% |
Estate |
Vauxhall Insignia Sport Tourer (2009-) |
All |
75.5% |
MPV |
Peugeot 3008 (2009-) |
All |
79.9% |
4x4/SUV |
Mitsubishi ASX (2010-) |
All |
83.9% |
Sport |
Smart ForTwo Cabriolet (2007-)** |
All |
80.2% |
The most unreliable cars over three years old scored much worse as you can see in the table below.
Car class |
Most unreliable car over three years old |
Fuel type |
Score |
Supermini |
Peugeot 206 (1998-2009) |
All |
64.6% |
Medium |
Renault Mégane (2002-2009) |
Diesel |
66.7% |
Large |
Peugeot 407 (2004-2011) |
All |
47.6% |
Luxury |
Jaguar S-type (1999-2007) |
All |
76.2% |
Estate |
Peugeot 407 SW (2004-2010) |
All |
61% |
MPV |
Vauxhall Za!ira (2005-) |
Diesel |
59.2% |
4x4/SUV |
Land Rover Discovery 3 (2004-2009) |
All |
53.8% |
Sport |
Renault Mégane CC (2002-2010) |
All |
68.2% |
More on cars:
25 ways to cut your car insurance
Official: the worst (and best) cars to own
The cheapest cars to insure for young drivers
Most Recent
Comments
-
Thank you very much for the information. I'm very interested in car reliability. Now I have a Toyota Corolla. With French cars always problems. Kind Regards, Staf ANDRIES
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
@oldhenry Rolls Royce aero engines are not made by the Japanese or Koreans and are the best in the world so your comment is a direct insult to the quality of British manufacturing which is now well up to any Japanese standards. The current build quality of Jaguar Land Rover is stunning by comparison with any quality car manufacturer building highly complex vehicles and UK Toyota and Nissan plants ship top end models to Japan where they are regarded as premium quality. Volkswagen reliability is all hype, the cars may not leave you stranded but numerous replacements of 'wearing' parts will empty your wallet
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Land Rovers are not reliable because they are not built by the Japanese, or Koreans. The standard of care in a build is everything. LR owners seem not to bother whether they will get them home or not, bizarre. Not all Germans stuff is wondeful. My Transported van's , as a camper, engine expired at 100,000 miles which I though pathetic. Transit engines doing two ot three times that. The body was better than Ford , but rusted out round the windows as a design fault trapped water. Cars are built to a price, Ford seem to be middle of the road, but ignore their daft list prices that no one pays. I now have a Ford and a Kia , the latter with a 7 year warranty . I hope I never need it though. The last time I broke down at side of road was in the VW camper when the electrical water pump, a back up to the main one as it was a turbo, leaked and lost the coolant, realyed home and I ordered a new one at £140! Easy to fit though, as was a turbo at 140,000 miles.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
25 July 2021