Top

Are you fed up with banking breakdowns?


Updated on 27 July 2012 | 9 Comments

As NatWest and Nationwide reveal more IT glitches, we ask what's wrong with Britain's banks.

Thanks to IT problems, this summer has not been a good one for customers of British banks. 

Six weeks ago ago, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) caused havoc when a software upgrade went awry. This upgrade became a dreadful downgrade, as it locked millions of customers out of their accounts with RBS, NatWest and Northern Ireland-based Ulster Bank. In total, up to 17 million people were affected. 

Computer says no 

Unbelievably, NatWest has now had yet another computer meltdown, as we revealed yesterday in Double IT trouble from NatWest and Nationwide BS. As complaints poured into Twitter and Facebook, NatWest admitted that it was having problems processing payments by debit card and with online banking. 

What's more, Nationwide BS also experienced IT problems yesterday. The UK's biggest building society double-debited a swathe of card transactions. The mutual dipped twice into customers' current accounts, with payments made on Tuesday duplicated on Wednesday. According to reports, close to 705,000 customers were affected by this double trouble. 

Too big to function? 

Of course, this isn't the first time that UK banks have fouled up. Indeed, every large British bank has had its fair share of software slip-ups. 

For instance, a couple of years ago, Abbey debited payments twice after an IT worker accidentally fed the same tape through its system a second time. Similarly, Barclays' online-banking system crashed twice in two weeks, leaving customers unable to log into their accounts. 

Then again, recent banking blunders have been particularly severe -- leading some to ask whether there is a growing defect or instability in the British banking system. In the banking collapse of late 2008, we worried that some banks were TBTF: 'Too Big To Fail'. Today, I wonder whether UK banks are still TBTF, but this is now short for 'Too Big To Function'? 

What could be causing these widespread problems? Having worked in financial services for 25 years and studied computing at degree level, here are my thoughts: 

Concentration: The Big Four banks (Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and RBS) control about five-sixths (85%) of all retail-banking customers. Clearly, this concentration of customers creates complexity and, probably, instability.

Cost cutbacks: Since the UK's credit-fuelled boom ended five years ago, tens of thousands of bank workers have lost their jobs. Perhaps our banks have gone beyond 'lean and mean' and are now 'skinny and hacked off'?

Offshoring: To cut back on costs, large UK corporations outsource customer services and IT functions to low-cost labour markets in English-speaking countries such as India and the Philippines. While this income is of huge benefit to developing countries, UK customers repeatedly complain of falling standards.

Staff stresses: Staff cutbacks place ever-greater strain on bank workers, leading to intense pressure on the remaining employees and contributing to high staff turnover.

Lack of training: As older bank employees leave or retire, their valuable experience is lost as they are replaced by younger, lower paid and less experienced workers.

Poorly planned upgrades: New software should never be tested in a live environment, as the consequences are often disastrous. It seems that in their rush to return to profit, banks are upgrading and revamping their systems without proper prior testing.

Human error: Lastly, we should never forget one of the main causes of corporate cock-ups: old-fashioned human error! 

Monitor your money 

Given all the problems of the last few years, we should all keep a closer eye on our accounts. 

For example, checking your monthly statements against your receipts and regular bills is a simple way to monitor your money. 

A more high-tech approach is to sign up for online banking and download transaction data for regular reviews. Similarly, mobile banking with warning text messages can be very useful. 

One thing you shouldn't do is be complacent. As soon as you see an unfamiliar, odd or suspicious transaction on your account, contact your bank straight away. It may be nothing more than an oversight or a one-off glitch, but could be the start of a much bigger problem, such as a wider IT crash or targeted fraud. 

The itch to switch 

Given recent banking bungles, it's no surprise that some customers have had enough and are ditching and switching banks. Unfortunately, all major UK banks have suffered similar snags at some point in time, with no bank immune from these howlers. 

As a financial writer of 10 years' standing, I can't think of a single bank that has generated no complaints from readers. That said, I can personally vouch for first direct, which I've banked with for over two decades and recommend highly. This widely admired division of HSBC will even give you £100 to join it

Other banks with good reputations for customer service include The Co-operative Bank and its online bank, Smile. At the other end of this scale, Santander and Bank of Scotland tend to do poorly in Which? magazine's yearly satisfaction ratings. 

Finally, if you're fed up and looking to switch banks, then read Alternatives to current accounts with the big banks and OFT launches new current account review before making a move. 

Good luck with finding a better bank! 

More: Compare cracking current accounts | National Savings is failing savers | The best and worst energy bills

Most Recent


Comments



  • 30 July 2012

    These are not minor glitches. As an IT professional, I am very concerned by the length of time that some of these systems have been down for and the lack of explanation. These issues are serious enough for Parliament to be taking an interest. As for reading a tape twice, (do the banks still use tape?) we had very simple software controls in place to prevent this from happening when I was programming thirty years ago. I cannot believe that in today's security conscious environment anybody would have designed a system that allowed a baby error of this type to be missed or that systems testing would be so sloppy as not to have tested for it. If true, this represents a failure at every level from analysis and design, through governance and into systems testing, user testing and security testing, Either we are being lied to or this is symptomatic of a failure in IT competence right across the board. The fact that millions of accounts that happened to have transactions on one file were affected does not particularly bother me. Modern systems contain volume. The fact that such a predictable and simple error was not designed out of the system does.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 30 July 2012

    Literally hundreds of banks in the USA, Canada, Australia and elsewhere have offshored IT operations to India, Philippines and elsewhere, and are running quite fine for close to a decade, so offshoring alone can't explain why British banks should go through these problems. Each of the Top 5 banks in India handles more volumes - in terms of number of accounts, transactions, etc. - than the largest of British banks but without similar catastrophes, so high volume alone can't be held responsible either. On the other hand, a couple of years ago, a leading British bank reportedly went live with a major payments program without allowing for adequate end-to-end testing because introducing that crucial step in the project plan would have delayed the go-live date and resulted in diminished bonuses for the senior executivies involved with the program. Based on my limited knowledge, I think stuarte above has nailed the real culprit for the recent spate of problems with British banking IT.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 28 July 2012

    Whilst hacking may always be an issue (see PeterMcGregor comment) I remember back when e-commerce started in the UK (mid/late 90's) & the then chairman of Barclays admitted that they couldn't validate every transaction in real time (even then!!) as their infrastructure couldn't handle it - they had spent too much money lending to dodgy 3rd world countries in the 80's onwards (the loans that Bob Geldof etc got them to write off) and hadn't invested in modern systems. Couple that with comments that have recently leaked from RBS and friends of mine who have worked at RBS IT about the massive layoffs and management forcing shortcuts (no testing or ability to rollback - things that you'd sack a trainee for!!!) and there is a very obvious accident just waiting to happen........ Personally its just a load more reasons why any management bonuses should be a thing of the past until they sort many many things out.......

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.