Government plans to cut feed-in tariffs 'flawed'


Updated on 22 December 2011 | 3 Comments

High Court rules that reduction in amount households paid for solar-generated electricity is "legally flawed".

The High Court has ruled that the Government’s plans to cut the feed-in tariffs (FiTs) homeowners can receive for selling electricity they have generated via solar photovoltaic panels are “legally flawed”.

Friends of the Earth and solar power companies Solarcentury and HomeSun challenged the proposals.

They argued that the Government’s decision to hold a consultation period on the changes that ran until after the deadline for qualifying installations was unlawful. The High Court has now backed that position.

The high take-up for the scheme and the falling cost of solar panels has led to the Government cutting the FiT from 43.3p to 21p per kilowatt hour (p/kWh) of electricity. This lower rate was to come into effect from April 2012 for panels installed after 12 December this year.

But the consultation remains open until 23 December.

Climate Change Minister Greg Barker said the Government will appeal the decision.

The Government is also consulting on proposals that homes that do not have an Energy Perfomance Certificate (EPC) rating of level C or above will only receive 9p/kWh.

Friends of the Earth claims that the reduction in the FiT will lead to 29,000 job losses and £230 million a year in lost tax income for the Treasury.

It's asking the Government to come up with new proposals that would allow solar payments to fall in line with reduced installation costs. And it also wants some of the money the Treasury makes from the scheme to be allocated to low income households to help them install panels.

Big increase in up-front costs

The court ruling was followed by a damning report by the Environmental Audit Committee and Energy and Climate Change Committee. It said that the changes to FiTs could have a “fatal impact” on the solar industry.

It also warned that requiring homes to have a minimum EPC rating of level C or above would mean 86% of homes would have to improve their insulation before qualifying. It estimates that increase the up-front costs of solar panels from £5,600 to £14,000.

MP Tim Yeo, Chairman of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, said: “Ministers should have spotted the solar gold rush much earlier. That way subsidy levels could have been reduced in a more orderly way without delivering such a shock to the industry.”

Consumer Focus says that registration for the scheme needs to be improved so it starts on the day people sign their contract, not when all the paperwork is received.

More: Free solar panels: The small print exposedGas costs, not green measures, to blame for energy prices

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.