Taxman clamping down on Inheritance Tax!

Revenue & Customs made an extra £70m in Inheritance Tax last year querying property valuations. Don't get caught out!
Over the last year, HM Revenue & Customs launched 9,368 separate investigations into Inheritance Tax valuations. This basically means that they queried the valuations of properties which were included in the estates of the deceased.
And these investigations proved pretty lucrative – they raised an additional £70m in tax, the equivalent of around £24,600 per case in those instances where additional tax was found to be payable.
So how does the taxman go about these valuations?
Valuing a property
Inheritance Tax is charged when you leave an estate worth in excess of £325,000 (or £650,000 for couples). With house prices having grown so exponentially over the past decade, it’s the value of the property left behind after you die that is in many cases the deciding factor as to whether you will need to stump up the 40% in Inheritance Tax.
Related how-to guide

Cut your tax bill by thousands
Tax may be an inevitable fact of life, but there’s no reason to pay more than you have to!
See the guideThe idea is that the taxman wants to see that you have taken ‘reasonable care’ to get an accurate valuation. Additional questions to ensure that due care has been taken may also be asked, covering whether the valuer’s attention was drawn to particular features of the property (such as development potential) or whether anything unusual about the valuation was questioned.
And failing to take ‘reasonable care’ can be costly – HMRC can fine the estate and its beneficiaries up to 100% of the additional tax liability, on top of the additional tax due.
So for undervaluing a property by £20,000, you could end up forking out £16,000 in due tax and fines.
Clearly being vigilant about the property’s value is important, but there are things you can do well in advance of death to ensure that your Inheritance Tax bill is as small as possible.
Leave it to charity
In the Budget earlier this year, the Government announced a reduced rate of Inheritance Tax for those people who leave 10% of their estate to charity.
So instead of handing over 40% in tax, you’ll only have to pay 36%. In reality, this won’t leave your loved ones any better off, as the money will simply be going to charitable causes rather than the taxman. But if you trust that charity to use your cash a little more wisely than the Treasury, then it might be worth considering.
Life insurance
When you take out a life insurance policy, the idea is that your family benefit from the entire payout. They can then use that money to pay off the mortgage, pay for the kids’ university costs, just generally use that money to cover for the missing salary once you’re gone.
Related blog post
- John Fitzsimons writes:
Parents, give your child a decent retirement!
Guest blogger John Lawson of Standard Life looks at whether parents should consider paying into pensions for their children.
Read this post
There is a way round this, and that is to have your policy written into trust. That way your policy is treated as being separate from the rest of your estate, meaning the cash is paid quicker, and will not be taxed.
For more on this, be sure to have a read of Save your family thousands in taxes.
Get gifting
The taxman allows us all a number of gift limits which we can make each year, without having to pay any Inheritance Tax on them.
So, for example, all of us can give away £3,000 in financial gifts. And if you don’t use up your full allocation this year, next year you can give away £6,000.
On top of that general allocation, there are a number of more specific gift allowances. So parents can give their children £5,000 each as wedding gifts, while grandparents can hand over £2,500 and general friends can make a gift of £1,000.
You can also give regular gifts out of your salary, so long as they do not inhibit your current lifestyle. So for example, regular payments to someone and regular gifts for birthdays or anniversaries are exempt.
Exempt beneficiaries
Who you hand your cash over to can also make a difference as to whether or not it should be subject to Inheritance Tax.
If you gift money over to any of the following, whether in life or in your will, the gifts will be exempt of tax.
- Your spouse or civil partner, so long as they have a permanent home in the UK.
- A qualifying charity.
- Certain national institutions, such as museums, universities and the National Trust.
- Any UK political party that has at least two elected members of the House of Commons, or one member but the party received at least 150,000 votes.
The seven-year rule
Perhaps the most important rule of all, which overrides all of the above, is that any gift you make to an individual is exempt from Inheritance Tax, so long as you live for another seven years after making the gift. These are known as ‘potentially exempt’ transfers.
However, should you give away an asset but retain an interest in it – for example, you give your house to your children, but continue to live there – this gift will not be potentially exempt.
More: Get a life insurance quote | The £3.2bn pension boost | House price indices are a waste of time
Most Recent
Comments
-
The last Labour government famously failed to raise the threashold of this tax during the first ten odd years of their administration. They only stopped this process when a big fuss was made ahead of an important election. But why did they erode it in the first place? The tax was brought in at the start of the 20th century to break up the massive holdings of the aristocratic magnates, which were acting as a brake on wealth generation, so why would Labour want to impose it on the ordinary person? Surely, the Labour party is the party of the ordinary man and woman, why would they wish to apply this tax to them? The problem goes back to Maggie T, who lowered the ladder and allowed oiks to better themselves by their own efforts. This meant that there was less of a constituency for Labour politicians. After all why would you vote for a socialist solution to your problems if you could better youself? The result was "New Labour", who on gaining power set about hauling the ladder up again. Maggie had sold off council housing to oiks. How dare oiks own their own houses?!!! Don't they realise that they should abide in houses with sky blue, sahara yellow or pillar box red doors and be pathetically grateful for the bounty of being allowed to do so? Apart from this moral outrage, council house sales didn't upset Labour too much, because the capital the oiks possessed was tied up in the roof over their heads, so it wasn't free capital, it didn't give the oiks freedom of action. But then disaster, these oiks started to die off, and their houses were sold, and the money went to their descendents (the children of oiks are also oiks) and these second generation oiks were getting free capital. They could invest it. They might become (gasp) middle class. Labour was determined to try and put a stop to such a process. So each year they let the IHT threashold erode so that eventually they would be able to hobble the families of those class traitors who had availed themselves of Tory largess. This is the reason why the ordinary person is now subject to this tax - it is the result of the vindictiveness and mean-spiritedness of a government which betrayed its constituency, the very people it claimed it existed to help, and thereby earned for itself and its parliamentary supporters the title "the Party of Evil".
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
David Cameron says he Avocates and the government support an enterprise society. To what ends I ask? The concern is Gt. Britains response to the economic crisis is lethargic. Can you wonder at it. Some marketering government this is turning out to be! The majority won't sign up for serfdom. .
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Best thing to do - once retired, sell up, move to a smaller place, set your kids up with some of the profit and enjoy life with the rest, as for the Tax man - he can go to hell!
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
22 June 2011