How to copy Starbucks and pay no tax

Creating your own company could mean dodging tax like US corporations. Here's how this scheme works.
Last week, coffee giant Starbucks got a roasting when a four-month investigation by news agency Reuters revealed that its British division has paid hardly any UK corporation tax.
Starbucks arrived in the UK in May 1998 and, over the next 14 years, racked up sales exceeding £3 billion. However, thanks to some ace accounting, Starbucks UK has paid just £8.6 million in corporation tax.
Normally, such a low tax bill would indicate a struggling business, even one in terminal decline. On the contrary, Starbucks is growing fast, adding 20-30 new outlets each year to its existing portfolio of 735 stores. So what's going on?
Playing 'pass the profits'
Starbucks has huge sales and hefty profit margins, so why isn't it paying UK corporation tax? The simple answer is that its parent company heavily reduces Starbucks' UK tax liability through massive deductions.
For example, Starbucks UK is entirely financed by debt from its US parent, to which it pays millions of pounds a year in tax-deductible interest. Also, 6% of Starbucks' sales are paid to its parent in royalty fees for using its brand, trademarks and intellectual property. In 2011, these royalties came to £26 million, helping to push the UK arm to a loss and completely avoid tax.
Of course, Starbucks is just one of scores of multinational corporations to game the UK tax system. Amazon, Facebook and Google use similar legal loopholes to transfer British profits to low-tax regimes, as we highlighted in Why I'm boycotting Amazon and where I'm going instead.
What if you could do the same? How would such a wheeze work and how low could your tax bill go?
Transform yourself into a company
Perhaps the best way to take total control of your tax affairs is to 'incorporate'. This involves setting yourself up in business as a private limited company and channelling all (or most) of your income through your own 'personal tax haven'.
By starting your own company, you can move away from being taxed as an employee and paying income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) through the PAYE (Pay As You Earn) system. Instead, your company get taxed on its profits after legitimate business expenses.
Meanwhile, to avoid income tax and NICs, you take a modest salary from your firm and boost your earnings with tax-efficient share dividends. Here's a practical example of how this works.
Make work less taxing
Let's assume that your company collects, say, £60,000 a year in fees from various clients. Of this, your business pays you a small salary of £107 a week, or £5,564 a year. As this is below the lower threshold for employee NICs, you pay no National Insurance on this wage. In addition, there is no income tax to pay on this mini-salary, as it falls within your personal tax allowance of £8,105.
Next, assume that your company has 1,000 shares, all of which you own. Every six months, you declare a cash dividend on these shares of, say, exactly £1.8455 per share. This gives you an extra £18,455 twice a year, which totals £36,910.
Share dividends are taxed much more lightly than earned income. In fact, thanks to a notional 10% tax credit, basic-rate (20%) taxpayers pay no tax on dividends. For higher-rate (40%) taxpayers, the tax is 32.5%, reduced to 22.5% after the 10% notional tax credit. However, this extra tax is paid only on the slice of dividends in the higher-rate tax threshold, which starts at £34,370 of taxable earnings.
In effect, you've received total earnings of £42,474 from the £60,000 paid to your private company. As all of this falls below the threshold for higher-rate tax of £42,475, it is entirely tax-free. In short, the score is: you 100%, HM Revenue & Customers (HMRC) 0%!
Make your company pay
While you pay zero personal taxes on the above earnings, HMRC will get its pound of flesh one way or another. It does this by charging your company corporation tax. In the above example, your company received £60,000 over the course of a year and paid you a salary of £5,564. This sum is offset against corporation tax, reducing the company profit to £54,436.
Although dividends don't reduce this profit any further, all legitimate business expenses do. For the sake of argument, let's say that your company offsets £4,436 in expenses against tax, reducing the final profit to £50,000.
The standard rate of corporation tax for small businesses is 20%, thus generating a tax bill of £10,000. This is the only tax paid by your company (except for VAT on purchases, of course).
What's more, your company is solvent, as it has spare cash remaining of £3,090, as follows:
Revenues |
£60,000 |
Salary |
-£5,564 |
Dividends |
-£36,910 |
Expenses |
-£4,436 |
Corporation tax |
-£10,000 |
Surplus |
£3,090 |
A river of red tape
Of course, not everyone can set up a company and start a business overnight. If you quit your job and return to the same firm as a consultant paid via your own private company, HMRC might take a dim view of this move. It could argue that you are an "employee at arm's length" and, under the provisions of an anti-avoidance rule known as IR35, could order you to pay tax as an employee.
Then again, if you're a genuine consultant or freelancer (as I am), then this sort of tax arrangement should be right up your street. Indeed, I ran my small business along these lines for six years, before overwhelming red tape and a bout of ill-health led me to become self-employed, rather than a company director.
Finally, if you do decide to set up your own company, then be prepared to be washed over by a flood of British bureaucracy. You must keep accurate records for HMRC and Companies House and, if you fail to file your company paperwork and pay its taxes on time, then expect to be fined thousands of pounds. Even so, this entirely legal tax loophole might work for you, as it does for millions of British workers.
More on tax:
Beware this tax scam
Eight top tax return tips
Tax havens and tax hells
The true cost of having a company car
How to get a tax refund
Would you use a tax avoidance scheme?
Ten ways to avoid Capital Gains Tax
Most Recent
Comments
-
Great idea Tanni, lets rebuild the empire, go back to the class system of old and rule the world again!
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
@r what type of new government do you have in mind? the ones we have been subjected to,all appear to have some kind of university attendance history,which we assume is supplying the best qualified leaders for the job.. could this culture they learn within these establishments be the root of the problem? as none either left or right appear to be able to solve what amounts to the running of a household budget,,albeit a rather large one..when they have been let out but are quite adept at as you say lining ones own pockets.. oh and blaming the previous,supposedly best qualified learned gentlemen/women for the growing problems stacking up..power to the people i say..the university education is obviously not working..ready for the revolution when you are..
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
@edwardmk2879: That's one of the most sensible suggestions that I have heard on here. I have said for years that we need a new type of government - we need to get away from the traditional "left" and "right" wing politics because that is now tainted. We have seen numerous examples in the last 10 years alone of MPs and euro MPs with their noses in the trough. We have seen that our prime politicians end up with cream jobs and pensions in the EU after they lose office here. All of this taints their decisions even further. We do need to balance our books. We can do it as well. It can be done by cutting out unproductive expenditure - such as the near £54,000,000 our government gave to the EU [I] every day of the year in 2011/12[/I] - such as eliminating uncontrolled immigration - such as the wasteful foreign aid policy that gives money away without ensuring that it is needed or even gets to its destination. Government is massive - I am sure there are complete departments that are unproductive, outdated and could be removed. We need to set up the state pension scheme properly with personal accounts that are topped up by tax relief (as now) and support for when we are not working or are incapacitated. This will take 40 years to achieve in its entireity but, at that point, the state pension will no longer be a massive demand on the government. I believe it takes about 40% of the Social Service budget at the moment. Similarly, civil servants, the fire service and the police would have to fund thier pension budgets as well. Back to the topic. @tanni: some nice points but tax accounting has never involved ethics - it uses the letter of the law. Corporation tax is now antiquated because it cannot be applied to global companies - they will move their cash about to a cheaper place - so it disproportionally penalises the UK only company. It is a tax that cannot be applied as intended and is, therefore, a bad tax. @gfourmoney and @minniedaminx made some good points - maybe we need to change our focus from taxing income to taxing spending. Large corporations will not be able to avoid UK tax so easily. Obviously, our benefits system will need to be reviewed but that is not impossible. When will this happen? If our successive governments and, indeed, the western world, continue to produce money by QE, it will be forced on us because QE reduces debt by reducing the value of OUR savings and OUR pensions. One day, there will be a revolution! We need new thinking now. r.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
21 November 2012