Mums, you're risking your children's future

More than half of British mums don't have life insurance. But it won't be them that suffer as a result...
It’s fair to say that my son’s arrival in January has changed my life. Out has gone football, beer and TV. In has come nappies, Incy Wincy Spider (including the actions) and lullabies.
Financially there has been a significant effect too (and not just the amount I spend each week on milk). There has been planning for his financial future, as I explained in What to do with your child’s savings, while the launch of Junior ISAs has further confused matters.
But my wife and I have also had to think about what happens if anything happens to either of us...
An important protection, ignored
In our case, thankfully we already had life insurance in place, which we arranged when we bought our house two years ago. But an awfully large number of parents are not protecting their lives – and it’s their children that pay as a result.
Related how-to guide

Slash your insurance costs
If you’re feeling the pinch, these ways of saving money on your insurance will help.
See the guideA survey by Legal & General last month found that an astonishing 51% of mothers do not have any life insurance in place. I know it’s a bit morbid, and nobody really wants to think about dying, but this really isn’t the sort of thing you should be burying your head in the sand about.
Who needs life cover?
Not everyone needs life insurance of course. If you’re single, have no children and live in a rented property, chances are life insurance is a needless luxury.
To work out whether life insurance is necessary in your case, you just need to ask a simple question – if you died tomorrow, would anyone suffer financially?
If you are a parent, the answer is almost certainly yes. And that means you need life insurance.
Don’t forget the housewives
When answering that question, it’s easy to focus on working parents. After all, there is an obvious financial impact if they are no longer around, with their monthly salary disappearing.
But that doesn’t mean that non-working parents should ignore life insurance.
After all, non-working parents perform plenty of roles that would ordinarily need to be paid for, like childcare or general chores around the house. If the non-working parent passed away, the costs could soon mount up, so even if you are a housewife (or a lucky househusband), life insurance is probably still a necessity.
Other priorities
What’s interesting is that many of us know that we are leaving ourselves exposed by not utilising such protection.
Aviva’s Family Finances Report earlier this year found that an incredible 93% of families knew they did not have adequate financial protection. And yet, if they were given a £50 a month pay rise, a paltry 2% would put that money towards life insurance.
Jane Baker explains why life insurance should be your number one financial priority
Even if they were on the receiving end of a far more significant windfall of £10,000, the families responding to the survey had other priorities before protecting their loved ones. Around 44% said they would put the cash towards paying off unsecured debts, while 30% would start an emergency savings account and 30% would start long-term savings.
Just 5% would use the money to take out some form of financial protection for their family.
Breaking the bank
There are a number of misconceptions about life insurance which discourage some people from taking it out.
The first, and perhaps the most significant, is the idea that life insurance is expensive; according to Aviva’s research, almost a fifth of families blame the cost for their lack of cover. The thing is, they would struggle to be more wrong – life insurance can be extremely cheap, with some policies starting at just £5 a month. Who can’t afford £60 a year for the sake of protecting their loved ones’ future?
What’s more, costs are falling, as I explained in Life insurance cheapest for nine years. However, there’s a good chance that such price falls will not last, so if you want to protect your family, now is a financially sensible time to do so.
Another barrier to taking out life insurance is the idea that it ‘never pays out’ and so is not worth buying. Again, this is plain wrong – the most recent figures from the Association of British Insurers showed that policies were paid out in 90% of cases, while some insurers publish their own figures (particularly when they pay out as many as 99% of cases).
Finding the right cover
So we’ve established that life insurance is crucial cover for parents, is affordable, and does actually pay out. But with so many different forms of life insurance, it can be confusing working out exactly which type of cover – and how much – to go for.
We have a life insurance calculator here at lovemoney.com which you can use to work out how much cover is appropriate for you, while a read of How to pick the right life insurance policy should help you make the right decision when selecting cover.
And once you’ve worked out what cover you need, why not make use of lovemoney.com’s life insurance quote engine to compare the best policies in the market today?
Putting it in trust
One thing to consider when sorting out a life insurance policy is whether to have it written into trust. This essentially means that it is viewed as separate to your estate should you die. And there are a number of benefits.
For starters, it means that the money will be paid quickly, as it sidesteps any issues there may be with your estate and the Inland Revenue, which take an average of six months. What’s more, the money goes to exactly who you specify it should go to, rather than simply to your estate.
In addition, doing so can help you reduce any Inheritance Tax bill you may face. Find out more in How to cut your Inheritance Tax bill.
More: Compare life insurance quotes with lovemoney.com | Beat inflation with this savings account | The 10 weirdest homes!
Most Recent
Comments
-
If you have any children under the age of 18, you should make a Will and name a legal guardian(s) in the event of your, and the other parent’s death. By not specifying a guardian in a Will, you are leaving this immensely important decision up to strangers! Basically the court will choose who will care for your children. This is a useful article with 'Top 10 Considerations when Naming Guardians in Wills' - http://blog.glosslegal.co.uk/guardians-2/naming-a-guardian-in-your-will
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I am a single parent to 10 year old twins. i'm lucky in the respect that my dad's career was pensions/investments, he made me aware and helped me source a good package, i think you have to do what you can for your children while you're here, and if that is spending a small amount to cover yourself then so be it.... you're kids are already going to have a horrendous loss to deal with, without having to worry about who is going to afford to keep food on the table for them. There are plenty of good deals, i actually pay £20 a month and i am considered as a low income family, i struggle, financially but should anything happen to me i've made sure that their guardians (my sister and her husband) get a monthly income until they are 18 and my twins will each recieve a lump sum when they turn 18. I wouldn't have it any other way. My kids are my life, it's my obligation to make sure they are looked after both while i'm here and if i'm not.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Mambach's view is short sighted citing that "the house never loses". Your children *will* lose if you die with a mortgage left on the house as the house will very likely have to be sold and mortgage repaid. Your children will have to find somewhere else to live. So not only have they lost 1 or both parents, they now stand to lose their home which could mean changing school, losing friends etc - imagine the phsycological damage and potential mental illness that this could cause. If that isn't worth £5 a month I have to say I do wonder on parents priorities. Yes insurance is gambling, but £5 a month to be sure that you have done the responsible thing regarding your children is a very noble bet. You wouldn't say that about a horse racing bet, so putting all insurances in the same "gambling=bad" pot is overly simplistic. The fact is actually that you are gambling either way. You are either gambling with your children, or £60 per year. So the choice isn't about wether to gamble or not, it is which do you value more. I would always echo the recommendations by this article except the part about putting in trust. If you really don't think you can afford £5 a month, send me your monthly budget and I'll point out what you should be sacraficing/saving money on. I bet you would have a choice of things that either you could get cheaper or that you really don't need for the sake of your children and/or partner's health and wellbeing.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
17 May 2011