Top

Government plans to turn landlords into immigration officers are crazy

Landlords are furious at having to deal with yet more red tape now that they will be responsible for checking the immigration status of their tenants.

Under proposed new rules announced in last week’s Queen’s Speech, landlords will now be held responsible for checking the immigration status of their tenants.

The Immigration Bill will require private landlords to support a crackdown on illegal immigrants by taking responsibility for checking the status of all of their tenants.

They will need to obtain copies of passports and relevant work visas before they begin a tenancy, and they could potentially be fined thousands of pounds if they are found to be housing illegal immigrants. As yet, it still isn’t clear if landlords will be expected to check these documents for existing tenants.

The Government is clearly moving into UKIP territory with its Immigration Bill, trying to demonstrate its willingness to tackle the thorny issue. But rather than dealing with immigration at the borders, the new tactic seems to include dragging employers and now landlords into the mix with its new proposals.

Not popular

The plans relating to landlords have already been heavily criticised by many in the property and lettings sector for placing a huge burden on almost two million buy-to-let landlords and adding to the reams of red tape they already have to deal with.

Others – including Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - have noted that the scheme will be unworkable because there isn’t a national register of landlords to begin with. So how will the Government even know who they all are?

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors claimed that the Government is expecting the property industry "to deliver its immigration policy", at the same time as refusing to introduce better laws to protect both tenants and landlords.

It also points out that many landlords are amateurs, operating without training or guidance. What they definitely aren’t are immigration officers, so how they will be expected to suss a forged work permit or passport from a real one is a mystery.

Will they be offered training by the Government? If they seek proof of status from tenants and they are given a forgery, will they be punished for not spotting it? Or will it be sufficient to have simply asked to see something?

Of course, the devil as always will be in the detail, and we don’t yet have that level of information on the specifics of the bill.

But what could be the impact of the measures?

Results of the rules

The Government has also been warned that it must ensure the new rules do not inadvertently increase costs to renters, as increased red tape and regulatory burdens on landlords are so often passed on. Rents are already at very high levels and many tenants could not take an increase.

One obvious result, and something that has been already articulated by some landlords, is that they may play it safe by only letting properties to those who are UK-born citizens, which would potentially discriminate against some vulnerable sections of society.

The only possible benefit to landlords that I can see from the new rules is that the more onerous rules might help them spot unsuitable tenants in the first place, highlighting potential problems before they are taken on.

Of course, the majority of landlords already look into the backgrounds of their tenants, not least to ensure they have the means to pay, but also to check they have kept previous rented accommodation in a good state. But it does seem a bit much to expect them to check something that was previously missed at the border by trained immigration control officers.

It also seems unlikely (to me at least) that this measure will actually help to control immigration in any meaningful way. But of course it will add to the regulatory burden faced by landlords.

In addition it’s possible that the new rules will mean that the cost of landlord insurance will increase as a knock-on effect of the potential increased liability if landlords face a fine for housing illegal immigrants.

In an environment where landlords have more than enough Government policy to cope with, including Universal Credit, and selective licensing schemes, this is the last thing they need, especially when it is unclear if this will really have a tangible impact on immigration control anyway.

What do you think? Should landlords be responsible for checking tenants’ immigration status or should this be dealt with at the borders?

More on buy to let:

The 10 best towns for landlords

How renting can damage your health

Lodgers vs tenants: how your rights and responsibilities change

Letting agents to be regulated

Government landlord licensing scheme branded a failure

New websites allow landlords to review their tenants

Pick the right tenant

What to do if your tenant won't pay!

Most Recent


Comments



  • 26 May 2013

    In Soviet Russia, most of you people would have been the ones lining up to denounce your neighbours for some minor infraction and have them sent to the gulags. I should think you're proud. Personally I'm not about to be an informer, let alone an unpaid one.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 25 May 2013

    2 of my white english sons rent properties and have never been asked for passports /I.D . I wonder whether their names and colour yet again gave them unfounded unique and unfair advantage. Yes we have to check whether people can pay the rent but after credit checks then I think it should stop there. Anyone can pack their bags , flee the country but considering you usually have to pay a deposit , 2 months advance rent, signing up fees and at the age of 24 with a full time job my son had to ask his dad to support his application at a cost of £40 admin charge. It is not for landlords to do this work . Maybe if the conservatives get in again the landlords may be helpful in other surveys.. maybe gay /lesbian couples or those with disabilities. The list is endless as is the stupidity of this government.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 25 May 2013

    This is merely an extension of previous Government “initiatives”. Successive Governments have failed to do their job of controlling illegal immigration. Their first target to whom to shift their responsibilities was the trucking companies, some of which were single unit owner/drivers, fining them a lot of money if an illegal immigrant was found to have smuggled him/herself onto one of their lorries. Then they targeted employers to ensure that people they employ were here legally, not withstanding that they, the self same Government themselves, had issued NI numbers to the “illegals”. What chance did employers have? Now these wonderful Westminster Warriors have struck on their latest whizzo idea. Shift their responsibility onto landlords to do what they have signally failed to do over decades. Even if you ignore the increased cost, just how is a landlord supposed to verify that a prospective tenant is here legally? Passports and work permits – could you spot a forgery? Also, not all immigrants illegal or not come with come with “immigrant” stamped on their forehead and not all UK “citizens” are stereotypically UK looking. Of course credit checks are done as normal but financial probity or lack of it is no evidence of immigration status. Then there is the ID card suggestion. If only we could be sure that it would only ever be an ID card but you can be as certain as the sun rises in the east that the command and control possibilities offered by ID cards would be more and more abused. Even at the outset, New-Labour's proposal had unacceptable amounts of personal information linked to the the card and the reality was that they could not guarantee security. They said that it would be absolutely secure and then utterly exposed their mendacity by confirming that “celebrities” and MPs would not be on the register because the wrong people could get hold of the information. Both feet blasted off at a stroke. Nice to see though that Labour have the priority right with the shadow Home Sec concerned that the Government does not have a list of landlords to “target”. Still, it's an ill wind, it's probably just a scam to extort some cash out of landlords. Of course it would put rents up.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.