Estate agents threatened by property websites
New rules could break estate agents' grip on home sales, but would this be a good thing?
Along with bankers, bailiffs, bouncers and traffic wardens, estate agents regularly feature near the top of 'most-hated professions' surveys here in the UK.
Hence, news that the government is to relax the rules surrounding the sale of private homes will delight those Brits fed up with sharp-suited property salespeople!
Cutting more red tape
The government is absolutely desperate to dig Britain's property market out of the doldrums and turn it back into an engine of economic growth. Hence, last week, the coalition announced plans to ditch planning permission for extensions and conservatories.
This week, consumer affairs minister Jo Swinson at the Department for Business, Innovations and Skills announced plans to alter the Estate Agents Act and scrap the Property Misdescriptions Act, so as to make it easy for property websites to take on high-street estate agents. The aim is to make sales of private homes easier and cheaper, helping to restore a vibrant and active market for domestic property.
This 'bonfire of red tape' would reduce the regulations surrounding property sales. Right now, the law treats many websites that display property sales in much the same way as estate agents. This forces these online services to check that property descriptions are accurate, pushing up their costs and fees, while slowing down their service.
Hence, the government plans to give property websites more freedom to compete with estate agents by scrapping the legal requirement for them to them to perform detailed property checks.
Good for buyers, bad for agents?
While any new competition in tightly controlled markets is to be welcomed, estate agents warn that this proposed change could lead to fresh problems for buyers. They claim that websites that match up buyers and sellers are no match for local experience 'on the ground', backed up by consumer regulations, reliable property descriptions and government-approved complaints procedures.
However, I feel that estate agents are protesting too much. In effect, the proposed amendment would create a two-tier market for selling homes. On one hand would be the low-cost, no-advice route via websites, while on the other would be traditional estate agents with their local knowledge, negotiating skills and fees of between 1.5% and 2.5% of each sale's value.
Even so, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) claims that, "This [proposed change] could lead to delays, increased costs and even sales falling through, causing frustration and stress for all involved." Given the success of the Internet in enhancing, simplifying and speeding up other aspects of our personal and financial lives, this sounds like sour grapes to me.
Could Tesco return to house sales?
It will be interesting to see whether these changes might prompt supermarket to enter or return to this market.
At the peak of the property boom in 2007, Tesco launched Tesco Property Market, an 'online notice board' that charged property sellers £199 to advertise a home. Alas, the subsequent collapse in home sales, plus a successful legal challenge by estate agents, led to the site being shut down in its infancy.
Another site that struggles on against the estate agents' near-monopoly is Tepilo, a free service run by property guru and TV presenter Sarah Beeny, who welcomes the move to relax red tape for low-cost 'sale by owner' intermediaries.
In an interview with the Daily Mail, Beeny argued, "This is an important step and can only be a good thing for sellers. If people want to use an estate agent, that's fine and they still can, but you can't ignore that the Internet is here and people want to do things in a different way. Good agents should have nothing to fear and should be happy that they can prove the value they add."
Fat fees under threat
In summary, estate agents may be making a needless fuss, as they perform up to 97% of all home sales. What's more, increased choice and lower costs will surely help to stimulate the property market, thus benefiting all participants.
On the other hand, enhanced competition may encourage estate agents to introduce flat fees, rather than levying fees as a percentage of sale prices. Again, this could save sellers thousands, while putting more pressure on one of Britain's least-loved business sectors.
Finally, if you think estate agents are expensive in the UK, then look westwards towards the US. In America, fees are around the 5% to 6% mark, which explains why 'sale by owner' transactions account for up to three-tenths (30%) of all private home sales!
More:
Compare and find mortgages
The pros and cons of online estate agents
Comments
-
Or if you really wanted to save money, you could use http://www.turtlehomes.co.uk who will advertise your property on rightmove and zoopla from just £195+VAT!!
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Love the article, but I think there's another alternative that's not really covered. There's a big gulf between traditional high street agents and private sale type sites as mentioned in the article. A key downside with traditional agency is that it can be very expensive. On the other hand, the big drawback with private sale is that sellers can't get on to Rightmove and the other big portals, which is where most of the buyers are. There are now a growing number of online estate agents who will list properties on Rightmove, etc, but at far lower cost. Online agents usually work on a fixed fee basis (typically charging around £500) with no commission. The result is that the seller ends up paying far less than with traditionally, but still gets the same online coverage as well as support and advice from an estate agent. Online agents are regulated in exactly the same way as high street agents and bound by the same legislation. They must all be registered with the Office of Fair Trading and be a member of one of the two Ombudsmen schemes for the estate agency industry. The precise level of service varies between online agents, but it is easily possible to give a full service whereby everything is done for the seller except for the viewings, which they conduct themselves. In other words, photos, floorplans and descriptions are produced; valuations are done; a For Sale board is put up; buyers are vetted; feedback is sought after viewings; advice is given; negotiations are done; and sales are progressed to completion: all in the normal way. By way of full disclosure I run the online estate agency http://www.househop.co.uk so I have an interest in their success. But I truly believe that this is the way the market is going and we are getting more and more referrals from clients who have successfully sold through us, so we must be doing something right!
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
About time too, we own the worlds largest website for selling your house free online (http://www.propertysell.co.uk) and have even had restrictions from companies like RightMove etc with listing our properties, there is a thriving market if you can tap into it, of websites where you can sell your house yourself and about time the monopolised Estate Agents were put in there place, why pay £10,000 to sell your house when you can do it for free? It is up to individuals to make the correct choice in purchasing a property using the correct legal procedures and they do not need government legislation, we can make our own decisions, no doubt a few people will make the wrong choice and blame the government for their decisions.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
22 July 2014