Top

Bank of England asks regulators to act on mortgage lending


Updated on 16 July 2014 | 2 Comments

The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee has recommended lending limits and 'stress tests' to prevent potential future debt.

The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC) has recommended that the financial regulators take steps to cap mortgage lending.

In its June Financial Stability Report, the FPC advised the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to take two steps.

Two-pronged approach

The first is to ensure mortgage lenders who lend over £100 million a year limit high loan-to-income borrowing. Specifically, the FPC recommends that no more than 15% of lenders’ new mortgages should be lent to borrowers who have loan-to-income ratios (the ratio of mortgage to household income) of 4.5 or higher.

The second is that mortgage lenders should conduct a ‘stress test’ when they’re assessing mortgage applications. This should see if borrowers could still afford to make their repayments if the Bank of England Base Rate was to rise by three percentage points (so, for example, rising from 1% to 4%) during the first five years of the mortgage.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders says many lenders are already stress testing whether people could afford mortgage repayments if rates rose by between 2.5-3 percentage points. These stress tests were introduced as part of the Mortgage Market Review back in April and this recommendation just seems to be a duplication of what's already in place.

Looking for a mortgage? Check the latest rates

'Prudent' steps

In terms of the loan-to-income limit, the FPC cited a survey from earlier this year which said that 30% of UK households had mortgage debts that exceeded four or more times their income.

These households typically also have amounts of other unsecured debt such as credit cards and personal loans too.

The FPC sees the effects of a potential rise in interest rates for these households not as an “immediate threat to financial stability”. But it feels its recommendations are “prudent”.

However, it also appears to be an effort to potentially cool London house prices, which are racing ahead of the rest of the UK's. The Council of Mortgage Lenders says, in the first quarter of this year, around 9% of mortgages in the UK as a whole were for 4.5 times or more the borrower’s income. However, in London this figure was 19%.

What happens now

The FPC's loan-to-income limit will apply to completed mortgages. It is set to come into force on 1st October and will include mortgage applications began before that date but completed on or after it.

The PRA is now consulting on exactly how it will be implemented.

Help to Buy capped

Separately, the Treasury has announced that no new loans at or above 4.5 times borrowers’ income can be included in the Help to Buy mortgage guarantee scheme. It will consult lenders on how to implement this.

Looking for a mortgage? Check the latest rates

More on mortgages and property:

Seven reasons mortgage lenders turn you down

The mortgages that will see you through a rate rise

Lenders attempt to defuse interest-only mortgage 'timebomb'

Help to Buy figures suggest scheme most useful outside of London

Most Recent


Comments



  • 29 June 2014

    Completely agree with you, oldhenry. I have just seen a linear graph for London houses between 2010 and now, and the shape of it is almost a perfect exponential function. That can only mean there is going to be one almighty crash. It is only a matter of when. Often the trigger is a new piece of legislation - something along the lines that Carney is suggesting might be the last straw. I agree that this country is obsessed with the value of their houses, and it is totally unproductive. This country will never mend itself until it starts to produce goods that can be exported.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 26 June 2014

    4.5 times salary? So the country is really going for broke this time. The negative equity in the next house price slump will make new records but the fact is the government backed losses will fall on us taxpayers so better not crow. The only economic activity seems to be selling houses now in the UK and that is just like having an economy by cutting each others hair. It does not work but Cameron hopes it will see him through to the next election where grateful house owners will give him five more years. Sadly the alternatives seem even worse.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.