Top

Beware of the Jobcentre

Watch out for these bogus job scams!

There's no point being savvy about money if you have none coming in. Many people who find themselves unemployed turn to Jobcentre Plus, “The Nation’s Official Website”, in order to get back to work. Because of its association with the government - it is an executive agency of the Department of Work and Pensions - people feel they can trust the jobs advertised there.

However, it has been revealed that 'fake' or ‘bogus’ jobs are being displayed both on the Jobcentre Plus website and within its branches. Although Jobcentre Plus says that it works hard to check the validity of all the jobs it advertises, it admits that some may 'fall through the net'. 

The Problem

The economic climate has seen an increase in rates of unemployment, making it a perfect time for unscrupulous scammers to tap into the jobseeker ‘market’. It is expected that the number of jobseekers will increase further over the coming months, largely due to the current welfare reform shake up.

Incapacity Benefit is being scrapped and people claiming that benefit are being reassessed for Employment and Support Allowance. It is predicted that many claimants under the old system will be judged as being ‘fit for work’ under the new guidelines. This means they will not be given Employment and Support Allowance, but will have to claim Jobseekers Allowance instead, and actively look for work. Strict rules mean that your benefits can be cut or stopped altogether if you don’t apply for a set number of jobs, or if you repeatedly refuse jobs offered to you.

But what if the jobs you are applying for, through the trusted arena of Jobcentre Plus, turn out to be bogus? As more and more people, some in already vulnerable positions, turn to the Jobcentre to search and apply for jobs, does the Jobcentre have an increased duty to check the validity of its job advertisements? 

How to recognize a Jobcentre Scam

There are certain job adverts that should automatically raise your suspicions. If a job is offering unrealistic cash for little effort, if they are asking you to pay money for ‘training’, or if you are told to call a premium rate number to apply for the job, then it might be wise to steer clear! 

A good example of a dubious job advertisement, found on the Jobcentre Plus website, is the role of ‘eBay Auction Lister.’ Using your own eBay account you sell goods on behalf of a company. When the auction ends, the Buyer sends you the money, which you send on to the ‘company’ (minus a small commission for yourself) and the ‘company’ should then dispatch the goods to the customer. In reality, the company disappears after you’ve sent the money; the customer receives nothing and complains to eBay and Paypal, who issue a refund – from your account! They then pursue you for the debt. 

Another common scam involves an applicant giving all their details to a potential ‘employer’ and being told an application pack will be posted out to them. You then receive a package containing a mobile handset, followed by an apologetic call from the ‘employer’ explaining that the wrong package has been sent and you have someone else’s phone instead of the application pack. They send a courier to pick up the phone, then later you do receive a pack in the mail – but it is a Welcome Pack from a mobile phone company. A contract has been set up in your name, using all the details you gave out earlier. The handset is with the fake employer, but the bills come through to the applicant.

Are the Jobcentre doing enough?

Despite claims by the Department of Work and Pensions that the Jobcentre has a dedicated team of staff who check the validity of the jobs they post, they have admitted that it is impossible to check every single advert. With upward of 10,000 jobs a day being posted nationally it would take a huge investment to commit to thoroughly checking out each post, which would not be viable on a practical level.

There is an argument that applicants shouldn’t expect to be ‘spoon-fed’ by the government, and many will say that people need to have a measure of personal responsibility for their own safety. Just as we can’t realistically expect Yellow Pages to check every advert it puts in its directory, we can’t expect the Jobcentre to vet every job.

But I think the Jobcentre could do more than it currently is. ‘Obvious’ scam jobs seem to frequently slip through the net. ‘Roles’ like the eBay scam, or jobs demanding up-front payments from applicants, should ring immediate alarm bells with Jobcentre staff and warrant further investigation. The Jobcentre could also protect themselves, to a degree, by publishing warnings on its site that not all jobs have been vetted so jobseekers do not blindly trust what they are reading.

Staying Safe

Employment scams have been ripping people off for years – you just don’t expect to see them in the Jobcentre! If you are looking for work then follow these tips:

  •          Do not call expensive premium rate numbers (usually starting with 070 or 090) to find out about a job.
  •          Don’t give out personal or financial details such as bank account number, National Insurance number etc. These should only be given when you have a job offer or start a job.
  •          Don’t pay any upfront fees.
  •          Investigate the company yourself. Do an internet search and check Companies House to make sure they exist! 

Jobcentre Plus does have a section on its website dedicated to safe jobseeking, so take a look for more information.

Protect yourself!

If you are not sure about the validity of a job then take the initiative; investigate it yourself, asking the Citizens Advice Bureau for help if necessary, and report any suspect ads to your local Jobcentre Plus.

More: The top low-rate credit card 

Most Recent


Comments



  • 14 November 2011

    The Job Centre itself is a waste of time - they have a turnover of staff I believe of about 40% every year, realms and realms of paper to fill out for a tiny amount of money. I know someone who was 5 days from starting their PhD and was told to come for interview for a job or they would not pay JSA. - come on how ridiculous is that? They were only applying to JSA as they needed it so they would be exempt from rates as they had no income till they got their stipend - when you pay peanuts you get monkeys!!!

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 03 October 2011

    Stevie. I think you put your case eloquently and clearly. The only answers that I can see are that if staff are PAID to do a job, then they should do it - the morale of the workforce does not stop people doing their job. As they are paid for by the taxpayer, WE expect them to do their job diligently and professionally. Anything less, then why do WE employ them? If you didn't do your job to a satisfactory level in the private sector - goodbye job. The only problem I had with them was their attitude, why should I be expected to tolerate being spoken at like I was dirt? I don't deserve it. I really don't care what the previous victim was like, that's not my concern. They should behave professionally. You mention staffing levels. When I was there, there didn't appear to be ANY rush at all, and there were several people standing around not really doing very much. Staff shortages didn't exactly spring to my mind..... Also, the cuts are hard, BUT the Tories are only clearing up the mess left behind by the previous 13 years of Labours borrow, borrow, borrow. Please tell that to you neighbour, so she can reconsider her affiliation with Labour.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 22 September 2011

    Working in a customer-facing role, typically as first point of contact, customers can be really annoying and it gets worse when they are angry due to something someone else has done. If job centre staff cannot cope with customer interaction, or, use text book techniques to calm the situation down and give great customer service then they shouldn't be in such a job, likewise, the same for advisers. For “customers” who are unemployed (all of them) especially those who are actively looking for work, it becomes very frustrating in seeing that those who cannot do the job properly have a job and those who need a job, and who think they can do it better, i.e. themselves, don't have the opportunity. This is how people get so upset with the poor service delivered and where it becomes very politically orientated. Currently, job centre staff are on about 15k annually, or, about minimum wage for the hours they work, these are the ones you mainly deal with in the job centres, many of them are on 12 month contracts which are sometimes non-negotiable, depending on their years of service, etc, they either carry on after a year, or, there contract is terminated, which does happen, believe it, or, not. I know for a fact that many of them are just as worried about their futures, as they have mortgages, bills to pay, just like we do. The Gov't treats them badly, chasing targets is the norm these days, as with many other Gov't orientated organisations, rather than actually trying to get folks back into work, they are the thin end of the wedge, abusive yobs and drunks going into offices at all times (hence, they have security staff on-site every day), students who won't even fill in the appropriate booklets to prove they are seeking jobs, and they all say that the documents are difficult to understand (yet, they managed to have the brains to get into University!!). My near neighbour was made unemployed after 29 years service to this industry and had to sign on, ironically, she was interviewed by one of the people she once trained. So, [mepink53], apart from your cynical statement """do em good to see what it's like''', they do know what it's like and are just as miffed as the rest of the jobless in our society, and as for those of us of a mature age, we have less likely opportunities to get back into work, as against the many able-bodied, but, couldn't give a sh1t, lazy, unemployed layabouts, who apply for every benefit going, but, don't deserve a penny, which is one reason I wouldn't work in one of these places, as I'd tell all these scrounging ******* what I think of them and the system they abuse so openly and freely. Having read all of the comments on this page, I doubt if ANY of you would be prepared to go and work in one of these offices for 12 months in a major town and city, you all seem to think it's such an easy task. Morale in these offices is virtually rock-bottom nowadays, and as staff may be made redundant themselves at any time, is it any wonder that the 'couldn't give a toss' attitude has crept in here as well which reflects on the way some unemployed are treated each time they attend to sign on. And as regards the topic of this article, it's alright saying that JCP should check adverts, but, where offices have been chopped down to a bare minimum amount of staff, they don't all have anyone available to check things, or, does the journalist think that they have staff falling over themselves these days, Government Cuts affects everywhere you know. Having been unemployed personally, I tend to look at things from both sides of an argument, and with my personal experience and having spoken to employees, I gain their side of the story as well, perhaps you lot should do too before criticising. My neighbour is a staunch Labourite, so she hates this coalition Gov't and everything it's doing to this nation's workers and the unemployed, she never voted them into power, but, has now experienced the backlash of them being in that position, job centre staff don't make the rules, they just abide by them, maybe some of you folks don't understand that concept.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.