Top

Which?: The four ways supermarkets con shoppers


Updated on 29 May 2012 | 31 Comments

New research from Which? pinpoints how we are being tricked into thinking we are getting a good deal by the big supermarkets.

Supermarkets are using sneaky tactics to trick us into thinking we are getting a bargain, according to research by consumer champions Which?

Which? gathered data over one year on nearly 700,000 supermarket prices from independent grocery shopping website MySupermarket.co.uk and surveyed 1,802 UK residents online in February 2012.

Four main manipulative tactics were identified, employed by the supermarkets to confuse shoppers into thinking they are getting a better deal than they really are.

1. Multibuy scams

Most of us naturally assume buying in bulk will save us money. In theory it should work out cheaper, but Which? has found otherwise.

In one scenario with Asda, the price of a single Müller yogurt was doubled from 30p to 61p just before the product went onto a multibuy offer of ten for £4.

What makes this rip off alarming is that the price returned to 30p after the offer ended, meaning customers were actually better off once the promotion had finished.

2. The ‘offer’ charade

The research found a great number of products were sold as on ‘offer’ at the reduced price for longer than they had been sold at the 'real' price.

One case Which? cited was Tesco selling Beck’s beer for a total of 190 days at a discounted price and only 70 days at the higher ‘real’ price.

Why is that bad? Well, we are being tricked into thinking we have got a good deal. Psychologically we may buy more of an item because it is on offer, fearing that the the offer may not be there next week.

Plus if something is on ‘offer’ for 190 days, it does make you wonder about what the real price should actually be.

3. Epic price crashes

Which? found that supermarkets were hiking prices before putting items on ‘offer’, making the discount and potential money saving total much more significant.

In one case, Ocado strawberries increased in price from £3.89 to £4.38 for 13 days, then were put on offer stating ‘was £4.38 now £2.19/£2.29/£2.25’ for 112 days.

Genius! A saving of £1.70 sounds alright, but clearly not as exciting as getting them at half price.

4. Old prices

The sneakiest of them all was perhaps the use of old prices.

If you saw Aquafresh Milk Teeth Toothpaste in Asda, labelled with a bright red discount tag saying ‘was £1.74, now £1.15’ , all that most shoppers would do is work out the saving was 59p.

You perhaps wouldn’t think about when this product actually retailed for £1.74.

Which? in this particular example did, and found the highest price the toothpaste was sold at in their yearlong tracking experiment was £1.17. So a saving of just 2p.

Just mistakes

In response to the evidence all the retailers apologised and admitted they had made mistakes in some of their promotions. They blamed the fact that they change the price of millions of products each week, making it hard to get it right every time.

Although this could well be the case, the frequency of occurrences where promotions are confusing or unclear is enough to make anyone think that there is a strategy behind it, intended to trick shoppers and increase profits.

What’s the harm?

Iif supermarkets use dodgy tactics like the ones uncovered in this research, despite our best efforts we are being conned and could end up buying more than we need.

Based on these findings the average shopper needs to have a very good memory as well as be able to use a lot of maths to work out if they are making a real saving or should avoid the promotion altogether.

The fact we are unable to know when something ‘was’ a price and are unable to track the length of offers without our own lengthy research means we are at the mercy of supermarkets and their pricing strategies, never knowing when a special offer is really special.

Action

Which? think this is unfair and have called for the Government to crackdown on this dodgy practice with more enforcement of the rules which state:

- The ‘was’ price should be the most recent price a product was sold at for 28 consecutive days.

- A discounted product must have been at the higher price for at least as long as it has been discounted.

What do you think? Are these tactics really that bad? What are your experiences of dodgy deals? Let us know in the comment boxes below.

More on supermarkets:

Slash your supermarket delivery costs!

The best supermarket financial products

Return of the Tesco Clubcard Voucher Exchange

Tesco rebrands Value range

Morrisons, Tesco, Asda or Sainsbury's: which store has the cheapest ...

Most Recent


Comments



  • 30 November 2012

    I just hate it when I get to the til and I'm charged more for an item. When you explain that it is on offer, the assistant then has to get supervisor who after a lengthy discussion then says, but that offer has ended. Then WHY don't they alter their cost. This has happened to me on many occasions and I think it is sharp practice - I am lucky I dont have to buy trolly loads of goods a week and so notice each item ringing through the til. Other people with large families, often don't have time to check each item.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 20 November 2012

    We shopped at ASDA to-day.A box of 120g maltesers=£1.00,a box of 360g maltesers=£4.88.The large box is £1.88 more expensive. Coke,pack of eight £2.50,so sixteen cost £5.00,a case of fifteen cost £5.00,a case of thirty cost £11.88.which costs £2.51 more than buying the eight packs. This is a blinding rip off,which is easily fixed,carry a calculator and compain.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 15 November 2012

    Aldi don't have sufficient fresh meat and fish to make them a one-stop main shop, but I do use them for basic frozen foods like chips, sweetcorn, peas etc and will pick up other basics if I need them. I visit about once a month to six weeks. I also use a great farm shop in Southbourne, Hants which has a good range of loose frozen foods at surprisingly reasonable prices. Re: price variations. On a visit to Sainsburys I found 5 or 6 different packs and boxes of my favourite sweets, Maltesers with varying prices per 100g ranging from £1.21 up to over £2.00. The most expensive was a special 'Christmas' pack designed to go on a tree which had hardly any sweets for the top price per 100g. Advice - buy standard packs and make your own Christmas tree decoration packs to go round them. You will spend less overall and your kids will have fun making the decs, This variation between apparently similar packs was not peculiar to Sainsburys.My local Co-op AND Wilkinsons had similar variations on prices for Maltesers in different pack sizes, so what looked a great deal at a special price of £1 per pack in the Co-op was actually more expensive per 100g than some of the others. The multi-packs of 'treat size' which ought to be good value are really not at all!

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.