Parking fine bonanza: councils raking in the most from parking notices

The number of parking charges issued by local authorities has increased over the last year, but which councils are keenest on issuing penalty charge notices?

New analysis from Churchill Motor Insurance has found that there has been a substantial increase in the number of parking fines issued by local councils over the last year.

The insurer issued a Freedom of Information request to councils across the country and found that councils typically issued 19,631 per day across 2022.

That’s an increase of around 12% on the previous year, and up by a third of 2020.

These penalty charge notices have brought in an average of a whopping £777,287 per day across the nation, with the typical local authority issuing 85 fines on a daily basis.

However, as the tables below highlight, some councils are far more prolific in issuing those fines than others.

Here are the 10 local authorities that issued the most penalty charge notices in 2022.

Local authority

Daily average PCNs issued

Daily average revenue raised

London Borough of Islington

1012

£44,799

London Borough of Lambeth

999

£48,424

London Borough of Waltham Forest

874

£41,215

City of Westminster

843

£42,099

London Borough of Newham

720

£34,206

Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames

606

£32,818

Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea

545

£27,776

London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham

540

£27,837

London Borough of Barnet

507

£24,548

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

504

£24,395


The first thing to note here is that each and every single one of these local authorities are located within the capital.

And yet even within these top 10, there's a huge difference in the number of charge notices being issued, and the subsequent revenue raised from them.

Islington and Lambeth for example are issuing around double the number of charge notices as Tower Hamlets, and as a result, raising an extra £20,000 plus a day.

Helpfully, Churchill has also broken down the most charge-happy councils from outside London.

Local authority

Daily average PCNs issued

Daily average revenue raised

Birmingham City Council

373

N/A

Southampton City Council

313

£4,930

Cardiff Council

279

£7,543

Oxfordshire County Council

264

£6,862

Christchurch Borough Council

234

£6,230

Leicester City Council

209

£6,102

Bradford Metropolitan Council

204

N/A

Portsmouth City Council

186

£5,417

Luton Borough Council

169

£1,646

Newcastle upon Tyne City Council

169

£4,991


Once again there is a huge disparity on show here, with Birmingham at the top sending out more than double the number seen from Luton and Newcastle.

But the revenues raised are also incredibly changeable ‒ the bottom two councils in the list submit the same number of charges each day on average, and yet Newcatle’s bring in more than three times more cash from motorists.

Cashing in

Parking charges are clearly a huge earner for the nation’s councils.

A study back in 2021 from the AA found that, for some councils, the money they bring in from parking charges ‒ which include the likes of regular parking fees, permits and penalty notices ‒ comes to around three-quarters of what they make from Council Tax.

This demonstrates just what a big revenue stream they are.

For 2019/20, councils raked in a total of £1.8 billion from parking activity, which comes to a profit of around £900 million once they've paid all the middlemen who earn a living off fines.

These profits are even more significant in cities, the report found.

Here are how some of the individual council’s income from parking compares to the money brought in from Council Tax.

Council

Parking income as a percentage of Council Tax income

Westminster

75.1%

Kensington & Chelsea

45.1%

Hammersmith & Fulham

45.8%

Islington

32.4%

Camden

32.1%

Brighton & Hove

22.2%

Nottingham

18.4%

Newcastle

14.1%

Manchester

9.3%


These are clearly huge sums, which Edmund King, AA president, described as “breathtaking”.

He argued that councils have become almost dependent on the money they bring in from drivers, adding: “council cash-guzzling from parking charges, permits and fines can be staggering”.

Bus lane fines another nice little earner

Of course, when it comes to palatable costs, there’s a big difference between a regular parking meter and a penalty charge notice (PCN).

These latter charges are essentially fines when you’re believed to have done something wrong, like moving into a bus lane. 

Figures released by price comparison site Confused.com looke at the number of fines levied in 2019 for drivers moving into bus lanes, and breaks down which areas have seen the most drivers walloped with charges.

Across the nation as a whole, more than two million penalty charge notices (PCNs) were issued to drivers.

Taken together, those notices were worth an almighty £59.6 million, demonstrating clearly just how punishing these charges can be on our wallets.

So which areas are dishing out the most notices for bus lane incidents? Here are how the different regions compare:

Region

Value of fines

Number of fines issued

London

£14,688,255.96

301,651

North West

£9,123,915.81

390,831

Yorkshire & the Humber

£6,225,240.74

191,999

West Midlands

£5,573,767.20

246,404

East

£5,565,717.26

165,893

Scotland

£5,474,029.56

189,025

South East

£3,617,787.51

163,990

South West

£3,486,179.22

122,937

East Midlands

£2,539,714.53

94,036

Wales

£2,387,340.00

75,927

Northern Ireland

£537,008.13

11,371

North East

£404,684.60

25,716

What’s really interesting about this breakdown is that there isn’t always a correlation between the number of charges being issued and the amount drivers have had to pay. 

For example, drivers in the capital have had to cough up more than £14.5 million in total on bus lane fines, more than £5 million more than second-placed North West. 

And drivers in the North East had to pay out over £100,000 less than Northern Ireland, even though the region saw more than double the number of PCNs issued.

The costliest local authorities for bus lane fines

Of course, the table above details massive regions, but these PCNs are dished out by individual local authorities.

Confused have also drilled down into the data to identify those local authorities that have been keenest at handing out PCN.

Manchester took top spot, having hit drivers with a whopping 241,924 PCNs. Between them, they raised more than £4.8 million.

Glasgow took second spot, with 115,534 PCNs, collecting £3.4 million, while Birmingham issued the third most PCNs at 108,841. Despite this, Lambeth brought in the third-highest amount at almost £3 million. 

Save up to £250 on your car insurance in minutes with MoneySupermarket

What are the rules?

The Highway Code makes clear that bus lanes should be clearly marked by road markings and signs, which should make clear whether other vehicles are allowed to use that lane ‒ and when. 

There will be occasions when you can use it, even if you aren’t usually permitted to do so. This might be to pick up or drop someone off, to avoid an accident, or because there’s an obstruction in the road.

If you are caught using a bus lane, then you may be issued with a PCN by your local authority.

The penalty is halved if you pay within a fortnight of being issued with the PCN. You have 28 days in order to pay it or challenge it, and if you refuse to pay then you can be pursued through the courts.

Save up to £250 on your car insurance in minutes with MoneySupermarket

Making things less confusing

One of the big problems with bus lane PCNs is that there’s an awful lot of confusion about the rules, and when drivers are able to use them.

It’s an issue that has been subject to a suggested change from Boris Johnson too. Last year the Prime Minister argued that first-time offenders should get the benefit of the doubt and avoid being fined.

It’s an idea that has some support, with 57% of drivers polled by Confused backing it.

There was also support for other potential solutions, such as clearer road signage (59%), while almost half (47%) want bus lane restrictions to apply 24 hours a day so that things are less confusing. 

It’s worth remembering that if you think you’ve been issued with a PCN unfairly, then it’s well worth appealing.

We’ve detailed the process for appealing PCNs for parking fines, and it’s much the same for bus lane offences.

There are only certain grounds under which you can appeal. 

According to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, these include:

  • The authority levying a charge for more than they are entitled to;
  • The offence didn’t occur (for example the signs were wrong, the vehicle was allowed in the bus lane or the vehicle didn’t enter the bus lane);
  • A fixed penalty notice has already been issued for the same offence.

*This article contains affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission on any sales of products or services we write about. This article was written completely independently

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.