Car MOT: best & worst car models for passing the MOT first time

Which model failed more than half of its tests first time around?

An MOT can be a seriously stressful experience for any motorist. It’s the fear of the unexpected, the potential for your car to pick up a 'fail' and need some expensive work done before you can get back out on the road.

While there are plenty of things as drivers that we can do to improve our chances of passing, the truth is that different makes and models can have sharply different records when it comes to passing the MOT.

WhatCar have dug into the most recent data from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) to pick out which cars perform best in the tests the first time around, and which have room for improvement.

Don't get stranded by the roadside: AA breakdown cover from £4.50 a month

Small and family SUVs

WhatCar breaks the results down by a host of car categories, meaning that you get a better idea of how specific types of car perform in the MOT.

For example, it pointed out that small and family SUVs have the lowest overall MOT fail rate.

In this category, the Subaru Forester (made between 2008 and 2012) and the Mercedes GLA (still being made today) are particularly eye-catching, with fail rates of just 4.6% and 4.8% respectively. 

At the other end of the scale, while the Jeep Patriot has the worst overall performance, with a fail rate of 39.1% ‒ 12 percentage points higher than any rival ‒ it’s worth noting that Suzuki boasts three models in the bottom 10: the Jimny (21.1%), SX4 (22.1%) and the Grand Vitara (28.7%).

Could you save hundreds on your car insurance? Search for a cheaper policy with Confused.com

Subaru Forester has a good track record on MOT's (Image: Shutterstock)

City cars

The Skoda Citigo and the Peugeot 108 are the top performers in the city car category, with a fail rate of a paltry 6%.

While older models score noticeably poorly ‒ the Daewoo Matiz, which ceased production in 2005, is bottom with a 38.8% fail rate ‒ there are some newer models which also aren’t doing well with the MOT.

The Suzuki Alto for example only finished being produced back in 2009, but has a fail rate of a whopping 32.7%.

Small cars

WhatCar highlights the well-earned reputation among Japanese cars for reliability, with the Mitsubishi Mirage taking top spot with a fail rate of only 4.8%. The Toyota Yaris (6.3%) and Honda Jazz (7%) also feature in the top 10.

The Renault Clio (1998-2005) is the small car most likely to struggle, with a fail rate of 35.8%, while newer vehicles like the Peugeot 206 (1998-2009), the Fiat Punto (1999-2010) and Seat Ibiza (2002-2008) all feature in the bottom 10 as well, with fail rates of around 30%.

Could you save hundreds on your car insurance? Search for a cheaper policy with Confused.com

Family cars

With a fail rate of a tiny 3.7%, the electric Nissan Leaf has the best performance of any vehicle in the data. It’s followed by the Mazda 3 (4.8%), while it’s worth noting that Skoda (Rapid and Octavia) and Toyota (Auris and Prius) each have two models in the top 10.

WhatCar highlights that the worst performers list is dominated by older French and Italian cars, from the Fiat Stilo (37.5%) and the Peugeot 306 (32.6%) to the Renault Megane (31.9%).

Large and luxury SUVs

Nissan is a bit of a horror show in the large and luxury SUV division, taking the bottom two spots.

The Terrano Two was the worst overall with a fail rate of 36%, ahead of stablemate Pathfinder on 28.9%. Jeep also has two models in the bottom 10: the Cherokee and Grand Cherokee.

The Honda CR-V is the best performer in this category with a fail rate of just 6.7%, marginally ahead of the Lexus R6 at 6.8%.

MPVs

The Kia Carens did not fare well in the WhatCar? analysis (Image: Shutterstock)

When it comes to multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs), the most reliable appears to be the Skoda Roomster.

While WhatCar notes its “odd looks”, it has a fail rate of 7.1%, making it easily the top performer in this category ahead of the Ford B-Max (8.5%) and C-Max (9.8%).

Kia has two in the bottom four models for MPVs, with the Carens registering a fail rate of a whopping 39.5%, ahead of its Sedona model on 32.9%.

WhatCar pointed out that models that arrived at the peak of popularity for MPVs in the 1990s are starting to struggle with MOTs, with the Citroen C8 (35.2%), Ford Galaxy (32.4%) and Volkswagen Sharan (32.3%) all featuring in the bottom 10.

Don't get stranded by the roadside: AA breakdown cover from £4.50 a month

Executive cars

The Alfa Romeo 156 is the worst model here, with a fail rate of 35%, ahead of the Volvo V40 (34%), MG ZT (33.8%) and Renault Laguna (33.6%).

When it comes to reliably passing the test though, you could do worse than a BMW. The 4 Series has a fail rate of just 8.2%, with the 3 Series taking second spot with a fail rate of 11%.

Mercedes also has two models in the top 10: the CLA and C‒Class both have fail rates of 11.4%.

Luxury cars

Top spot in the luxury car division is taken by the Aston Martin DB9. It failed just 4.9% of tests, ahead of the Audi A8 (7.6%) and the A6 (8.4%).

Audi’s A7 also features in the top 10 with a fail rate of 10.8%, while Jaguar has three models of its own in the best performers ‒ the XJ, XK and XF.

Mercedes boasts four different models in the bottom 10, with the CL (23.9%) and E-Class (24.2%) taking second and third spot respectively. Worst of all though is the BMW 5-Series, with a fail rate of 28.7%.

Sports and performance cars

The Porsche 911 takes both top and second spot in this category. Its 997 version boasts a fail rate of just 6.4%, marginally better than the 6.7% fail rate of the 996 version.

A further two Porsche models ‒ the Boxster (9%) and the Cayman (10.3%) make the top 10.

At the other end of the scale, the Vauxhall Tigra failed a flabbergasting 58.1% of its MOTs in the data period, the worst of any model.

That’s far worse than the Alfa Romeo GT with a fail rate of 38%, while the manufacturer’s Brera model (25%) also makes the list.

*This article contains affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission on any sales of products or services we write about. This article was written completely independently.

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.