Why it's getting grimmer up north

The old `north-south divide' argument has reared its head again recently after the government announced its latest round of cuts. Robert Powell takes a look at the figures...

The government has outlined the cuts that councils across the country will face in the coming years, with Labour-run northern councils among the biggest losers.

Unsurprisingly this has re-ignited the north-south divide debate, with many accusing the government of subjecting the poorest communities to the harshest cuts.

But is it really about to get grimmer up north? Let’s take a look at the figures.

Council cuts

The average cut to councils across the country is 4.4% of ‘revenue spending power’ in 2011-12 and the maximum possible cut is 8.9%. But this figure includes council tax spending (which is raised by the council independently) as well as government funding in the form of grants (worked out by formula as well as on a case-by-case basis) in addition to extra NHS funding set to come in next year.

Here’s a table showing some of the councils getting the largest and smallest cuts. I’ve also included the figures showing the cuts in central government funding and how much each council takes in tax.

Council

Change in revenue spending power from 2010/2011 to 2011/2012

Government funding 2010 – 2011 (£m)

Government funding 2011 – 2012 (£m)

Council tax revenue (2010 – 2012) (£m)

Knowsley

-8.9%

165.2

141.8

53.3

Liverpool

-8.9%

472

399.9

164

South Tyneside

-8.9%

131.3

111.5

57.5

Hackney

-8.9%

296.7

258

73.4

Tower Hamlets

-8.9%

301.3

264.1

74.7

St Helens

-8.9%

128.1

110

64.3

Dorset

+0.25%

88

88.7

201.4

Richmond-upon-Thames

-0.61%

53.3

52.2

114.4

West Sussex

-0.65%

185.2

181.5

378.7

Wokingham

-0.63%

36.6

35.8

81.3

Buckinghamshire

-0.60%

110.5

108.4

228.7

Windsor & Maidenhead

-1.06%

33.5

32.5

65.8

Source: Department for Communities and Local Government

As you can see, not all the councils taking the maximum cut are in the north as several areas in London and across the south are also facing 8.9% cuts.

It’s important to remember that the sizes of the councils also vary and so the grants and council tax takings will depend on the number of people in the designated area. But there’s still a definite trend visible in the figures – the councils taking the greatest cuts are those that receive the highest grants and raise the least in tax.

The government obviously views these areas as the best places to make big savings – whether that’s a fair solution for plugging the country’s financial black hole is a different argument.

But still, looking through the figures it’s hard to find a northern council getting anything less than a 3% cut in spending power. This suggests that these councils need government grants more due to a high public service bill and a lack of council tax income.

For more on how the area in which you live may impact on you read How your postcode costs you money.

Public services

So what does a high public service bill and low council tax income suggest about an area?

Take a look at this table showing the life expectancies and unemployment rates (jobseekers allowance claims) in the councils I looked at earlier.

Council

Male life expectancy at age 65 (2007-9)

Female life expectancy at age 65 (2007-9)

Unemployment -November 2010 (population claiming JSA)

Knowsley

16.3

18.8

5.1%

Liverpool

15.7

18.4

7%

South Tyneside

16.8

19.4

5.4%

Hackney

18.8

22

6.9%

Tower Hamlets

17.1

19.2

6.4%

St Helens

16.4

19

4.8%

Dorset

19.6

22.3

1.7%

Richmond-upon-Thames

19.4

22.9

1.5%

West Sussex

18.6

21.1

2.3%

Wokingham

20.0

21.8

1.4%

Buckinghamshire

19.4

21.7

1.8%

Windsor & Maidenhead

18.2

20.9

1.7%

Source: Office for National Statistics (NB when unemployment data was unavailable for whole councils I averaged out a figure from the smaller local areas.)

You can see clearly that on paper life expectancies are lower and unemployment rates higher in the mainly northern councils that are facing the largest funding cuts.

This high amount of ill-health and unemployment obviously contributes to the large public service bill and lack of independent funding that many northern councils have. It’s a vicious circle that it’s this large funding requirement that is causing the neediest of councils to suffer the harshest cuts.

It may be controversial to say so, but at least on paper – a very clear north-south divide is visible within England.

But why?

The human divide

Reasons given for the north-south divide range from the plausible to the absurd – but I have never found one that I believe fully explains this apparent regional gap. And what’s more, I don’t think many other people have either.

This is why so many people will resort to crude stereotyping to explain facts that they can’t get their heads around.

Northerners become fat useless layabouts to those in the south, whilst in the north, southerners are the fat-cat suits out to rob us of everything we’ve got.

This is the real and far more sinister divide; not between public services or job markets, but between people.

This divide was wrenched open even further recently by Buckinghamshire Council leader David Shakespeare when he suggested that unemployed northerners should replace immigrants and pick fruit in the south.

It’s this type of brazen snobbery that will force the north-south divide in this country wider than the cuts ever could.

Needless to say, if the government can’t keep a lid on simple stereotypists like David Shakespeare when the real pain of the cuts starts to hit, the grim north will deliver the coalition a grim vote.

For more on the government’s spending reforms read Cut their benefits and force them to work.

What do you think?

Is there a north-south divide? Are the government cuts about to make it a lot grimmer up north?

Let us know your views in the comment box below.

More: Spending cuts: The biggest losers Why Britain is in deep doo-doo

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.