Top

Get £100,000 if you can't work


Updated on 22 August 2011 | 10 Comments

One insurer has paid an average £14,500 per year for seven years to its customers who are no longer able to work.

One insurer says that it is paying its customers for more than seven years after they lose income due to accident or ill health.

Over the past 12 months, insurer LV= paid out more than £12,000,000 to its customers with income-protection insurance who have contracted long-term illnesses. (Note: don't confuse that with payment protection insurance, which is sold with credit cards and with other forms of borrowing.)

The average benefit has been just under £14,500pa, and the insurer is paying out for an average 7.2 years. That's £104,000 per claimant over the course of the illness.

Four-tenths of claims came from musculo-skeletal disorders, cancer and “circulatory systems” and a third from mental disorders. Just 5% were from road or other accidents. A quarter of claims were for disorders of the nervous system and a variety of other problems.

Most people claim successfully

LV= reveals that it rejects 7% of claims, which doesn't seem disturbingly high to me. Just 1% of claims were turned down due to the policyholder failing to disclose something they should have done.

6% of claims are being rejected because the policyholders weren't covered under their circumstances. This shows you should really try to understand the circumstances under which the insurance will pay out before you buy.

Is the price worth it?

Although the insurer wants credit for being honest with its claims figures, it still has not revealed the single piece of information that instantly tells customers if the price is worth the cover: the “claims ratio”.

I have not known an insurer to reveal this figure without heavy arm twisting, e.g. from the regulator. Insurers' usual excuse is that the information might help their competition. Having worked in the industry in a variety of roles, I don't believe that for a second.

However, the latest figures I've managed to piece together indicates insurers as a whole pay out probably back to customers at least 57% of the income-protection insurance premiums they receive.

That already makes the insurance better value for money than buildings and contents insurance, but the real ratio is probably even better than that. If it gets out of the 50% to 59% range and goes into the 60%-69% range, it moves from borderline too expensive up to reasonable value.

Compare that with atrociously over-priced payment protection insurance, which has been typically paying in claims just 10% to 20% of the premiums we pay. On the other hand, car insurance pays out 70% to 79% of our premiums, making it a good value insurance – would you believe!

Life insurance is the real winner, with the industry paying out more in claims than it receives in premiums, making it the best priced insurance I know. The insurers make money by investing the premiums between receiving them and using them to pay claims.

More about income-protection insurance

When you're off work due to accident or illness for a period of time, usually four to 13 weeks, this insurance will start paying a tax-free monthly income, and it will continue paying you until you get back to work.

Mark Jones at LV= said: “While not directly comparable with income protection...data shows that under the Government's new employment and support allowance (replacing incapacity benefit), 93% of applications have not been successful.”

He continues: “Regardless of whether a number of these claims will eventually be overturned under appeal, this sends a clear message that the Government doesn't want and can't afford for people to rely on the state. People must make their own provisions for their financial future.”

Although our incomes are the most valuable things we have, most of us would rather protect our mobile phones and pets first. Yet without income we couldn't afford pets or mobile phones, or anything else.

Some policies pay out only when you can't do any work at all – a condition that many can find hard to meet. Other policies are more reasonable, paying out if you can't do your own job, or if you can't do a job similar to your own. Read the small print carefully.

More: Compare life insurance through lovemoney.com | The dangers of surveys | Insurance policies that pay out – and ones that don't

Most Recent


Comments



  • 25 October 2011

    Hi MouthyRob. All that stuff is important for insurers -- for their business models -- but not for customers. All we customers want/need to know is, are the insurers paying us back enough of our premiums to make the cost worthwhile? That's why your comment about PPI is also wrong - to say that it is a "rubbish" insurance. Although the insurance gets a lot of justified stick from being over-sold and mostly hideously overpriced -- including from me in the above article -- there are a handful of stand-alone providers (i.e. not lenders or banks) that charge very little for the insurance -- they have a high claims ratio. The cover still has lots of exclusions with the stand-alone providers, but they make sure the price of their product reflects that low cover. Hence, the insurance is perfectly acceptable, so long as the buyer feels the cover is useful to him/her and he/she understands how limited it is. That shouldn't leave many customers buying it at all, but there'll be a couple for whom it is worth it, and therefore not rubbish. All thanks to the claims ratio. It's a bit like travel insurance: the reason travel insurance is so cheap is that there are so many exclusions. it is not a very comprehensive insurance at all. However, it is still a useful insurance, so it is worth it to many people at the cheap price that it is sold for. Thanks again to the claims ratio. Neil

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 16 September 2011

    Hi I'm looking to get income-protection insurance but don't know where to start, also can I get an insurance on my ex husband who is now back living with me but still pays me £750 a month maintenance that's to maintain our children and him as I pay all house hold bills including the mortgage its all in my name, he lives with me in my house which was my half of our divorce settlement. Its a bit complicated I know!

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 25 August 2011

    The "Claims ratios" figures are ridiculous and uninformative. Obviously Life insurance has the highest claims ratio as insurers have the longest to invest the money before paying the claims (on average). With Income Protection, that period is less, and with the dreaded PPI, it's very little. I'm not defending PPI (it's clearly rubbish), nor am I attacking Income Protection (it's a very good idea as long as you're an employee and you review it every few years for level of financial cover) - but please don't try to compare apples with pears using some arbitrary measure. P.S. All you political commentators are on the wrong website.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.