The last housing crash, Part 2

Here's part two of our region-by-region review of the Nineties property slump. Brace yourselves!
In the first part of this article, I looked at how the last property crash panned out across the UK and in six of its twelve regions. For the record, here's how the average price fell over the entire nation:
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q2 1989 |
69,850 |
Q3 1995 |
61,115 |
Difference (£) |
-8,735 |
Change (%) |
-12.5 |
Now let's look at the highs and lows of the remaining six regions:
South East
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q1 1989 |
106,179 |
Q4 1992 |
73,556 |
Difference (£) |
-32,623 |
Change (%) |
-30.7 |
It may come as a surprise to many people in the affluent South East just how steeply prices fell in the last bust. In under four years, prices dropped by more than three-tenths (31%), plunging many homeowners into negative equity (when a property is worth less than the mortgage secured on it). So much for the South East being a safe haven when times are tough!
South West
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q1 1989 |
85,634 |
Q4 1992 |
60,522 |
Difference (£) |
-25,112 |
Change (%) |
-29.3 |
The South West followed an identical path to its neighbour the South East, peaking in early 1989 and bottoming out at the end of 1992. However, house prices fell slightly less in percentage terms, but were still down nearly three-tenths (29%) in the Nineties collapse.
Scotland
Like Northern Ireland, Scotland pretty much avoided the last property plunge. Sure, prices wobbled about a bit throughout the Nineties, but the trend never headed resolutely downwards. For the record, prices declined as follows:
Year |
Annual decline (%) |
---|---|
1992 |
-3.0 |
1994 |
-0.1 |
1997 |
-2.1 |
2000 |
-4.3 |
So, Scots managed to avoid the worst of the UK property depression, but this may not happen again this time around.
West Midlands
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q2 1989 |
68,931 |
Q2 1995 |
60,441 |
Difference (£) |
-8,490 |
Change (%) |
-12.3 |
Of all the regions of the UK, the West Midlands most closely reflects the results for the property market as a whole. Prices fell closely in line with the UK average, making this region perhaps the most ‘average' of all during the last crash.
Wales
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q1 1990 |
57,453 |
Q2 1995 |
49,674 |
Difference (£) |
-7,779 |
Change (%) |
-13.5 |
Prices didn't peak in Wales until Spring 1990, and then fell slightly more than the UK as a whole until they began to recover in late 1995. There's nothing remarkable to report here.
Yorkshire & Humberside
High/Low |
House price (£) |
---|---|
Q1 1991 |
55,928 |
Q3 1995 |
50,249 |
Difference (£) |
-5,679 |
Change (%) |
-10.2 |
Lastly, we come to the twelfth of our regions. Yorkshire folk have a well-deserved reputation for financial prudence. This may explains why Y&H it performed much better than any other English region, with prices declining by little more than a tenth (10%).
So, what conclusions can we draw from the above data? All it tells us is that the UK is far from being a single, homogeneous housing market. Regional differences will always prevail, because housing markets are primarily local beasts. Furthermore, this look back at the past doesn't help us to forecast the future. Then again, as Mark Twain is said to have remarked,
"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
More: Find your ideal mortgage via lovemoney.com | House prices double every 7 years?
Most Recent
Comments
-
Thanks Donna, nothing in particular to ask about regarding the article. I was just responding to Cliffs posts ( now deleted ) about not wanting to respond as the original article was published a couple of years back. That's his business and i have no problem with that. I enjoy reading his and other contributors articles. But i do believe that as long as an article is relevant and gets republished it is worth the time of the original writer to respond to any queries that may occur even after a couple of years. The passion and opinions expressed in an article by the author should never really diminish and should always be open to discussion as long as somebody out there wants to talk about it.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Apologies mymoneymatters, you certainly are not talking to yourself - we are listening! I think you make a good point. Unfortunately while Cliff is paid for his articles, he is not paid to respond to comments. That is entirely his choice. If I were you, I would post my question again, and that way even if Cliff isn't interested in answering it, someone else might.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Both my posts above were responses to posts put here by Cliff D'Arcy writing that he wasn't going to respond as the article was old and now Cliffs posts have been taken off. Makes it look like i'm talking to myself. Nothing new there i suppose.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
19 October 2010