Top

Why house price forecasts are dangerous


Updated on 15 November 2011 | 21 Comments

Forecasting is not just a bit of fun, it has serious destructive effects on a household's wealth.

Savills, the property services provider, has released another property forecast for 2012 and beyond. It's now forecasting a fall of 2% next year.

Shortly before 2010 started it forecast a 5.5% rise for 2012. You might say that clearly it now thinks this earlier forecast was completely wrong, although it has not put it that way itself. It has failed to mention it at all, in fact.

It has also conveniently failed to mention its previous record. I could pick on just about any forecaster, not just Savills, but since the real-estate company has provided our most recent prediction, let's look how its annual estimates have performed in recent history, by consulting my own database of hundreds of forecasts from dozens of professional and amateur forecasters:

  • In November 2008, Savills forecast a fall of 11% in 2009. Prices rose 6%.
  • Despite that, in November 2009, Savills forecast a remarkably precise fall of 6.6% in 2010. Prices went up a fraction.
  • In November 2010, Savills forecast around 3% falls for 2011. So far it's not on track, with prices up in the ten months to October. Savills requires achievable but large falls over the next two months for its prediction to be realised.

I used Nationwide's data for actual price changes, since its house-price index is the one most forecasting economists seem to prefer as standard, in my experience. Maybe Savills could squeeze better results from another index, but it doesn't look good for the property advisors.

The motivation for forecasting

The main reason we make self-assured forecasts is probably an innocent one. We're hard-wired to see patterns. Unfortunately, you can find all sorts of economic motifs looking back at the past few months or years, but those never seem to prove useful in predicting what will happen next.

Forecasting is also an easy way to get your company cheap publicity. Make a confident prediction and back it up with a few clear arguments and you'll get a good spot in all the national papers. Repeat in 6-12 months, brushing your last guess under the carpet.

We also, all of us, have lots of subconscious biases. You can see them at work every day. You'll read single-minded vitriol against a celebrity, because the columnist, who's never met her, is convinced she's lying about cheating on her boyfriend. You can also see it in a good number of readers' comments underneath articles, where you'll find good discussion and opposing ideas are confronted with rage and dismissiveness.

Forecasters want to believe they can accurately predict the future. They presumably close their minds to their previous records, and everyone else's. We all shut out things that don't suit our interests, beliefs or pride. We can only try to reduce subconscious bias by questioning our beliefs and ideologies. We won't always succeed but, the more we do, the richer our lives will be.

Forecasts have real impacts on our wealth

As entertaining as forecasts can be, it isn't all just a bit of fun. Professional forecasts have real impacts on people, who use them to make financial decisions.

There are those way back who saw the ominous pattern of entrails being convincingly laid out for them, who then waited for years and years for a crash, paying ever increasing rents, when they could be halfway through paying off their mortgages by now.

Then there are those who sell up when they shouldn't, with the backing of a few rational-sounding arguments and best hunches from a handful of firms who have appealed to and strengthened the readers' biases. Finally, there are those who buy when they shouldn't, all because of a barrage of erroneous predictions.

Making rational financial decisions

Forecasting is not harmless voodoo. There are victims. Lots of them. The unsatisfactory truth is that you can't rely on forecasts and that they may even bite you very badly. Buy or sell a few years too soon or too late and it can cost you tens of thousands of pounds over the course of your life.

Some people write glibly that forecasts are rubbish, but what the heck we've got no other way to make financial decisions, so let's use them anyway.

I think we can do better than that. I have written about a rational way to decide when to buy your home. It is also useful to think beyond this to other financial decisions. I looked for rational ways to choose a mortgage, for example, and there are simple ways to pick a savings account that cut out forecasting whether variable- or fixed-rate deals, or long or short ones, will turn out better.

My forecast

It's common for forecasters, be they professionals or readers commenting in the box below, to “amend”, “update” or - my personal favourite - “vary” their forecasts. One of the most common defences for these about-turns is “We were right, but the timing was off,” as if timeframes are not important to the wealth of property buyers, owners and sellers.

In its recent forecast, Savills acknowledged inflation's relationship to house prices. It said that house prices will be 6% higher in 2016, but that real prices will be 11% down. (Read about inflation in What are “real” prices?)

So my forecast is that, if house prices continue to rise with no big fall in the next few years, some of those who predicted falls will start saying “Ah, yes, but after adjusting for inflation, prices have fallen. That's what I meant all along. Ahem.” As if real falls and non-real (called “nominal”) falls are exactly the same, whereas in reality they have very different effects on homeowners, home sellers, hopeful first-time buyers, and others.

By the way, I'm not predicting prices will continue to rise over the next few years – I have no idea what will happen whatsoever. My forecast is just that, if they do rise, plenty of people's subconscious biases will lead them to cranking out excuses, and that real prices will be the main get-out.

How do you think those who are predicting no crash will “vary” their positions if prices fall significantly from here? Answers below please.

More: Compare mortgages through lovemoney.com | Switch energy before the shock bills rise | Five reasons a balance-transfer card isn't good for you

Use lovemoney.com'sinnovative new mortgage tool now to find the best mortgage for you online.

At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call freephone 0800 804 8045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.

Most Recent


Comments



  • 05 February 2016

    While I find your article to be insightful, I am going to have to respectfully disagree when you state, “Unfortunately, you can find all sorts of economic motifs looking back at the past few months or years, but those never seem to prove useful in predicting what will happen next.” While predictive analytics are not flawless they help users gain insight that leads to better decision-making. Predictive analytics are able to help users by identifying trends, finding the best properties, and targeting tenants. Identifying trends in the market will result in cost savings. This will help you determine whether or not an investment is worth pursuing. Predictive analytics also have the ability to show investors which home designs are popular. Homes that are in high demand will give you returns. Predictive analytics help investors target and identify tenants moving into a certain space. This is important for a number of reasons. You can now market towards specific tenants that will consistently bring you returns on your investment and you can predict how makeups of tenants will change in years to come. Do people want to rent places in the suburbs for extended periods of time? How long will they stay? Will the make up of these tenants completely change in the future? These are all questions that will help investors make wiser decisions when buying or selling property. Predictive analytics and forecasting models are constantly being improved throughout time. The National Association of Relaters has recently started a new predictive analytics group that looks at customer and member trends from a wider range of sources to help investors make better data driven investments. NAR Managing Director of Data Analytics, Todd Carpenter, in an interview stated, “By listening more to members and customers, organizations will be better able to meet their needs. NAR has a mountain of its own data, such as its monthly existing-home sales data, and relationships with other data sources. Analyzing this data will help us learn more about our members and their businesses and clients.” Their experiment has 3 phases. Right now NAR is just in its experimental phase. The next two phases consists of linking their organization with other data providers and then building products for their consumers. Ted Loring, chair of NAR’s Data Strategies committee argues that traditional analytics capture the big picture by studying and interpreting collected date. Customer relationship management captures the smaller picture. NAR plans on utilizing both the big and small picture to accurately predict what will occur in the future. Linking this information together can lay out a detailed picture. Loring states “NAR’s strategy going forward is to determine the strategy and initial objective, identify models worth emulating, assess existing Realtor resources, acquire and develop missing capabilities, run a pilot project, and then scale up.” While I agree that Professional forecasts can have negative impacts on people, who use them to make financial decisions, real estate is a risky business and Predictive models are by no means bulletproof. Predictive models simply exploit patterns and review data to give investors a better understanding of risks and opportunities of a transaction. Real estate transactions are always a gamble but reviewing past and present data will increase your chances of returns tremendously.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 16 November 2011

    You are spot on how on earth can "experts" forecast when house prices depend on so many factors such as location , demand or simply culture . For instance properties in parts of London have soared in value where as in other parts of the uk fallen dramatically . Either people want to buy to rent or to live and for too many years we have seen values escalate due to the rental market specially in London as so many want to live there. In short I agree with much of what you say.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 16 November 2011

    An excellent article. I take all forecasts with a pinch of salt. It does not mean they are not worth reading. When it comes to buying or selling property, the individual often has an overriding motive which has nothing to do with the state of the market. Yet it pays to do your research as others have said and if you have followed trends over a number of years, you might trust your gut instinct. In my own case, my decision making on property matters is definitely much better than it was when I was younger, because I have had good and bad experiences and I am better informed nowadays. I still say, 'you can't go wrong with London property', but I'm also aware of my own prejudice and counter it by being careful.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.