Gas costs, not green measures, to blame for energy prices
A new report into the impact of low carbon measures on energy bills says they have only accounted for 16% of recent price rises.
A new report by Government advisors says that wholesale gas prices are to blame for rising energy bills, not so-called environmental policy costs.
The Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has analysed the impact of meeting the Government’s carbon reduction targets on energy bills.
It looked at dual fuel bills where customers use gas for heating and electricity for power. It found that the average bill had increased by £455 per household over the past six years, from £605 in 2004 to £1,060 in 2010.
Of this increase, it says that £380 is due to a combination of wholesale gas prices and supplier costs, increasing transmission and distribution costs, and increases in VAT.
The remaining £75 was due to low carbon initiatives, with £30 to support investment in low carbon power generation and £45 for funding energy efficiency schemes for homes.
Electricity customers to be hardest hit
However, the CCC forecasts a £110 increase in bills by 2020, with £100 of that to support investment in low-carbon power and £10 to support energy efficiency in homes. It also predicts that £15 per household will be needed to support investment in the power grid.
Households that use electric heating are likely to be hit harder by low carbon measures, but households that don’t use gas or electricity for heating are likely to face the same increases as dual fuel customers.
In November, the Department of Energy and Climate Change estimated that low carbon measures would increase electricity costs by 27% by 2020.
Can these increases be offset?
The CCC suggests a number of initiatives could actually result in energy bills remaining roughly the same as they are today in ten years’ time. It recommends replacing boilers with modern, fuel efficient models, more insulation, more efficient use of heating controls and replacing lights and appliances with newer, more efficient models.
Consumer body Consumer Focus said it agreed with the findings of the report. But it argued that limiting the impact of low carbon costs on future energy bills through greater energy efficiency was “a pretty steep mountain to climb”.
It called for extra Government funding for energy efficiency measures, increased funding for schemes for households affected by fuel poverty and greater transparency from energy companies. It also said that new competition in the energy market would help lower prices.
The Government is due to launch its Green Deal in October 2012, offering loans and subsidies to help make homes more energy efficient.
But Consumer Focus is urging people, particularly those over 70 or receiving benefits, to take advantage of current grants and subsidies on offer. You can find out more about these at the Energy Saving Trust's website
Friends of the Earth called for the Government to investigate the ‘Big Six’ energy companies and “their role in keeping the UK hooked on expensive fossil fuels”.
Industry regulator Ofgem recently published a series of proposals aimed at simplifying bills and tariffs for energy customers.
Want to switch suppliers? Use lovemoney.com's gas and electricity tool to compare tariffs.
More: Energy complaints soar following price rises | Government slashes feed-in tariff benefits
Most Recent
Comments
-
I used to work as a home energy adviser and my advice (based on my figures) was not to replace an existing (functioning) boiler with a more efficient one, because the savings over the ten year life of the new boiler are less than its cost. The new high efficienncy boilers do have a life of about ten years, whereas my Potterton Neataheat profile (70% efficient) is over 20 years old and still going strong. This would never happen with a modern condensing boiler. I made sure that it had treated water (Fernox) from day1. The modern high efficiency boilers are like formula 1 racing cars and the old boilers are like a family car. So the former have many more parts, work in a much more complicated way, the parts are more expensive, fault diagnosis is more difficult etc etc etc Insulation is a better way of reducing heating costs and it has no moving parts. However, improved insulation needs good heating controls in order to save money efficiently.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
If you belive that you will belive anything! Who do you think pays people 41p a unit to generate electricty on their roof when it is worth a fraction of that ? Why do rich landowners suddenly install windfarms on their land? because it is tax free and subsidised by us lot. The Chinese, from whom we buy many of our goods now, build coal power stations because they are reliable and cheap. We buy their goods which are made using caol powered electricty yet we do not see the green loonies rioting about boycotting these nasty Chinese goods made with harmfully generated electricty , do we? No hypocrisly rules. The people of UK are being scarificed in the name of green energy, people will die through this and the green lobby love it, especially those making a lot of money, with blood on it.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
See how cleverly they look at a long period back to 2004. The green energy costs have only recently kicked in so its percentage is low over that period but if we were to look at its share of the current and future price increases, it would tell a very different story. It is pure spin from the Department of Energy and Climate change.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
19 December 2011