Top

Huge increases in railway station car park charges


Updated on 13 January 2012 | 3 Comments

Some station car park tickets have gone up in price by up to 33%.

It’s been a bad start to 2012 for rail commuters who also park at the station they travel in from. Not only have annual rail season tickets risen by an average of 5.9%, but station car park season tickets have increased by up to 10%.

And if you travel in less frequently, you’ll face an even greater increase, with some daily charges rising by up to 33% and monthly tickets going up by up to 20%.

The Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) accused train company Southeastern of implementing the highest increase. There was a 33% increase in daily charges at Robertsbridge in East Sussex, from £3 to £4, the daily charge at Kidbrooke, in south-east London, increased from £3.50 to £4.50 and there was an increase from £5.50 to £6 a day at Ashford International.

And it now costs £1,345 a year to park at Sevenoaks station in Kent, an increase of £92.50.

Elsewhere, the daily charge at East Midlands Parkway station near Nottingham, operated by East Midlands Trains, has risen from £6 to £6.50. And it’s the same story at Wokingham in Berkshire, run by South West Trains.

The TSSA accused train companies of using the parking increases to claw back some of the money it lost when the Government lowered the cap on fare increases.

Southeastern defended the increases, saying: “Any increase is also to pay for the continued cost of running the car parks including CCTV, maintenance, rising utility bills and rental costs to Network Rail."

Some people living near stations have responded to the high parking charges by offering commuters the chance to rent a space on their driveway.

Renting a spot from people on sites such as parkatmyhouse.com, parkonmydrive.com and yourparkingspace.co.uk can reduce your parking bill by up to two thirds.

More: How to cut the cost of your train fare | Renting a car is cheaper than buying one

For the latest news and comment on the stories that affect your money, follow us on Twitter

Most Recent


Comments



  • 15 January 2012

    Motorists have been trapped by their own belief in the car as a personal freedom. It is actually the exact opposite and is their prison and they are going to be perpetually paying out more to get out of that same prison. It will only get worse. Planers encouraged developements of green field sites out of town which required cars to live a normal life. The car was becoming cheaper to buy so everyone was happy. the government have long since relaised that the motorist is now trapped by owning a car and cannot get out of it easily, so you just increase taxation endlessly. The councils are at it too with car parking, next you will find supermarkets charge you to park. It would only take one to start and the others would follow, I think it will come. Also be a economic growth to Cameron as you may need eastern european labour employed , cheaply of course, to patrol them. You see.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 14 January 2012

    i am not a regular rail passenger and am fortunate enough to live within walking distance of my local station so i am not personally affected by these car park charges. however i find it completely unacceptable that when a commuter buys a season ticket, where they are paying in advance of using the service, complementary car parking is not included in the price. this is just another example where the car is treated as the enemy and is regarded as an easy target for income. i suppose the situation is exacerbated when the commuter also suffers an uncomfortable journey. it would be interesting to know how the cost of giving all commuters free parking would compare to the cost of HS2.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 13 January 2012

    Another case of finding a captive audience and screwing them for every penny. In the days when we had a lot of trains and communities were smaller most people lived within walking distance of their local station. Communities grew and sprawled and stations disappeared. In order to use the train (a good thing) people had to take to buses or drive themselves to the station. Of course they had to leave their cars somewhere so they parked on the surrounding streets which sometimes caused congestion or annoyed local residents who thought they had the right to park on them. Councils responded with yellow paint but didn't think it was up to them to provide commuter parking. In the meantime bits of spare track and sidings were being ripped up and the railway companies gleefully turned the land into car parks. You can work out the rest. Bus services once privatised became less available. Commuter land spread further and further from the city centres and massive new housing developments were built to feed the commuter needs. Take the Medway towns as an example. These developments were not serviced by decent public transport so commuters took to their cars of course. So while we want travellers to use public transport, specifically the railways, there is no strategic plan to help them use the service.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.