How to combat rising mortgage rates

We look at why the Bank of England expects mortgage rates to rise again soon, and what you can do about it.
Half a year ago, the Bank of England confidently predicted mortgage lenders would increase their rates in early 2012. Time has proven it right.
Mortgage borrowers are facing increases this month, we explained Million borrowers face jump in mortgage repayments.
Many people on standard variable rate (SVR) mortgages, and others looking for new short-term mortgage deals, will have seen their mortgages rise by half a percentage point or more.
Overall, around 10% of borrowers will already have to find hundreds of pounds extra a year.
Now, the Bank of England has said that “some further increase in mortgage rates is likely”.
Why the Bank of England expects more mortgage increases
Banks don't just lend us money, they borrow money themselves to ensure they always have large enough reserves and so that they can meet any spikes in cash withdrawals. They also lend out far more than they've got in customers' deposits.
High-street banks can borrow at the Bank of England base rate. They have been able to pay a historic low interest rate of 0.5% for more than three years now.
However, banks that are short of funds also borrow from other banks that have excess cash.
At present, there don't appear to be many banks with much money to lend to their chums, so those that can are charging higher interest rates. Indeed, while the base rate has stayed the same, banks are charging each other between 20% and 80% more than a year ago, sometimes at more than double the base rate.
In addition, if banks are expecting interest rates to rise in general, this pushes up the rates they charge each other sooner, in a partially self-fulfilling prophecy.
All these costs are passed on to us customers.
For more, check out Eurozone crisis pushing up mortgage rates.
Customers can also push up prices
I'm worried that many borrowers with not much wiggle room in their budgets have been too complacent.
I've been warning for the past few years that mortgage rates can rise before the Bank of England increases its base rate, and more swiftly too. The small increase we've just seen is a gentle demonstration of that.
Lenders increase mortgage rates for plenty of reasons, such as the cost of borrowing from each other and because they expect rates to rise in the foreseeable future.
Customers can also push up prices more rapidly. If we all simultaneously believe mortgage rates are due to rise, hundreds of thousands of us might suddenly go for long-term fixed deals at the same time.
Few taking part in that surge should expect to get the cheapest deals. Lenders will close them down when they rapidly hit their targets. Many customers might not even get the next best price, or the third best.
As quick as you might be to apply, your application form might be buried so far down the pile that by the time you find out what mortgage rate you can get, you have a dilemma: do you fix at that much higher price you're offered, or hang on to the rollercoaster of short-term mortgage deals and standard variable rates?
My view is unchanged
Today, there is no such dilemma. As I have been writing for the past couple of years, ten-year fixed rate mortgages cost around half the average mortgage rate of the past 40 years or so.
These mortgages are dirt cheap. Imagine paying less than half the interest rate on your mortgage than your parents did on theirs. You're looking at saving thousands of pounds in comparison, perhaps tens of thousands.
Ten-year deals offer you all that with no risk of an increase, and no gnawed fingers every two years as you try to guess the future. If, in your circumstances, you can fix for ten years, you should strongly consider it.
Five-, six- and seven-year deals come with less safety but are even cheaper, so they make good alternatives if you have issues with fixing for ten years.
You can see current prices for five- to ten-year deals in the tables at the bottom of the article: Why long-term fixed-rate mortgages are getting cheaper.
I make no forecasts
Let me be clear: I'm not predicting mortgage rates will sky rocket soon, especially with the International Monetary Fund calling on the Bank of England to be ready to lower its base rate even further.
Nor am I saying that long-term deals will save you more than short-term ones over the next decade.
I make no forecast whatsoever. It's too difficult.
But, if there's ever a time to buy a long-term fixed rate, I think it's now, when they're at historical lows. That's a fact, not a prediction.
An alternative to long-term fixes
If you can't fix for ten years or even five years, or you just don't want to, a great alternative is to use this opportunity, before further mortgage rate rises, to overpay your mortgage, or to save a pot in order to do so in the near future.
For each £1,000 you overpay this year, you'll probably save an extra £500 to £1,200 in interest payments over the course of your mortgage, if you've still got more than half to go.
Bear in mind that you'll probably be better off overpaying your other debts first, because they have higher interest rates.
More on mortgages and property:
How are mortgage rates decided?
Why you should beware the best buy mortgage tables
What to do if you're at risk of repossession
Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks launch fee-free mortgages for small deposits
Why the NewBuy scheme isn't working
Most Recent
Comments
-
Thanks Alan I mentioned in the article that 10-year mortgages must suit your circumstances and wishes, to cover my back. It's also why I presented five-year deals as an alternative that might suit people more. All our situations are different, which is why it's hard to say how many people are in the circumstances where a ten-year deal is good for them. My opinion is that, provided you bought at a time, and in a place, where it was sensible to do so for your own circumstances, then getting a ten-year mortgage should also be quite a reasonable thing to do. Many people don't buy at a time or place where it is sensible and this is what is most likely to cause problems with a ten-year deal. Homebuyers overstretch themselves, or they buy with the intention of trading up in just a few short years, or they buy when they have a good chance of losing their jobs and have difficult prospects of quickly getting a new one, or they buy when they're likely to need to move to another location soon because their jobs are very fluid, and so on. Those are all problems caused by choosing to buy in the first place when perhaps they shouldn't. Choosing a ten-year mortgage deal isn't the cause of the problem, but it could compound it. That said, many mortgages are portable, including ten-year deals, so if something deeply unexpected happens you might have the option to move house and take the mortgage with you. Two risks are that your financial situation deteriorates or the lender makes its mortgage approval criteria more strict. Both of which could lead to your lender refusing to move your mortgage. http://www.lovemoney.com/news/property-and-mortgages/mortgages/12118/lenders-preventing-mortgage-transfers Another potential problem if you have to move sooner is that you need another mortgage on top to make up a shortfall, but the top-up mortgage is expensive. Potentially, you might find it would have been cheaper if you had a shorter mortgage deal, so that you could wait till it expires and then buy a new property with a single mortgage at a cheaper rate. (Personally, I don't think I'd let that particular argument stop me getting a ten-year deal though.) If circumstances force you to move to another area, you could also rent out your property and rent in the new area until the deal expires. It's a complicated option with lots to consider, but worth thinking about. Neil
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I like the article Neil, but how a 10 year fixed rate motgage may suit a younger person, I am not sure? I have a 10 year fixed rate mortgage with Newcastle Building Soc. Which I am happy with...5 years left then its paid off, but the penalties to change to another deal from 1 to 9 years are eye watering (high to low sliding scale) the last year there is no penalty...please read the small print
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
29 May 2012