Government reconsidering £140 State Pension plan

Reports suggest the Government is getting cold feet over its £140 State Pension revamp.

The Government is having a rethink of its plans to introduce a flat-rate £140 State Pension.

According to a report in the Financial Times, the Government has only just realised that many people will lose out – or at least not benefit – from the changes. As a result, Prime Minister David Cameron has put the brakes on the reforms.

How things work at the moment

The table below outlines the Basic State Pension various people can qualify for:

Circumstances

Basic State Pension per week

Single man or woman

£107.45

Married man or woman or civil partner, who qualify with their own National Insurance contributions

£107.45

Married man, woman or civil partner using his wife’s her husband’s or their civil partner’s National Insurance contributions record

£64.40

 

There is a ‘triple lock’ in place to work out how much that should increase each year. The State Pension jumps depending on which is the highest of the growth in average earnings, the rate of inflation or 2.5%.

However, there’s also an additional State Pension to think about. It’s had all sorts of different names in the past, including State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme, and is money from the Government on top of the State Pension. How much you get depends on your earnings.

And then there’s Pension Credit, which is available to poorer pensioners, and bumps up the State Pension to nearly £140 a week.

The whole system is complicated and confusing, which is why the idea of a single flat rate was a popular idea.

The planned reforms

Under the reforms, the second State Pension element would be ditched entirely, with the State Pension bumped up to £140 a week.

For more, you can read State Pension to jump by £40 a week

Not everyone benefits

The problem with the planned reforms is that there will be losers. For starters, existing pensioners won’t qualify for the flat rate. And given older people are far more likely to vote than younger people, the Government clearly feels uneasy about angering them, particularly after the Granny Tax farce earlier this year.

Those who previously would have benefitted from the additional State Pension are also unlikely to be big fans of the reforms.

What happens now?

It’s no secret that the Government has been concerned about the cost of welfare reform. That’s why the Prime Minister supposedly tried to move Iain Duncan Smith, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, in the reshuffle.

Back in July the Government announced the White Paper on pension reform had been postponed until the autumn. That paper is still expected to be published, though reports suggest it will be “consultative rather than prescriptive”, highlighting alternative options.

More on pensions:

Auto enrolment: how NEST will invest your compulsory pension

Saving in a pension? You are as well off on benefits

Annuity rates cut 23 times since July!

Cut the cost of passing on your pension

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.