How Private Medical Insurance Worked For Me

A personal experience recently made Serena Cowdy take a closer look at her private medical insurance. This is her verdict.
I used to think that private medical insurance (PMI) was an obscure employment perk that, as a young and healthy individual, I would probably never need.
Recently, however, I had cause to claim on the PMI I was given by my employer. And I ended up being extremely glad that ‘obscure’ benefit was part of the package.
Here, I’m going to outline how PMI worked for me. I’m also going to examine the pros and cons so you can decide whether it’s right for you.
How PMI worked for me
I’ve suffered headaches, on and off, since I was a teenager. However, earlier this year they got markedly worse. They would last for three or four days on end, always seeming to stem from behind my left eye. They would regularly be accompanied by flashing or tunnel vision, dizziness and feelings of nausea.
I visited my local GP. He said he had no idea what was causing them, but frankly, didn’t seem overly concerned.
When I pushed him, he said he could refer me to an NHS neurologist. However, he emphasised that this could take several months, and at the end of it all, they were unlikely to give me an MRI scan anyway because, in his words, they cost the NHS an arm and a leg.
That was the moment I decided to claim on the BUPA PMI I had through my main job.
The process was not without hitches. I had to get various forms signed by my GP presumably to prove that he deemed referral to a specialist necessary.
And there was also a sticky moment when someone from BUPA told me that I probably wouldn’t be covered anyway because my headaches were a pre-existing condition. My argument was that they’d suddenly got a lot more frequent and severe.
In the end, BUPA agreed to cover the cost of the specialist, and for the MRI if he deemed one necessary but not the cost of any treatment that might subsequently be needed.
I could live with this, I decided, because if the MRI did uncover any nasties I could run screaming to the NHS with a pretty strong case to be treated right away.
Once the paperwork was sorted, I was zoomed into a private appointment with a Harley Street neurologist within a week.
He, too, admitted he couldn’t pinpoint the cause of the headaches, and said an MRI would be advisable ‘if only to put my mind at rest’. In another couple of days, I was strapped into a scanner having my brain zapped.
And the result? Thankfully, everything was normal. There were no worrying lumps, and no (apparent) brain abnormalities. I was even given a fascinating CD - images of my head’s internal workings from every conceivable angle.
So the dreaded ‘tumour’ possibility had been eliminated. Tension was cited as the most likely cause of my headaches, but perhaps I’ll never know for sure.
The pros and cons of PMI
In light of my recent experience, the following points spring to mind:
Exclusions and loopholes: When deciding whether PMI is for you, you do have to scrutinise all the exclusions that apply.
There are usually a host of things that aren’t covered. These can include pre-existing conditions (as in my case), incurable or lifelong conditions, mental health problems, treatment for HIV/AIDS, and treatment overseas - to name but a few.
The frills: Private medical care does undoubtedly come with some luxurious extras. I got to sit in a lovely plush consultant’s surgery, surrounded by flowers and antiques.
Personally, I didn’t really care - and that free CD was illuminating, but certainly not essential. However, if I had been somewhere longer-term -- as an overnight patient for example -- perhaps I would have appreciated these frills a little more.
The bits that count: For me, the three main plus points of PMI were the speed with which I got a specialist appointment, the willingness to perform expensive diagnostic procedures, and the opportunity to get a second opinion.
When no one knew what was wrong with me, and I had got myself into a ‘worst-case scenario’ panic, BUPA was willing to put my mind at rest - for a price.
The verdict
Well, PMI still won’t be the highest priority on my insurance list. I do believe the NHS is fundamentally a sound and admirable service.
Most private practitioners are, in fact, NHS medics boosting their income. And I don’t believe the level of treatment I received was superior to the NHS equivalent.
However, I was scared and I wanted a quick and conclusive diagnostic result, if only to eliminate the one scenario (a tumour) that I feared the most. For me, that’s where PMI came up trumps.
So, would I take out PMI if it wasn’t part of a company package? To be honest, I’m not sure. I operate on a pretty tight budget, and at the moment, I think I have higher financial priorities.
However, I will definitely be scrutinising employment contracts more carefully in the future.
Some employers may pay for PMI for you or even for your whole family. So understanding your company benefits could make a huge difference if a loved one falls ill.
And finally, if your employer doesn't have a scheme, see if your partner's company will allow you to join theirs - many now do.
For me, peace of mind is definitely worth that much.
This is an updated version of an older article
Most Recent
Comments
-
It is horses for courses I don't have PMI but did go private when I was unhappy with the diagnosis of my Dr over having slightly high blood pressure. So I paid to see a specialist privately. The only real advantage with going private is if you want or need to be seen quickly.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
My husband and I used to have PMI through our companies but when we decided to set up our own businesses, other financial things took priority. Two months ago he completely ruptured his Achilles Tendon, after being badly misdiagnosed by his GP (who did not suggest correct treatment for the Tendonitus which was a pre-cursor). [br/]After the rupture, the local NHS A&E were brilliant (despite it being a rather unsavoury experience late on a Friday night in a Central London A&E) and we were impressed to be told he could go into hospital the following Monday (3 days later). However, they could not say when the op would be - could be up to a week later ! Neither of us can afford that kind of latency with our businesses plus the sooner the op took place the better for his recovery. So we opted to pay for him to go private and he had the op within 24 hours of having the rupture. [br/]We were fortunate to have savings which have been severly dented and the costs continue to rack up with follow-up consultant appointments etc, but we do not regret paying for it for one minute. Have to admit also that MRSA was a fear although have heard that stats are improving - can't afford to take any risks when it comes to our health as if we don't work, we don't earn. We are also convinced that his treatment would have been different on the NHS to private (plaster cast v. 'Airboot' - latter much easier to get about on for the 3 months following the rupture)[br/]Have since taken out PMI for both of us (somewhat after bolting horses and all that...) through the broker recommended on the Fool site and can heartily recommend them. [br/]It was a salutory lesson for us as we'd have still been better off if we'd taken out PMI 2 years ago and been paying all the premiums since. That's life.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
The other alternative to consider is paying for private care yourself and saving the cost of PMI. [br/]A private MRI scan only costs £200 which is about 1 months premium for a middle aged person. If it shows something that need treatment then the NHS takes over. The NHS will offer a service equal or better than most private hospitals for serious or urgent contitions. [br/]The MRSA fear is something BUPA plays on in its ads. It doesnt apply to scans anyway and only applys in private hospitals because they deal with less seriously ill patients.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
26 August 2008