The Government Must Guarantee Savings!

Ireland has given savers a 100% government-backed guarantee, with France set to follow. The Fool says it's high time that Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling did the same.
For investors, yesterday was a day to forget. Growing fears over the health of the global financial system caused stock markets to tumble. The blue-chip FTSE 100 index dived 270 points (5.3%), one of the biggest falls since its creation in April 1984. After the vote-down of the $700 billion US bank bailout, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 778 points (7%), its biggest one-day points drop ever.
Irish eyes aren't smiling...
With inter-bank lending almost frozen solid, banks in the UK, US and Europe were among the biggest casualties. In particular, Irish banks have been left reeling, as the following table shows:
Financial firm | Share-price change (%) on 29/09/08 |
---|---|
-45 | |
Irish Life | -34 |
Allied Irish Banks | -16 |
Bank of Ireland | -15 |
These steep falls come in spite of a promise from the Irish government to beef up the savings safety-net. On 20 September, the upper limit for the Irish deposit-guarantee scheme was increased from _20,000 to _100,000. However, this news failed to `stop the rot', forcing the Irish government into an even bigger promise.
...but Irish savers are now 100% safe
Today, the Irish government agreed to guarantee all deposits and debts at these six major financial firms:
Allied Irish Banks
Bank of Ireland
Educational BS
Irish Life and Permanent
Irish Nationwide BS
This guarantee is effective immediately and ends in September 2010. According to the Financial Times, it covers _400bn of liabilities, including retail, commercial and inter-bank deposits, plus covered bonds, senior debt and dated subordinated debt. This guarantee will be paid for by a levy on the banks concerned.
Thus, the Irish government has put its full faith and credit behind Ireland's largest banks. Last week, Ireland became the first euro-zone country to go into recession, so this guarantee will come as a welcome relief to worried savers. In addition, I understand that the French President promised to protect French savers from the turmoil in world markets. So, we could get a formal extension to the French deposit-guarantee scheme later this week.
British savers demand the same security
A week ago, in Savers Get A Stronger Safety-Net, I urged the British government to follow suit by strengthening the protection afforded by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS). At present, the FSCS protects only the first £35,000 of savings with a single institution (£70,000 for joint accounts).
According to the banks, this £35,000 threshold fully protects 24 out of 25 savings accounts (96%). Alas, savers with much larger sums (such as pensioners and older savers) could still lose out if a bank went bust. Then again, by intervening to save both Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley, the government has given an implied guarantee to savings institutions.
It's now time to make this promise clear-cut. Therefore, I believe the government has no choice but to issue a blanket guarantee to protect 100% of all savings deposits, regardless of their size, in return for a fee from banks for this protection.
Hence, in a press release issued today, The Motley Fool has called on the government to safeguard savers by providing a government-backed guarantee for all UK savings accounts of any size.
Without this guarantee, we think Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling are selling British savers short!
More: Find first-rate savings accounts | The Facts About The Savings Guarantee | Don't Panic If You Save With B&B
Most Recent
Comments
-
Goodtyneguy has it right. If everything goes "pear Shaped" then our money will be as good as that in Zimbabwee or of some countries during world war 2. The £35,000/£50,000 won't be worth anything at all due to the fact that we will have rampant inflation and the government will just print money to pay us the £35,000 plus, that is of course if you can ever get to speak to a human being on the phone to get the necessary forms to obtain your money or get to the front of the enormous queue at your bank, which, in an emergency would close its doors anyway. The only thing to help the situation is not to panic, diversify as much as possible - you might as well buy that house abroad now its cheap (I am told that house prices are still increasing in the Ukraine - due to the Olympics going there in 2018?)or book and pay for that ABTA bonded holiday etc. At least we will have the consolation of knowing that the people who drove down the cost of shares in HBOS only to buy them back cheaply again will have money that is as worthless as ours (just more of it). Looking on the bright side, during world war 2 people seemed to smile more, even if they had nothing. They still went to the theatre and dances at the NAFI canteen and everyone seemed to help everyone else because they were all in the same boat. So I'll see you all down at the pub where we can drown our sorrows, because you won't be able to get into your bank.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Can anyone clarify this for me please? I have a u.k. limited company with a saving and a current accounts with Abbey. I believe Abbey is safer than most but will both accounts be covered by the Govts £50k guarantee ? if not and I transferred to an Irish bank in the u.k. would both current and deposit accounts be covered by the Irish Govts unlimited guarantee ?[br/][br/]Thanks
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
"the only reason I know for that is so a spoken promise can be reneged upon" There is another possible reason, well known to anyone who has a real economy to manage - that as soon as a politician or official says anything specific that the market fancies betting against, he is dead in the water. GB is in a cat and mouse game and his caginess may just be because he doesn't want to give any hostages to fortune. The market says it wants HMG to help, but we all know it will chew its own leg off if there's nothing tastier for breakfast tomorrow morning (or any other morning).
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
05 October 2008