Budget 2013: what should George Osborne do?

I think George Osborne could get the economy growing more quickly if he cut VAT.
I’ve already written about what I expect the Chancellor to announce in this year's Budget speech.
Now I’d like to look quickly at what I think the Chancellor should do in his Budget.
Too much austerity
My view is that Osborne has given us too much austerity since 2010. Spending is too low and taxes are too high. If we’re going to get the ecomomy moving again, Osborne should cut VAT from 20% to 16%.
He should cut VAT to 16% and get the economy moving again.
Justification
Osborne justifies his austerity policy with two arguments:
1. If an individual hits financial problems, he/she should cut their spending to get back on track. Surely a government should follow the same approach?
2. Long-term interest rates will allegedly rise if the Government switches from its austerity policy.
However, individuals aren’t the same as economies. The difference is that if a government cuts spending, the economy can then suffer, and then tax receipts can fall. So tax revenue falls as government spending falls, and the deficit doesn’t contract as fast as Osborne had expected.
In my view, tax cuts and spending increases will boost the economy. More economic growth will boost tax revenue for the government and also mean lower welfare spending as more people will have jobs. In the medium term, my approach will actually reduce the deficit more quickly than Osborne’s austerity policy.
Don’t get me wrong, my approach isn’t appropriate in all circumstances. Government spending increases can sometimes trigger inflation.
Spending increases can also ‘crowd out’ the private sector. In other words, companies can’t grow as fast they would like because the higher government borrowing is driving up interest rates.
But right now, long-term interest rates are extremely low and I don’t see any sign of change there. What’s more, there’s plenty of spare capacity in the economy – so increased Government spending won’t push up inflation.
Granted, a 4% cut would initially cost around £20 billion a year in lost revenue for the Government. But because it would boost the economy, I suspect it would actually improve the Government’s finances over a three- or four-year period.
But it's not going to happen...
I realise that a 4% cut in VAT is highly unlikely. And even if it did happen, I’m not suggesting that it would be a miracle cure that would solve all our problems.
But it would be worth doing. It would help.
Don't forget you can follow the 2013 Budget speech live here on lovemoney from 12.30pm GMT on Wednesday.
More on the Budget
Budget 2013: what will George Osborne do?
Budget 2013: what do you want to hear?
George Osborne brings forward State Pension and care reforms
Most Recent
Comments
-
Beer duty down! Time to drown ones sorrows that the chancellor currently gets a third if not more of the cost of each pint you have. Notice how the news keeps going on about income tax thresholds planned for next year, pension as of 2016....and Sunday's beer duty cut. What about the rest of the budget? Dumb news for the sheep of the nation. What about the tax breaks to people selling businesses to their employees/pals? The levy on the banks? I repeat. The government is not fit for purpose.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I know I will probably get jumped on for saying this but I read that International Aid will be unaffected which I don't understand really. If an individual has a large credit card bill in arrears for example and the the credit company are chasing would you advise them to give what you had available to pay off what is owed and get out of trouble or give it away? I am not saying to stop International Aid altogether but I think it should at least be looked at.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
It really makes no difference what goes into a budget as the people in power pass all increases on to us at the bottom of the heap,If he increases vat it will only mean bigger expense claims,therefore we will pay in the end.Lets have a government that is on a fixed,realistic wage,minimal expenses,and perhaps they might understand how the country feels. The other point to my ramblings is why do we need politicians the cant take a breath without permission from the EU gravy train members.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
20 March 2013