Will It Be A Happy HIP-ness?

Thinking of selling your home? You may find you need to put that "For Sale" sign away until your Home Information Pack is ready.
Well, there's been a glimmer of good news recently regarding the country's property situation. After months of horror headlines regarding house prices, figures released last week by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) revealed that at least the number of people looking to buy a home hit a two-year high last month.
Of course, there are two sides to the coin. The reason many of those people have decided the time is right to buy is due to the increased level of forced sales and repossessions that are, in turn, pushing down prices. So while you have thought buying a home was out of your league financially a year ago, things may be different now.
Drop-Dead Date
However, anyone planning to sell should be aware that ministers have tightened up legislation regarding the much-condemned Home Information Packs (Hips).
Sellers can currently market their property as soon as they have commissioned their HIP, and they have up to 28 days to do so while they wait to receive it.
However, as of 6 April 2009 (the so-called Drop Dead Date) buyers cannot put up those "For Sale" signs until all of the key documents for their HIP are in place (although they will still be given 28-days grace for a few items including property searches).
What's more, the packs are to be made bigger, with the inclusion of a Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ), requiring information on the risk of flooding, gas and electricity safety, service charges, parking arrangements and details of any structural damage. Anyone not complying with the rules could find themselves fined up to £200.
In the beginning......
The original idea behind the Home Information Pack was that it should contain everything a buyer needs to purchase a property. That included a property survey known as a Home Condition Report (HCR).
If everything was in the pack, buyers would quickly be able to decide whether or not a property was worth even viewing, let alone putting an offer on. And that would result in less wasted time.
While the pack obviously burdened the seller with extra costs, this would effectively be cancelled out by him not having to pay for these items when the time came for him to buy.
Problems
The problem is various about-turns by the government have resulted in the pack being massively scaled-down (indeed it doesn't even need to include what many regarded as the only useful part, the HCR).
It is argued that as potential buyers must still pay hundreds of pounds for a property survey, why saddle the seller with paying between £300 and £600 for a HIP? Does anyone actually care how many energy efficient light bulbs there are in their potential home? And with properties struggling to sell full stop, shouldn't we be considering suspending HIPs in a bid to help things get moving again?
It's a difficult one. While I can see how the original idea had good intentions, there are just too many potential problems. And while I do see the relevance of having extra information regarding flood risk and parking arrangements, is it really fair to make sellers fork out hundreds of pounds for this all to be placed in a shiny folder? Has the time come to bow out gracefully, or start thinking of an alternative?
On a more positive note, Margaret Beckett's new measures did state that she felt it was important that both home buyers and sellers get a good service from professionals working in the industry. She revealed that the government would be welcoming the Office of Fair Trading's study into how home buying and selling works, as well as looking at competition between service providers and how consumer interests are served. We at the Fool will be watching the outcome of this study, with much interest, too.
Compare mortgages with The Motley Fool Mortgage Service
Most Recent
Comments
-
shortfall: Look, I'm not that edumacated but surely everyone knows that if a government, through bad policies, find they are in a financial mess will need to raise extra funds. HIPS, like many other changes, are introduced to ballance the books. It's a good job that people like myself started saving years ago to bolster our pensions (sic). Our government Proves that frugality and thriftness is not the best policy (many say renting -doing a bit 'ere and there and living life to the full is best - you will never be homeless, and you will still be entitled to a pension) So why don't I just buckle down and accept that those like me, for the last 40 years, who prefer to work hard and not even think of claiming a penny of the state accept that we will always make up the deficit?
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I have been considering moving but since Hips is now considered a must in order to do so I have decided to stay put. Perhaps in the next election there is a change of Government and maybe, just maybe Hips will be abandoned, then I will seriously consider moving. Hopefully I won't be to old to enjoy a downsized property. Having read all the comments above there doesn't seem to be anything in its favour. A compete waste of money and time with no insurances whatsoever. A survey still has to be done for security.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I'm pleased that so many other people agree that HIP's are a disaster. I know that most of the Fools who comment on these articles don't do so on the discussion boards, and I assume they probably don't read them, either. However, as there's clearly a lot of interest in HIP's I thought some of you might be interested in a more detailed decsription of just how bloody useless they are that I posted recently - http://boards.fool.co.uk/Message.asp?mid=11337393 Merry Hip-free Christmas to all!
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
20 December 2008