A Brighter Future For Britain's Energy Customers

After a year of price increases, Ofgem and the government seem determined to tackle unfair energy pricing. But will they really make a difference?
There's little doubt that 2008 has been a dreary year for Britain's energy customers. The average household's annual gas and electricity bill has rocketed by around 40% since January -- so it now stands at more than £1,200.
What's more, the shocking price hikes imposed by suppliers this summer have pushed an alarming number of people into fuel poverty (i.e. more than 10% of that person's annual household income is spent on energy bills). Consumer Focus, the new energy watchdog, suggests that around 5 million households are currently in this situation.
In addition, as I reported back in October, Ofgem has highlighted a number of unfair billing methods being used by energy companies to plump up their profits:
- Households that get their electricity from a company which was formerly the key supplier in their area are likely to pay around 10% more than new customers who live elsewhere.
- `Medium' gas and electricity users with pre-payment meters (PPMs) pay an average of £125 more per year for their fuel than those who pay by direct debit.
- `Medium use' customers who pay their energy bills quarterly in arrears (by `standard credit') pay £80 more per year than those who use direct debit.
Predictably, these problems have hit Britain's most vulnerable consumers hardest -- such as those on low incomes and the elderly.
A brighter future
However, it could be that the start of a new year will also be the start of a fairer deal for all of us on energy.
Britain's `Big Six' suppliers -- British Gas, NPower, E.ON, EDF, Scottish Power and Scottish and Southern Energy -- have now accepted Ofgem's finding that "many disadvantaged households are paying unfair prices". As such, they have agreed to address the issues identified by the regulator.
New information released this week shows that, since Ofgem's energy probe began in February, around £300 million has been shaved off the excessive premiums paid by PPM users. This has gone some way to making the bills of these customers fairer.
Further cuts of around £200 million are expected to be made from the bills of households who have no access to gas, and those who miss out on the best deals for other reasons.
In addition, there are hopes that everyone's energy costs will fall in early 2009 because the price of oil -- blamed for this summer's steep price increases -- has now plummeted. Many MPs have expressed serious concern that drops in the wholesale price of gas and electricity have not been passed on to consumers, and the Big Six are under increasing pressure to act from Energy Secretary Ed Miliband.
Left out in the cold
I hate to be pessimistic -- especially at this time of year! But in my opinion, Britain's energy suppliers still fall a long way short of offering customers a fair deal.
Ofgem has stated that the £200 million worth of price cuts yet to be delivered by the Big Six are taking too long to pass on. In fact, the regulator is so concerned about the pace of reform that it may refer the companies to the Competition Commission in January, and is now moving to make unfair billing illegal.
Ed Miliband has expressed his support for a change in the way energy suppliers are licensed -- a move that could ban companies from charging "unjustified" prices for gas and electricity. However, such a drastic measure is unlikely to be implemented immediately. This means that, in the meantime, some of us are will continue to be short-changed by our energy suppliers.
Furthermore, I think the hope that hefty price cuts are on the horizon for energy customers could be disappointed. As I explained in this article, energy suppliers have made it clear that a sustained decrease in the cost of gas and electricity will be required before consumers can feel any benefit -- and as always, companies continue to insist there's a significant `time lag' between them buying energy and us using it, which justifies their reluctance to pass on the savings they seem to be making.
Hope on the horizon?
But perhaps there is new hope on the horizon. The government has now strongly stated that it is prepared to take legal action if energy suppliers fail to treat customers fairly.
Sadly, I think it could come to this -- and if it does, the political storm that could ensue is bound to slow progress.
While Ofgem says there is no evidence of the Big Six suppliers acting as a cartel, I believe their herd mentality prevents effective competition and severely limits consumer choice. In turn, this means the prices we pay are not as fair as they should be. Thus, in my view, a sweeping reform of the whole energy industry is needed in order to guarantee consumers a fair treatment. Who knows whether the government will be brave enough to force such fundamental change through.
Regularly reviewing how much you pay for your energy -- and switching to the supplier that offers you the best deal -- is, for now, the most effective way to ensure you aren't paying over the odds to heat and light your home this winter.
In my view, it's clear that our energy suppliers won't offer us lower prices and better service unless they're forced to. So until that day comes, the best thing we can all do is protect ourselves from over-pricing, bad billing and dodgy deals!
> Get a better deal on your gas and electricity through The Fool.
More: Save £200 And Get A £200 Rebate From Your Energy Supplier! | The Future For Energy Prices
Most Recent
Comments
-
Hi, In regard to the above article. I am wondering if the electricity companies are in fact being honest about the extra cost of installing and running pay meters. I live in Northern Ireland and get my electricity from NIE. I have spoken to NIE twice in regard to the cost of paying electricity from a pay meter, and they informed me that although companies over in England charge more for pay meters, in NI pay meters are 2.5% cheaper for customers as they are less expensive to run and dont require billing, postage, estimates. I was was very dubious about this as i dont trust these companies to tell the truth, but NIE stated that they had recieved numerous calls as a result of T.V programmes claiming pay meter customer were getting ripped off and they were intending to clarify the difference in pricing. Now if NIE say it cheaper and customers get a 2.5% discount why can English companies say its more expensive?
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
BTW Any small businesses out there, look out for the rolling contract CON. All the power companies operate this. They offer a fixed period contract, and at the end of that period, UNLESS YOU HAVE NOTIFIED THEM 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE CONTRACT ENDS, they will start you on a new contract, usually on terms much worse than the previous one. They then have you locked in for a prolonged period at a high tariff. So beware, the minute you sign a power contract, make a diary note to terminate it within the notice period.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
This prepayment meter "expense" is a myth. Now that so many of the old mechanical token meters have been replaced by electronic top up meters, there is no reason why these meters should be more expensive to run, certainly there is no reason for the enormous difference between prepay and standard tariffs. The only true cost is the 4% commission they pay to paypoint etc, and dont forget, they have use of your money almost before u have used any energy. Prepayment meters are a cash cow. When I lived in a flat with a mechanical meter, I never knew it go wrong in 3 years anyway. The best thing I ever did was buy an energy monitor for £15 that lets you read your consumption in real time. When you can see that leaving the TV or standby is costing you £X, you soon start turning things off. I also swapped out standard bulbs for energy saving ones. My electricity use is now down to about £16 a month, less than half what it was despite the increase in costs. If people were prepared to put as much effort into reducing use as they seem to put into chasing the next best deal, they could have a much greater impact on their bills.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
22 December 2008