Top

New ABI tool provides snapshot of best and worst annuity rates


Updated on 22 August 2013 | 6 Comments

The Annuity Window reveals cross section of annuity rates ABI members are offering – with differences of up to 47% between the best and worst.

A new tool dubbed the ‘Annuity Window’ has been launched by the Association of British Insurers (ABI), which aims to give those approaching retirement an insight into the annuity rates its members offer.

All 27 ABI members that provide annuities will have to reveal the rates they would quote based on 12 different scenarios every two months.

The tool forms part of the Retirement Choices Code which ABI members have had to follow since March earlier this year. Providers have to send out regular, clear and consistent information about the choices pension investors have at retirement and now the league table of annuities will also be provided.

Best and worst rates

The ABI says that the 12 scenarios it uses will change each time it updates the Annuity Window, but the figures released for July are based on a 65-year-old with an £18,000 pot to convert.

The tool allows you to alter where the person lives, their health and lifestyle as well as the type of annuity to see how the rate he or she is offered changes from provider to provider.

The biggest difference on the best and worst rates for a conventional annuity is 31%.

If the person lived in Manchester, had no health problems and wanted a single annuity the best yearly income he or she could get stands at £1,099.92 from Reliance Mutual, while the worst would have been £839.52 from Scottish Widows/Clerical Medical/Halifax.

Over a 25-year period that would amount to a loss of £6,510 if the worse rate was chosen.

The disparity is even greater between the best and worst rates for an enhanced annuity (for those who already have some health problems) where the difference is an extraordinary 47%.

If you adjust the Annuity Window to show what is available if the person smoked and had lung disease the best rate came from Prudential with an offer of £1,778.23, while the worst was from Friends Life for £1,213.59.

Over a 25-year period this amounts to a staggering £14,116 loss had the worst rate been picked.

How useful is the tool?

Over 400,000 people opt for an annuity each year, but an estimated £1 billion is wasted by people going for the wrong one.

The ABI thinks the problem is down to people not shopping around. In its Retirement Choices Code it has banned providers from including an annuity signup sheet when contacting pension savers, to prevent people taking the easy way out and converting their pot with the same firm that has invested it.

The Annuity Window is meant to show people what to expect, and it is hoped that lifting the lid on annuity rates and forcing providers to become more transparent will expose those that continually offer the worst rates into changing their ways.

But critics say that rather than making things clearer the tool could cause more confusion.

That's because the the tool doesn't have live information on rates, so the prices shown are several weeks old. Also it can't be customised to an individual and only covers 95% of the market. Plus some providers shown only offer quoted rates to existing members. Reliance Mutual for example doesn’t offer its non-smoker rates on the open market.

But the ABI says the Annuity Window  is meant to encourage retiring pension investors to shop around rather than act as a price comparison service.

Shopping around

As you approach retirement you will need to decide what you want to do with your pension savings.

Some will buy an annuity where you are able to guarantee a fixed income for the rest of your life. But there are other options like income drawdown that might be more suitable.

When shopping for an annuity it is important to remember that you don’t have to stick with provider that has invested your pension. Taking the easy option could end up costing you a fortune.

More on pensions:

Be a pension millionaire!

How to top up your State Pension

Government to cap pension charges

George Osborne brings forward State Pension and care reforms

More than 90% of employees happy to stay in a workplace pension

Most Recent


Comments



  • 23 August 2013

    Hi Meldrew, some good points. I also lived throught the inflation of the 70s and saw my Grandparents income decimated. Although my parents who had just bought a new house saw their debt inflated away. Just a couple of things. Inflation linked annuities r currently priced I believe to allow for over 5% annual inflation. That is, the starting point is lower and for you to break even with 'average everything', inflation would have to be over 5% - government now seem to make this a very rare ocurrence. So it seems they are not good value The fixed term anuities seem a better bet as they allow you to 're-annuitiese' in 10 or so years time when rates should be better. Personally, at the moment I would go for income drawdown, where you keep the cash, and I could certainy earn a lot more than an annuity. Take you point about the footsie companies changing, but the big ones have been their for 25 years - all the ones I listed. However, a unit trust is not set in stone they can also buy and sell - indeed they should be swopping out shares that have become low yielders for high yielders. I picked this unit trust because it is in big safe companiey and managed for me. It is all the pension companies do, and take a massive fee for doing so. One of my irks, as you may have gathered, is that governements don't trust us so they have made pension provision complicated and policed, so only big companies can make most money from it I should say I am an active share trader, and hardly ever invest in footsie companies anymore as Elephants dont gallop. The 250 and AIM shares give you far better returns, though not necessarily dividends. The footsie as you say has yet to hit its 1999 peak whilst the 250 hit a new peak in 2004 and has regularly done so since.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 22 August 2013

    To cover two posts in one reply - the annuity is safe - but your life expectancy isn't guaranteed. If you have a limited life expectancy when you take the annuity then you can get an enhanced pension . You can also take out term insurance to ensure that if you die early then your loved ones still get some dosh. But its because of all the variables that you can't have up to date easy to source annuity rates to cover every situation. You can get single life, joint life, level, increasing 5%, increasing RPI, limited guarantee annuities and these options can be permed together to create lots of variables. Then there's your age, health, where you live, what job you used to have and so on. So its not easy to produce meaningful live rates, just an indication. Its a bit like insurance comparison sites in that some factors can be incorporated in the comparison - but not all. When you go to the proper site more options open up for you before you make the final choice. Annuities are much the same but more important because the sums involved are larger and you make a once and for always choice - not like insuring a car where you can change your mind after a year. A share portfolio might be safe, it might not. It probably will do better than an annuity most of the time but there will be times when it will not. Check back 10, 20 years for the constituents of the FTSE100 and compare it with today - it'll look a lot different. So the blue chips then aren't the blue chips of today, and look at the banking sector! But if you are looking for an annuity do your research and take a few weeks to make the decision. Hedge your bets if you can. Almost certainly in 30 years time hindsight will tell you you got the decision wrong in some way, so you have to live with that. But most of us, having lived through the 1970's and the inflation then that decimated the incomes of those on fixed incomes then, would want to have the reassurance of an RPI linked annuity, if we could afford the low initial rate of income.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 22 August 2013

    sorry meldrew you fell for the con - Annuties Safe? - if you die in a year you have given them your money - nice gift if you can get it. Ever heard of a poor pension company? Why are most of these companies in the footsie - because they make loads of money from you. Annuities are set and to be fair the government has set some lousy rules about how they must be covered. if you are unlucky enough to retire now you will a very low annuity but 10 years ago you got twice as much, and in 10 years time I am betting you will get much more. You have been locked in to a low rate for the rest of your life. You might have £90 a month for the next 30 years, eaten away by inflation, but I will not I will get £105,£108, £111,£115 - more each year and definetly ahead of inflation by investing in the likes of BT, BP, Astrazeneca, Glax, Standard life, Aviva, etc. this mix of companies isn't safe? It is just like investing money in shares vs savings etc. I have been told I am a risk taker for investing in shares - No the people taking risks are those who put it in savings. In 10 years time my money will almost certainly buy more than it does today. Those people who relied on savings will be able to buy 20% less, thanks to inflation. The only problem with shares is the sums involved and the need to be able to commit over time - say 10 years.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.