Barclays Launches Contactless Debit Card

From March, all new Barclays debit cards are to be equipped with contactless technology. But what exactly are contactless payments, and more importantly, how safe are they?
At the risk of sounding nerdy, technology excites me. So when Britain's third-largest bank, Barclays announced it was extending contactless technology to its Visa debit cards, you'd think I'd be jumping at the chance to write about it.
Trouble is, contactless payments haven't really taken off in the UK, and for all the hype surrounding the technology, its launch - in this country at least, has turned out to be somewhat of a damp squib.
In theory, contactless payments seem like a good idea. After all, they work in exactly the same way as a regular credit or debit card, only instead of sticking your card into a chip and PIN device, you simply tap your card onto a special reader at the till for transactions up to £10.
As there's no cash involved, payments are quicker and queues are shorter, meaning impatient Londoners like me are less likely to go into cardiac arrest while standing in them.
Barclays is already a pioneer in the contactless world, launching its OnePulse card in September 2007, a 3-in-1 credit card combining contactless and Chip and PIN technology with an Oyster travelcard, which millions of Londoners already use to get around the capital.
Barclaycard now has around one million contactless cards in circulation. With the new Visa debit cards that will be issued from March, the bank predicts there will be an additional three million contactless debit card customers by the end of the year.
But despite these impressive numbers rolled out by Barclays, why has contactless failed to make a splash so far in the UK?
Needles in haystacks
The answer is simple. There's just nowhere to use them!
I don't know about you, but I've only ever seen a couple of contactless payment points while out and about - and I work right in the centre of London. After all, it's all very well to have one of these snazzy little cards, but if there's nowhere to use it, the contactless facility is rendered redundant.
There are currently 8,000 retailers which accept contactless payments, with stores including Books Etc, Thresher, Eat, Yo! Sushi, Krispy Crème and Coffee Republic all signed up.
However, it's been over a year since the launch of OnePulse, and Barclays has failed to live up to the initial target of 20,000 outlets announced last April. So, while the banks may be raving about contactless technology, it seems retailers have a lot of catching up to do.
Contactless cons
An even bigger concern raised about contactless is what happens if your card is lost, stolen or misused by a third party.
This interesting story in the Guardian highlights how contactless technology could be a potential fraudster's paradise, allowing criminals to get their mitts on your to your precious cash.
However, APACS, Visa and MasterCard have gone to great lengths to try to address any worries, insisting the technology is safe and secure.
Although APACS admits that it is theoretically possible for a fraudster to read data from a contactless card, it stresses that the limited information stored on that part of the card would not be enough to clone it.
They also add that from time to time you will automatically be prompted to enter your PIN as you would do on a regular transaction, as another measure to prevent misuse.
It's important to remember that fraud guarantees for contactless payments are exactly the same as other cards, and as long as you haven't acted fraudulently or negligently, you will be refunded for any losses incurred.
Besides, with the £10 limit imposed on contactless transactions, my guess is scamming skinny lattes and croissants aren't exactly top priority for those hardcore fraudsters.
Reassuringly, APACS says that so far there have been no reports of fraud losses attributed to contactless capability. Just remember if you are a Barclays bank customer and you get a new debit card from March this year, you'll need to check your statements regularly for any erroneous transactions. Be sure to report them - however small, they don't belong to you.
So, whether you think contactless technology is a good or bad thing, you'd better get used to seeing more of those terminals. Although not mainstream at the moment, where Barclays have led, others will surely follow.
I'm not sure if we'll ever become a cashless society, or if contactless shopping will really take-off - but one thing is for certain. With all Barclays debit cardholders able to make contactless transactions from March, contactless technology is slowly, but very surely here to stay.
More: Three Ways To Make Some Cash / Get Free Travel Insurance and £100!
Most Recent
Comments
-
Is it just me or are the public not annoyed by this introduction? Barclays are not just 'offering' this to people on their personal bank accounts they are issuing all new debit cards with the 'contactless' facility - making it very difficult to obtain a card that does not have this facility. What about security? What is to stop someone stealing or cloning your card and spending hundreds of pounds, in multiples of £15 before you notice that is occurring? After all the fuss they make about protecting your pin number etc isn't this totally irresponsible? And if someone does spend or withdraw money on your card how are you to prove it wasn't you???? Seems very bad news at best.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I've just received an 'enhanced' card from barclays. I'm working on a strategy with a laser pointer and a scalpel to turn it back into a normal debit card. I'll let you know how I get on :)
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I do agree with all of the above comments on security but that is not the main point of this comment. I am a retired IT professional who is increasingly concerned about the misuse of technology by the state and others. This card which you will carry with an RFID chip, which identifies you, is not only able to be read by a point of sale terminal in a retailers. Neither is it neccessary, with the right equipment for there to be physical contact with the card. SO any interested party who invests in the right kit can track your movements. Paranoid? I think not. Who would have predicted 25yrs ago that our government would want us all fingerprinted (for ID cards)and would want to build a DNA database of the whole population? (Hopefully this latter has been given a temporary setback). Of course, all of this will be presented as being for our convenience and "security". Big brother did not make it for 1984 but, probably spurred-on by the 2012 olympics, he looks like being successful, if 30 yrs late, by 2014
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
27 April 2011