Is Unemployment Insurance Up To Scratch?

Figures out today show a doubling in the number of unemployment-insurance claims. But is this cover any good?
According to trade body the Association of British Insurers (ABI), the number of new claims made against unemployment insurance policies exploded late last year. In fact, unemployment claims on payment protection insurance (PPI) more than doubled between November 2007 and November 2008, as shown below:
PPI unemployment claims
Month | 2007 | 2008 | Increase | Increase (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
September | 8,179 | 13,854 | 5,675 | 69 |
October | 8,476 | 18,068 | 9,592 | 113 |
November | 8,772 | 19,105 | 10,333 | 118 |
Total | 25,427 | 51,027 | 25,600 | 101 |
Source: ABI. These data are based on responses from 79% of the market, with the figures inflated to represent the whole market.
As you can see, the number of unemployment claims for September to November 2008 (51,027) was more than double that for the same period in 2007 (25,427). What's more, the rate of increase is accelerating: the year-on-year rise in September 2008 was 69%, but November's yearly hike was a whopping 118%.
Of course, you'd expect the number of unemployment-insurance claims to be sky-rocketing, because unemployment is increasingly steeply across the UK. Indeed, thanks to the UK entering a recession last year, unemployment rose by 349,500 in 2008. Sadly, economists are predicting that unemployment will rise by between 600,000 and 1.2 million in 2009, which is a shocking outlook.
In many ways, recent events take me back to the early Nineties, when I worked for one of the UK's leading providers of payment protection insurance. Imagine a row of claim files three feet high stretching for over forty feet across an office and you can see why we had plenty of opportunities for overtime and weekend work!
How well does unemployment insurance work?
Of course, insurance companies do not accept every unemployment claim they receive. Indeed, during the last recession, insurers actively sought to reject claims in order to keep their profits high. So, look out for these loopholes, get-out clauses and hurdles to clear:
1. All unemployment insurance policies require you to be registered with the Jobcentre and `actively seeking re-employment'. In other words, you must provide proof that you are not working and are looking to return to work, including job-application and rejection letters, interview dates, etc.
2. All policies include what's known as an `initial unemployment exclusion clause'. This prevents claims from being made in close proximity to the start of a policy. Usually, this exclusion lasts for 60 to 120 days from buying a policy. So, make an unemployment claim in the early days of a policy and it's sure to be rejected immediately.
3. In addition, most policies also include a `reasonably aware' exclusion to prevent workers from taking out a policy in anticipation of making a claim. For example, if you buy a policy only after learning that your employer intends to make redundancies in your area, then your claim is likely to fail. As insurers will tell you, they are in the business of covering unexpected -- rather than likely -- events!
4. Another stumbling block is that many policies cover only redundancy, rather than unemployment. So, if you resign, are dismissed or leave a job for any reason other than compulsory redundancy, then your claim may fail. Indeed, the stricter policies also reject claims for voluntary redundancy.
5. Making a successful unemployment claim is particularly tough for self-employed people and those running their own company. Indeed, in some circumstances, you will be required to wind up your business due to insolvency before your claim will be considered.
6. If you're not in permanent employment, then your insurer will study your employment contract and history in order to establish whether unemployment is a `regular and recurrent' feature of your occupation. If you are a seasonal worker (for instance, you work in a seaside hotel), then unemployment will be a routine part of your working life, so your claim will not be paid.
7. Likewise, if you work on a short-term, specific or fixed-term contract (such as a specific building or construction project), then you may have difficulty arguing that your employment came to a sudden end, rather than expiring as planned.
8. Most policies also include a `waiting' or `excess' period, which varies from 14 to 90 days. During this excess period, you will not qualify for any payout at all. So, if you're off work for 80 days, but your policy has a 60-day excess period, then you will receive only 20 days' benefit. Most mortgage PPI policies have a 30- or 60-day excess period, so they don't pay out for the first month or two.
9. If your claim is accepted, then your monthly benefit will be paid until you return to work. However, in order for your claim to continue to be paid each month, you must submit a `continuation claim form' plus proof of ongoing unemployment.
10. Finally, all policies have a cap on how long you can claim, usually twelve months in a row. So, after a year, your claim will be closed, regardless of whether you've found work or not.
In summary, although unemployment insurance can provide a valuable safety-net to those out of work, this net does have some rather large holes in it. Then again, thanks to means-testing, National Insurance requirements and other restrictions, the same applies to Jobseekers Allowance and other state benefits. So, when it comes to being out of work, the only things you can really rely on are your strength of mind and your savings!
STOP PRESS: After I finished writing this article, the Competition Commission announced that it is to ban the sale of payment protection insurance (PPI) by lenders at the point of sale. In future, lenders will no longer be able to offer PPI when arranging credit cards, personal loans and mortgages -- and for seven days afterwards. Also, there will be a complete ban on single-premium policies bundled into personal loans.
This is terrific news for borrowers, millions of whom pay extortionate premiums for this rip-off accident, sickness and unemployment cover. This represents a major victory for the Fool (and other consumer champions), as we campaigned tirelessly against this swindle for six long years. Here's to lower prices and better choice in the PPI market!
More: Get quality quotes for insurance| A Victory In The War Against Rip-offs | Mortgage Possessions Double
Most Recent
Comments
-
Great article and, Lokifan: Quite useful comments. I do hope your husband's job situation has changed. Who was your insurer if I may ask?
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Re Unemployment insurance, we took out a policy to help with mortgage payments should the hubby be unemployed (my job is fairly secure working in NHS, plus I would get good sickness cover). Well the unfortunate did happen not once but twice inside of a year when he was made redundent on 2 occasions, the first occasion he got a substantial payout for length of service and although we intially claimed on the insurance we did not actually proceed with the claim as he secured another job after being off for 3 months. Then out of the blue on our return from a holiday he was again made redundant this time without any payment so it was straight onto unemployment benefit which was about ?£120 per fortnight, we could get no other help eg council tax relief as I was working so money was tight especially with a hefty mortgage so we initiated a claim with the insurance and received our first payment in arrears two month later and monthly afterwards, although it did not cover our entire mortgage as we had not increased cover when we remortgaged with a new provider which was something we should have considered. The other problem I thought of re taking a new policy out was the exclusion period so we would have been safer to take out a completely new additional policy to make up difference or to cover full amount and keep the other running until the new one was past exclusion period (would have meant paying two policies for several months but I would have still had cover with old policy) As pointed out previously others evidence of unemployment and job searches had to be submitted, he registered online with several agencies and updated his CV regular so it kept his CV at the "top of the pile" so to speak, he got regular calls from agencies re the type of work he wanted but most was of a contract nature which he did ot want but after months of seaching he discussed his position with the insurance company should he take temporary/contract work and they were very helpful offering to suspend the claim for up to 6 months in the event of his getting work which meant if it ended he would simply go back on the same claim until the end of the 12 months which was reassuring, if the job ended after 6 months he would start a new claim from scratch depending on circumstances. Luckily he got a job initially until new years eve but his contract has been extended twice so far by a month at a time and in these unceratin times we are just taking things one week at a time and saving where we can in case he is unemployed again. For us the unemployment cover was a blessing and gave us a safety net when we most needed it. However what happens in the future we don't know.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
squiffycat I'm quite concerned by your comments. I have taken out this unemployment insurance, so if the tap on the shoulder came I could a) survive without too much damage to my savings b) bide my time waiting for something appropriate to my skillset, rather than take a McJob on minimum wage. I didn't realise that the jobcentre would make you take a minimum wage job after only 30 days. I thought they'd give you at least 6 months to find something appropriate. If this is correct, you are right the insurance is worthless....
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
10 May 2011