Top

BFW: one of the biggest wine investment scammers to be liquidated

One of the nation's biggest wine investment scammers is being shut down. It won't be the last.

£100 million a year. That's a conservative estimate of how much money duped investors pour into the pockets of scam wine investment firms, of which there are at least a dozen active at any one time.

Next month, one of the biggest, Bordeaux Fine Wines Ltd (“BFW”), will end up in compulsory liquidation in the wake of a provisional liquidation by the High Court in the public interest, following an investigation by the Insolvency Service. This was a response to a petition on behalf of the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.

Young 'experts'

BFW cold-called potential victims with the usual boiler room style tactics. The highly motivated salesforce painted the firm as wine experts. Yet when BFW was set up in September 2008, its director – Kenneth Gundlach – was just 24, hardly old enough to have acquired the in-depth knowledge of the wine market the firm claimed.

Yet while his wine expertise is unclear, he was certainly on top of his real task – encouraging investors to trust him with substantial sums. Many started with £5,000 to £10,000, told that they would make annual gains of around a fifth from “carefully selected portfolios”. They were often encouraged to add more some months later when they were told that their investments had “already performed better than expected”.

The firm officially operated from a top notch address in central London. But while this impressed victims, it was just a maildrop which might have cost the company as little as £40 a month.

The real operation was in a low rent office in Croydon where an army of young people called investors, often using multi-dialling phones to call several intended victims at one – there is no point wasting time waiting for someone to pick up so let the others have a silent call.

Too big to hide

BFW grew so big that it could no longer hide behind the financial anonymity handed out to smaller firms. In its two most successful financial periods – 2011 and 2012 – it pulled in around £20 million a year. Besides telling investors that they would make big returns, it impressed them by claiming the wine would be held by London City Bond, a long-established warehouse. The only problem was that London City Bond has never heard of BFW or seen any of the wines it said it bought for its clients.

The prices quoted for the wines was generally around 80%-100% more than the same wine from a legitimate dealer. So the price would have to double before anyone could make a profit. This assumes the cases of claret ever existed or were genuinely as described – not the case with several wine investment firms.

Enormous profits

BFW profits were enormous. Sole shareholder Gundlach picked up £4.7 million as a dividend in 2011 and £4.2 million the following year - more than a fifth of the income. Gundlach is also a director at Hunter & Reynolds, where there is a “proposal to strike off” and Driving Made Simple. Both these companies have been set up in the past twelve months.

And the staff were well paid when they made a sale. They would even boast about it when buying sandwiches in Croydon. As the local café owner said:

“They all have fake names, they are running an illegal ponzi scheme (paying investors' returns from other investors investing). They promise investors they can exit them but they can't as it's totally illiquid. Its so toe-curling what they do, they dress like Gordon Gecko but instead walk into a shabby block in Croydon. How they sleep at night god knows, most of their clients are 55-60 plus. All I can say is what goes around, comes around! Problem is they mentally train themselves to believe its a good investment even though they are robbing elderly people's ISAs and savings.”

The firm disintegrated a year ago when one salesperson said: “I just left Bordeaux Fine Wines because none of us were paying tax on our earnings and our company bank account just got frozen because most of our clients don't own their wine.” Sellers picked up between 10% and 20% of cash they ripped from victims.

But just before the end, top BFW people were commenting, using false names, on various sites that it was a great investment. One wrote: “They are a legitimate brokerage, registered with companies house since 2008. A colleague of mine invested with them last year - storage with your own account with the London City Bond all checked out. The returns have been excellent also I must say.”

This is not the first wine investment scam to be shut down in the public interest. And it won't be the last. It's a low-cost operation which can bring in big money. Unless you are a top wine expert yourself, head down to your local supermarket for a bottle of plonk and drink it instead!

More on scams:

Don't fall for the visa scam!

Graphene: the 'miracle material' investment that will lose you money

The worst scams of 2013

Don't fall for the Suffolk scammers!

Don't fall for this supermarket voucher scam

Why this property 'investment' was wound up by the High Court

The only thing 'guaranteed' with this scam is that you'll lose your money!


Comments



  • 20 January 2014

    I really feel for those who have lost to scams like this; I have myself in the past. But, don't let one bad experience colour the whole market for you. There are many good, honest and worthwhile wine investment schemes out there; look to the registered names though. I would say the likes of BBR Wine Investment - from Berry Bros and Rudd is a good start. Also, I know that this sounds like preaching but good advice can't be given too often, if the investment promises a 'guaranteed' return, forget it. There is no such thing as a guaranteed return and all investments can lose as well as win. The old adage, 'If it looks too good to be true, then it probably is', is well worth considering before you part with any money.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 19 January 2014

    I was subjected to several extremely aggressive cold calls from this particular company and, indeed, I mentioned them on this site. They only stopped when I threatened them with the Office of Fair Trading; wish I'd actually carried out my threat now. I can understand how people were taken in but what rang alarm bells for me was the very first call when I was assured that it was a no-risk investment with a guaranteed 8% - 12% return - in all our dreams!

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 18 January 2014

    I got taken in by a wine scam back in the '80s. I was dealing with a reputable company called Marshall Wineries but then moved to live abroad. What I didn't know subsequently was the original owner was retiring, and fraudsters had infiltrated the company. This gave them access to a list of established (and trusting ) clients. I bought whisky, wine, and port. All the marketing was very good so I might have bought more, but I thought not to put all my eggs in one basket. My total 'investment' was just a shade over £12000 when I drew a line. I got lots of calls, but they were very expensive to Saudi Arabia, so eventually they left me alone. A few years went by, and then I got call from Scotland Yard wanting my opinion on one of their sales people. They suggested I might check whether what I had bought actually existed. Indeed..only my first purchases...the whisky...actually existed. Initially the fraudsters were buying reasonable stuff which did actually exist, but what caught them out was when they got greedy and were pushing cheap plonk and finally taking taking money and not registering anything for their clients (victims). Scotland Yard then put me in contact with an excellent solicitor in the Kendal area who'd been scammed himself and was on a personal mission to help everyone affected. I put in a claim as instructed. The bottom line. Everything bought on a credit card was re-imbursed by my card company. Everything bought by cheque was lost. The port didn't exist, the wine was poor quality. The whisky is still in storage and is actually very good quality. One day I'll drink it or sell it, but I'll never invest in wines or spirits again. Like millions of others since the dawn of transactions, I've learned 'Caveat emptor' the hard way. A tough life lesson which with hindsight has not been wasted. In the modern world, far too many things taken on trust are not reliable or trustworthy. Possession is still 9/10 of the law. Look at the machinations of the Cyprus Banks where your deposits are not regarded as belonging to you. Ring- fenced secure investments by mid west farmers in the MF Global scandal turn out to be anything but. That pillar of the New York stock exchange Bernie Madoff. Even the German government is having difficulty re-patriating their physical gold holdings from Fort Knox causing observers to question whether the American Government actually possesses the gold anymore. Both Fort Knox and the Federal Reserve have never been audited independently. Invest wisely in real assets locally or prepare to be fleeced.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.