Is private medical insurance worth it?

Despite the economic slump, the number of people with private medical insurance is on the rise, but does this cover offer good value?
According to figures released today by trade body the Association of British Insurers (ABI), the number of people covered by private medical insurance (PMI) is rising. Here are the latest figures from the ABI regarding PMI:
Year |
No. of people covered (000s) |
1996 |
6,099 |
1997 |
6,123 |
1998 |
6,141 |
1999 |
6,129 |
2000 |
6,466 |
2001 |
6,589 |
2002 |
6,191 |
2003 |
6,033 |
2004 |
5,820 |
2005 |
5,820 |
2006 |
5,879 |
2007 |
6,004 |
2008 |
6,224 |
Source: ABI
Private medical insurance is gaining favour
As you can see, the number of people covered by PMI peaked in 2001 at 6.589 million. Membership then fell until 2005, but has risen for three years in a row to today's 6.224 million. Indeed, despite the credit crunch and economic recession, the number of people with private medical insurance actually rose by 3.7% last year.
Having spent the first four years of my career at the UK's biggest private medical insurer (BUPA), I've always taken the view that PMI is 'nice to have' rather than 'must have' protection. Indeed, in many ways, it's a policy for WOOPies (well-off older people) and those with generous employer benefits.
In fact, most of the people covered by PMI are covered by corporate - rather than individual - policies. In 2008, almost three-quarters (73%) of those with PMI were covered by a work-based policy (4.571 million people), versus 1.653 million with self-bought policies.
Do PMI policies offer good value for money?
One way to measure whether an insurance policy offers decent value for money is to check how much of the money taken in (premiums) is paid out (in claims). In this respect, PMI offers a pretty good return, as you can see from the table below:
Year |
Premiums (£m) |
Claims (£m) |
Payout ratio (%) |
1996 |
1,412 |
1,752 |
81 |
1997 |
1,503 |
1,877 |
80 |
1998 |
1,632 |
1,970 |
83 |
1999 |
1,708 |
2,066 |
83 |
2000 |
1,788 |
2,239 |
80 |
2001 |
1,946 |
2,509 |
78 |
2002 |
2,136 |
2,710 |
79 |
2003 |
2,203 |
2,815 |
78 |
2004 |
2,188 |
2,855 |
77 |
2005 |
2,255 |
2,942 |
77 |
2006 |
2,376 |
3,071 |
77 |
2007 |
2,501 |
3,241 |
77 |
2008 |
2,653 |
3,468 |
76 |
Source: ABI
As you can see, in 2008, 76p out of every £1 collected in premiums was returned to PMI policyholders in payouts. This payout ratio - roughly three pounds in every four - is broadly in line with other mass-market insurance policies, such as car, home and life insurance. However, it is much more attractive than the payout ratios for rip-off cover such as payment protection insurance and extended warranties, where payouts are often less than 20% of premiums!
Then again, PMI premiums do tend to rise steeply over the years, thanks to inflation (rising prices) and age-related premium rises. One disappointing trend is that the payout ratio has fallen from 83% in 1998 to 76% in 2008. This suggests the attractiveness of PMI has fallen, despite the arrival of new entrants leading to fiercer market competition.
To buy or not to buy PMI?
As with all insurance, private medical insurance provides a largely hazy benefit: peace of mind. It acts as an additional safety-net to that provided to all UK residents by the National Health Service (NHS). What's more, PMI provides limited or no cover for emergency treatment or chronic conditions, Thus, it really provides protection against the cost of private treatment for acute or short-lived medical problems.
If your employer provides PMI at nil or low cost, then it's well worth having this additional protection. Indeed, after a good workplace pension, PMI is the second-most desirable employee benefit, according to research from market leader BUPA. However, buying an individual policy can be complex and costly, so I'd give it a miss if I were you.
While PMI can give you faster access to specialists, plus cleaner hospitals, a private room and better meals, it's not a universal panacea. Also, while it may help you to jump the waiting list for treatment (up to eighteen weeks) and get you back to work fitter and faster, it is by no means a miracle cure.
To be honest, the recent rise in the number of PMI policyholders surprises me, given the severity of the current recession. In the final analysis, PMI is a luxury item and, therefore, one which can be set aside if your budget is under severe strain. However, before cancelling any insurance policy, do look for easier savings elsewhere.
More: Get quality quotes for car, home and life insurance | Why stay-at-home mums (and dads) need life insurance | Dental costs will set your teeth on edge
Most Recent
Comments
-
Yes, attend a private hospital anytime. Ask for costs from reception. Cliff´s article is good, and fair. It has long been estimated that about five years membership subscription (family, 40 - 50 years) for most schemes, would cover most treatments available at a private hospital, with a few exceptions. For many problems, you can walk into a NHS A& E Dept, where you may have to wait a while, but will be seen if you have an acute problem. Extract condensed from the small print rules of a leading health care insurer. -Members may only claim benefit for the treatment of acute conditions. Chronic conditions are defined as follows. A chronic condition is a disease, illness or injury with at least one of the following characteristics: a. Has no known cure or recurs. b. Leads to permanent disability. c.Is caused by changes in the body which cannot be reversed. d.Requires the patient to be specially trained or rehabilitated. e. Requires prolonged supervision, monitoring or treatment. Members should call in advance of treatment to confirm whether covered by their policy. Usually, you are then sent a claim form which you attend (and pay!!) your GP for signature, return it to PMI for approval. Could take ??? days. If you are a risk for injuries, such as sportsman, self employed manual worker, keen DIY enthusiast, gardener, etc.., for a serious injury you will be taken to A & E. Best cover would be the EXETER or similar schemes, (and there are several) which cover you for attending many private outpatients clinics, (physiotherapists, etc) for individual treatment which will hasten your return to work Most MCSP Physio`s have immediate contact with consultants, and can point you in the right direction. Hope this is of help! - CONSULTANT. As an afterthought - Most privtae hospitals can arrange "terms" if you prefer, which means you pay for treatment YOU HAVE HAD, rather than PMI which means you pay BEFORE for something hopefully you may never need.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Interesting article. I get BUPA membership from my employer but have been wondering about it's value/worth over the past couple of years. I've used it twice in 10 years for 2 minor things which allowed me to see a specialist straightaway rather than having to wait for an NHS appointment. I've wondered about asking my employer for an increase in Salary equivalent to the cost to them, save the money, and then if I need private treatment in the future I assume that I can just pay at the time, i.e. a form a self insurance. I've no idea of the cost and/or availability of private health care if I just walk in off the street (with my wallet of course!). Has anyone else any experience of this or taken the approach of self insurance I've outlined above?
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
As with all insurance it seems a waste until you have to use it. I was considering cancelling my BUPA membership when my wife developed a problem with her hand and went to her GP who didn't have a clue what was wrong. On the 2nd visit she mentioned she had BUPA and the GPs face lit up as she was passing on the problem to someone else. Within a week the problem was diagnosed and treated and she has to return on a quarterly/six monthly basis for check ups. Everything has and will be covered by BUPA. On a return visit to her GP she was told she would have had to wait up to a year to see an NHS consultant - by which time the problem would have been a REAL problem. I agree that it is an expense that some people cannot meet but with the state of the current NHS I think it is something that everyone should consider either taking out or definitley keeping. I for one am glad I can afford to pay this - there is not point in having extra cash if you're not healthy enough to enjoy it!
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
01 May 2009