Top

A false dawn for house prices

Two leading mortgage lenders have reported a May rebound in house prices. However, the downward slide is far from over...

Halifax has revealed that the average UK house price leapt by an impressive 2.6% from April to May. This follows Nationwide Building Society reporting a rise of 1.2% in May last Friday.

So, all is rosy and we look forward to the housing market turning the corner any day now, right? Wrong!

Green shoots or a dead-cat bounce?

In reality, house prices are still falling in yearly terms. All that's happened is that they aren't falling as fast as they were earlier this year. Indeed, from May 2008 to May 2009, the average price fell by almost a seventh (13.7%), according to Halifax.

So, while the slope isn't as steep, it still points downward.

Nevertheless, according to the most hopeful 'experts', the slump is all but over and we are bumping along the bottom. To me, this view simply doesn't ring true. It's far, far too early to call the bottom of the housing crash just yet.

At best, house prices will stabilise for a while, before resuming their downward slide.

In the previous housing boom, prices peaked across most of the UK in the summer of 1989 and then began their long slide. Indeed, house prices didn't return to their previous high for nearly nine years - and that's before taking inflation into account.

The first of many false dawns

When talking up the housing market, the bulls pin their hopes on two things: affordability and interest rates. As house prices come down from their peak, affordability improves.

Furthermore, the dramatic cut in the Bank of England base rate from 5% in October 2008 to a lifetime low of 0.5% today has caused a drop in mortgage rates.

However, while property pundits claim homes are looking increasingly affordable, this doesn't add up when you compare property prices to household incomes. In fact, housing still looks expensive on a historical basis.

The ratio of house prices to average earnings is still above its late-Eighties peak - and it is more than twice the low reached in the depths of the mid-Nineties.

Interest rates are low, which makes mortgage repayments more affordable. Alas, the next rise in interest rates - whether by the Bank of England or market forces - is likely to choke any budding recovery.

In addition, you still have to find some way to pay off the capital borrowed to buy a home, which can amount to £200,000 or more.

Housing optimists point to the return of gazumping and sealed bids in the London market as signs of 'green shoots' returning to the property market. However, I'm not convinced that a few super-rich cash buyers in Mayfair will translate into a UK-wide recovery.

Rising repossessions, bad debts and defaults force banks to be ultra-conservative in their lending. Thus, anyone with a less-than-perfect credit history will face an uphill battle when seeking a low-rate mortgage.

The grim reality

Just as one swallow doesn't make a summer, one spring bounce doesn't mean an end to the biggest property bubble in British history. In my view, this spring fever won't last.

The harsh reality is that the number of property transactions, mortgage approvals and home loans remain below half of what is needed for stable and rising house prices.

Furthermore, salary freezes and wage cuts are commonplace, and job cuts will add another million people to the unemployment figures over the next twelve to eighteen months.

Thus, while the economy remains weak, it is highly unlikely that we can sustain higher house prices by growing our wages.

Also, the credit crunch is still here and mortgage rationing continues, with roughly two in three mortgages requiring a deposit of a quarter of the purchase price.

Indeed, a quarter of all home loans require a deposit of at least 40%, which is beyond the means of all but a few hopeful first-time buyers.

Thanks to the collapse of the securitisation market, roughly £100 billion a year has been sucked out of the mortgage market -- a sum which the banks are struggling to replace (partly with taxpayers' money).

So, my advice would be to ignore the nonsense spouted by estate agents, surveyors, mortgage brokers and property hacks. Not one of these vested interests predicted the crash - and none will predict its end, either!

Finally, this latest news reminds me of the 'phoney war' between 1990 and 1994, when housing commentators seized on any slight rise in house prices to argue that the crash was over.

So, don't make the mistake of extrapolating any short-term trend in house prices into a genuine recovery. It's far too early for that.

Having narrowly avoided financial meltdown, we've a long way to go before we're out of the woods...

More: Get filthy rich from property! | Get a fixed rate mortgage at 2.49%!

Most Recent


Comments



  • 08 June 2009

    Hudges Actually, the multiples of average earnings have no effect on their own - they are merely a poor proxy for the actual factor that matters - affordability. Very few people think of buying a house in terms of a multiple of their wages, instead they concentrate on the percentage of takehome pay the mortgage will cost, the deposit they will require, what they are willing to sacrifice to buy said house, and the cost of the alternative - renting or living in a smaller / worse house. Average earnings multiples only reflect one and a half of those variables, at best. Also, the mean on that graph is irrelevant - the trend is far more important. I don't remember where it was done, but another site had taken the source data from that graph and done a trend analysis on it. The result, which can almost be seen on the graph, was a definite uptrend from around 3.2 in the 50s and 60s to around 3.8 now. Which would suggest that any short term falls are merely part of an overall uptrend in the market. And the other factors you list as affecting the UK will affect all other nations as well, some of them by much more. Ireland and Iceland's governments are now pretty much bankrupt; China, Brazil and Russia already have inflation around 10% or higher, and India is likely to join them once the crisis eases; and Russia, the largest gas and oil producer in the world, could run out of electricity capacity by 2011. And these are all nations that already contribute significantly to UK immigration. The better managed ones such as France tend to be places UK citizens want to emigrate to, which will make it harder for them to do so, further increasing overpopulation in the UK. "My view is that the country needs policies that stimulate the economy to encourage exports and wealth creation." Didn't Japan try that in the 1980s? And Germany in the 1990s? Didn't work out too well for them in the end - Germany's economy is shrinking twice as fast as the UK's, and Japan's hasn't grown properly for 18 years. As for your final question, there is no such thing as a good housing market, because there is no such thing as a housing market. Each street / block of flats / house can only be judged individually, as it is a unique good with a unique set of circumstances. The housing market is just a euphemism people use to try and understand why prices behave as they do, and turn something complicated into something simple. But I guess to the extent that there is a market for housing, it is a good market when enough homes are being built to supply the number of people who want them. If that was happening, then prices would rise with inflation and houses would be traded much more freely as there would be no market imbalances. Indeed, in an efficient market high prices always resolve themselves, as they encourage more people to produce goods as the price exceeds the cost of production. Sadly, that doesn't happen in the UK because planning laws stop the market from functioning efficiently.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 08 June 2009

    The trends suggest that multiples of Average Earnings do have a major impact, but as people have mentioned, there are other factors. http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/graphs-average-house-price-to-earnings-ratio.php This shows a mean of 3.4% since the 1950s. More recently the equivalent figure for first time buyers rations has been 3.3% since 1983. These would suggest that there are still further falls in the pipeline. Other factors that could have medium to longer term impact are the general economic stability of the UK as a whole. The present Government has put the country into so much debt that tax levels will have to rise significantly. Inflation will undoubtdly rise when the impact of the financial easing measures come into effect and with it interest rates. Further oil price shocks are also likely to affect things. The electricity supply generating capacity in the country is not being replaced sufficiently quickly and it is suggested that there will be power cuts by 2016. These are all factors that may lead to less influx of people to the UK, less housing demand, and thus lower prices. My view is that the country needs policies that stimulate the economy to encourage exports and wealth creation. Rising property prices do not create wealth for the country, just increases the divide of wealth between the population of the country. Increasing that divide can only lead to instability and potential problems. Finally, can someone answer a question? What is a good housing market? Is it one where plenty of homes are being sold or is it where prices are rising? 

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 08 June 2009

    Johnny5 Actually, those figures do look about right to me, if you consider the whole population. My parents earn three times as much as me, but their mortgage is two thirds of the amount of mine - that's why the UK as a whole spends such a low amount of GDP on housing. First time buyers or people moving up the chain in the UK will pay more than their equivalent renters in Germany, but once you're settled down and get the mortgage mostly paid off, you'll be paying much less. From memory, and another of Cliff's articles, I think the total value of housing in the UK is around £5 trillion, with only £1 trillion of that secured with mortgages. As such, even if the mortgage rate is 6%, the UK will only have total mortgage costs of around £ 60 billion. In contrast, if the total value of Germany's housing is around the same (cheaper houses but more of them), and around 60% (£3 trillion) of them are rented, even at a rental rate of 4%, that's a total cost of £120 billion. And that's 60% of the German market versus around 70% of the UK market as homeowners. I appreciate that those are back of the envelope calculations, and Germany has a larger GDP, but I think that's the root cause of the difference. As for nickpike's claim about 20 years plus - I just ignored that one to be honest! He's effectively proposing 0.75% inflation over the next twenty years. Even if that does happen for the UK, the much higher levels of inflation in the BRIC countries will make it much easier for people there to buy into the UK market, much like they have done throughout the whole of the last boom. And how likely is it to happen in the UK, given that the last inflation report from the BofE indicated that current market expectations of interest rates are too low until mid 2012?!

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.