Top

Stupid things Brown has done with our money

As of last week, we all support Newcastle United - financially, at least. John Fitzsimons rounds up three other stupid ways the Government has wasted taxpayers' money.

I've always had a soft spot for Newcastle United. The people are great, they've always played decent football, generally they are a very likeable club.

However, I've never wanted to be involved financially with them. But now I am. And so you. No really, you are!

Last week, Newcastle United confirmed it had signed a contract extension with its current shirt sponsors - a certain state-owned bank called Northern Rock.

And it's not like the money involved is small fry - the contract comes into force from next season, when in all likelihood Newcastle will be back in the Premier League. So long as they stay there for the next four seasons, it will end up costing me and you £10m!

This bank is supposed to be paying us back the millions and millions of pounds that has been pumped in to keep it afloat. I appreciate that advertising helps, but does advertising on a football shirt really constitute good value? I highly doubt it - I've never been more likely to use a certain company just because they sponsor a football team. My own side, West Ham, are sponsored by an online gambling company - I have plenty of online gambling accounts, but I've no urge to open another one at SBOBET.

Sadly this frankly appalling waste of the money we shell out each month is just the tip of the iceberg. Here's three more examples of where your money has been blown lately.

1) The VAT cut

At the tail-end of 2008, the Chancellor Alistair Darling ordered for VAT to be cut by 2.5%, by 17.5% to 15%. The idea was that because products were cheaper, we'd all be falling over ourselves to buy them, thereby boosting the economy, and everything would be sunshine and light.

While the cut was only temporary (coming to an end on 1 January), it was hardly cheap, costing up to £12bn according to some experts.

In fairness to the Government, most economists agree that the cut helped in terms of retail figures and restricting rising unemployment, though there are wildly differing views on just how helpful it was, and whether it provided value for money.

The problem though is the temporary nature of the cut. Many economists, including the Centre for Economics and Business Research, have suggested that while the cut had only a small impact, seeing prices go up again may actually stall the recovery the economy is currently staging. So not only did the cut provide poor value for money, its reversal may now cause things to get even worse.

Brilliant.

2) Work for RBS? Have a bonus!

Royal Bank of Scotland, a bank so crippled it has relied on all of us to take a whopping 84% stake in it, is still paying bonuses to its staff. It's far from alone of course, but as the Treasury is in charge of the bonus payouts, you'd at least hope they are miniscule. Instead, reports suggest £1.5bn will be winging its way out in bonuses.

The bank's chief executive, Stephen Hester (who is on a £9.7m package by the way) says there is nothing he can do about the need to pay bonuses, blaming the good old marketplace.

Of course there's nothing wrong with rewarding good performance with a bonus, but when RBS is expected to report losses of billions I can't help but feel perhaps that money earmarked for bonuses might be better spent elsewhere.

3) The car scrappage scheme

This idea sounds like a great deal for us all, but I think it's a waste of money.

So long as your car is old enough, has a valid MOT and you've owned it for at least 12 months, you will qualify for £2,000 off the price of a new car if you trade your old car in.

But it's not all it's cracked up to be - we've written before about why the scheme means you'll actually end up shelling out more than you save, in our piece Car-scrappage scheme will cost you money!

Of course, the Government didn't launch the scheme to help us save money on a new car - it was trying to help the ailing motoring industry. The trouble is, the scheme didn't deliver in that respect either - according to the Society of Motoring Manufacturers, car production fell by 31% in 2009, even with the scrappage scheme (and lower VAT) in place.

Whoops.

Well, those are my three most hated cases of awful wasted money by the Government, but I'm sure you all have your own. Why not share them with your fellow lovemoney.com readers via the comment box below?

Most Recent


Comments



  • 02 February 2010

    Why have my posts been removed?

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 30 January 2010

    We all have our own pet hates. Mine is, what the heck has the present government done for ME? Can I come back next week on that? I'm retired. I pay tax on my pensions that I saved for, Oh why did I save? The bloke next door don't work and has more income than me. The last time Labour were in power, words I heard were, 'The working man's life will improve'. That's a laugh, my tax bill increased then just like it has this time. The Labour party drone on about how working class they are, now that is a joke. If they were working class, they would do the job for less pay AND not claim all the expenses they do. They take the mick the same as some others, yet they have the cheek to say they are better. Can someone tell me; How many true working class labour MPs there are? You know those that actually HAD to work for a living, along with their parents. Not many I bet. I worked for 51 years. Saved for my pensions. paid my taxes & NI. So the big and only question I have is; What has the labour party done for ME? Answer; NOTHING.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 28 January 2010

    [b][url=/profile/oldhenry.aspx]oldhenry[/url][/b] said [b]"So the pension scheme is what attract staff into the job. Without that , I reckon the salaries would have to rise"[/b] [b][/b] After the next general election, that will probably be the case - it definitely won't be job security that's for sure (and that's even if Labour get in!). At the moment public sector pensions are unfunded, that is to say there is currently no money is being put aside to fund them for when when they retire. It's going to come directly from future taxation. Given how generous such schemes are I can see some real problems lying ahead. [b]"But the main gripe against Labour is that they consistently spend our money without any really caring whether we can afford it or not."[/b] [b][/b] I've looked at Labour's record going back until WW2. Three things seem to re-occour every time they're in power: Corruption, attacks against civil liberties (incl. dubious social engineering) and a major tax and spend attitude, even if you can't afford it.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.