Fifty years of rising house prices

What does the future hold for house prices? Cliff D'Arcy takes a look at the lessons we can learn from the past 50 years of rising house prices.
We reveal how house prices and British society have changed over 50 years.
Halifax, the UK's largest mortgage lender, has just released new housing research covering the past 50 years. This report makes for fascinating reading, as it reveals a huge amount of information about social trends in Britain over the past half-century.
Fifty years of rising house prices
According to the Halifax, the average UK house cost £2,507 in 1959. Fifty years later, a typical home would set you back £162,085. In other words, the typical house today costs almost 65 times as much as it did 50 years ago. Put another way, over 50 years, the typical house has grown in value by 8.7% a year.
However, both wages and the cost of living have increased dramatically over the same period. After stripping out retail price inflation (RPI; the rising cost of living), the Halifax reckons that house prices have risen in 'real' terms by 273% since 1959. This equates to a more modest growth rate of 2.7% a year.
Over the same period, wages have risen by 2% above retail price inflation, so houses today are far more expensive relative to wages than they were 50 years ago. Here's how real house prices have changed, decade by decade:
From the Fifties to the Noughties
UK real house prices, 1959-2009
Period |
Change |
Yearly change |
1959 - 1969 |
36% |
3.1% |
1969 - 1979 |
34% |
3.0% |
1979 - 1989 |
61% |
4.9% |
1989 - 1999 |
22% |
2.4% |
1999 - 2009 |
62% |
5.0% |
1959 - 2009 |
273% |
2.7% |
As you can see, during the boom years of the Eighties, house prices rose by an average of 4.9% a year above inflation. However, boom followed bust, with real prices falling by 2.4% a year throughout the Nineties.
The strongest decade was the Noughties, when house prices raced ahead of inflation by 5% a year. To me, this strongly above-trend growth makes it highly unlikely that house prices will race ahead over the coming decade.
Indeed, according to the Halifax, there have been four distinct periods of rapid real growth in house prices: 1971-73, 1977-80, 1985-89 and 1998-2007. All of these periods were followed by significant falls in real house prices. Therefore, I suspect that -- despite a bounce from spring 2009 -- the current property downturn is not done yet.
The great boom in home-ownership
Another clear trend in the Halifax report is the growth in owner-occupiers, combined with falls in social housing and private tenants. Here are the figures:
Year |
Owner occupied |
Social housing |
Private rented |
1961 |
43% |
25% |
33% |
1971 |
50% |
31% |
19% |
1981 |
56% |
33% |
11% |
1991 |
67% |
25% |
9% |
2001 |
69% |
21% |
10% |
2008 |
68% |
18% |
14% |
As you can see, the rate of owner-occupation rose strongly from 43% in 1961 to 69% in 2001. However, during the last housing boom, owner-occupation tailed off, slipping back to 68% in 2008.
The biggest boom in owneroccupier rates happened in the Eighties, thanks (of course) to the Thatcher government introducing the Right to Buy scheme for council tenants. The sale of council houses (1.3 million between 1981 and 1991) caused a sharp decline in the level of social housing -- from 33% in 1981 to just 18% today.
Note that there has been a huge drop in the proportion of privately rented homes: from 33% in 1961 to a mere 9% in 1991. However, growth in buy-to-let investing in the Nineties and Noughties pushed this proportion back up to 14% by 2008.
The new family
For decades, most homes were occupied by married couples. However, with marriage becoming less popular and divorce becoming easier, the proportion of households occupied by one person has soared. Increased longevity, particularly among women, also explains why one-person homes are on the rise, as my third table shows:
Households in England by composition
Year |
Married couple |
One person |
Co-habiting couple |
Lone parent |
Other multi- person |
1971 |
70% |
19% |
1% |
2% |
8% |
1981 |
63% |
23% |
3% |
4% |
7% |
1991 |
55% |
27% |
6% |
5% |
7% |
2001 |
47% |
30% |
9% |
7% |
7% |
2009 |
42% |
33% |
11% |
8% |
7% |
As you can see, the share of households occupied by married couples has fallen from 70% in 1971 to 42% in 2009. The proportion of one-person households has leapt from 19% to 33% over the same period. Also, co-habiting has become much more popular, shooting up from 1% in 1971 to 11% today.
Changing homes, shifting society
Here are a few fascinating snippets from the Halifax report:
Icy WC
In 1960, one in seven households (14%) lacked an inside loo. By 1996, this proportion had fallen to one in 500 (0.2%). As a young boy in the early Seventies, I remember when my grandparents' home was extended to include an inside toilet. This improvement made winters up North a lot less cruel, I can tell you!
Creature comforts
In 1971, over a third of British homes (35%) had central heating. By 2000, this proportion had almost tripled to 92%. In other words, 11 out of 12 British homes now have central heating. Cosy.
More people = more homes
Between 1961 and 2009, the UK population rose by nine million, from 52.8 million to 61.8 million. Of course, the number of households has followed suit, rising from 16.7 million in 1961 to 26.6 million in 2009 -- a rise just short of ten million. At the same time, the average number of people per dwelling has fallen from 3.17 in 1961 to 2.32 in 2009. So, families aren't as large as they once were.
Between 1959 and 2009, 13 million homes were built. Driven by local authorities, house-building peaked in the Sixties, with 425,800 units completed in 1968 alone. However, thanks to a sharp fall in local-authority projects and fewer private-sector builds, fewer than 157,000 dwellings were built in 2009.
And finally...
It's quite clear from Halifax's report that massive changes in British society have also been reflected in changing demand for property, particularly as living alone becomes more common.
Of course, the huge boom in owner-occupation which began in the Eighties is an event which cannot be repeated. Indeed, with almost seven in ten homes being owner-occupied, homeowners are now firmly in the majority.
This report also dispels a common myth: that house prices always go up. In fact, over the past 50 years, real house prices (after deducting retail price inflation) fell in 15 years, which is 30% of the time.
In addition, the powerful British desire to own a home often pushes up house prices to unsustainable levels. The property boom of 1995-2007, followed by the crash which began in the summer of 2007, is a perfect example of what happens when bubbles get over-inflated.
Lastly, the 62% real rise in house prices between 1999 and 2009 was the largest on record. It's highly likely that such a strong rise should be followed by an equally powerful bust. So, watch this space, because I'm still far from convinced that the worst is over for UK house prices...
Use lovemoney.com's great new mortgage tool to find your ideal mortgage
Get help from lovemoney.com
If you need help getting the best home loan, then use our resources.
First, adopt this goal: Cut the cost of your mortgage and pay it off early
Next, watch this: Getting through the mortgage maze
After, wander over to Q&A to ask other lovemoney.com members for hints and tips about what worked best for them.
At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.
More: The best mortgages for first-time buyers | The truth about property and wealth in Britain
Most Recent
Comments
-
With regard to the idea that women working and not staying at home is a modern one is wrong. Apart from in Upper and Middle Class Victorian society, women have always had to work to contribute to the household in order for families to survive. Historically Working Class women didn't go OUT to work but helped on the farms, did sewing and weaving at home, ran lodgings and taverns from their homes and all manner of other tasks alongside bringing up the children and keeping the family fed and cared for. In many ways, the Victorian Middle Class tried to rewrite the history books to fit in with their schemes by saying that women didn't work, but the average family couldn't afford to only have the man working so the whole household contributed. This was particularly the case with the rural population, who were in the majority in Pre-Victorian Britain. All we've done is to come full circle as a society with the whole family having to contribute to the household to supply that family with anything more than the basics.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Illus1200 and others............... be reassured - us baby boomers are here for a very longtime yet! Pare down your expectations of massive amounts of property coming to market for a good 30-40 years.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
UpHillAllThe Way. Your dad thought 'women would regret getting equality...' The no of women I know who would just love to have a man to look after them and stay home to have kids would surprise you. These include women who are highly professional, competent and succecssful in their career. Alas. The men are too scared to chase after the women these days. And the result of equality ? Single person homes and lone parents. As they say, nothing is free in life. Be careful what you wish for. I dont think your dad missed the mark.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
02 February 2010