Over 65? You're sitting on a £765bn goldmine!

Millions of pensioners across the UK are sitting on a vast sum of money that could be used to give them a far more comfortable retirement...
How we pay for our lifestyles in retirement is back on the political agenda. All of the main parties have been looking at the issue in recent weeks, with the classic solution of encouraging people to build up their personal pensions and savings safety nets constantly highlighted.
However, many pensioners are overlooking the goldmine you are sitting on – or more accurately, sitting in – which could release some serious cash and lead to a far more comfortable retirement:
Your home!
£765bn and counting
According to new research from equity release adviser Key Retirement Solutions, retired homeowners in the UK own property outright worth an incredible £765.18bn.
Let’s take a look at where that property is owned, and how much it’s worth:
Region |
Property equity in homes owned outright by people aged 65+ |
Percentage of total value of property equity belonging to people aged 65+ |
Households in the region owned outright by people aged 65+ |
South East |
£123.44 billion |
16.13% |
590,000 |
London |
£122.65 billion |
16.03% |
364,800 |
South West |
£115.64 billion |
15.11% |
657,800 |
North West |
£80.63 billion |
10.54% |
684,200 |
East |
£74.94 billion |
9.79% |
432,000 |
East Midlands |
£56.02 billion |
7.32% |
433,400 |
West Midlands |
£47.72 billion |
6.24% |
345,600 |
Scotland |
£45.79 billion |
5.98% |
292,800 |
Yorks/Humbs |
£33.94 billion |
4.44% |
271,700 |
Wales |
£33.97 billion |
4.44% |
273,000 |
North East |
£30.41 billion |
3.97% |
277,200 |
GREAT BRITAIN |
£765.18 billion |
4,622,500 |
OK, so there is a concentration of wealth in London and the South East, but even in the North East, property owned by pensioners is worth a whopping £30.41bn! That’s an awful lot of money many pensioners are sitting on, while scraping the pennies together to get by.
Annuity rates are dismal, the State Pension is on its last legs, and many of us simply aren’t saving enough to get by once we wave goodbye to the world of work. The idea of using an asset such as your home to help pay the bills is a sensible one, albeit one which produces emotive responses. So what are the options?
Downsizing
If you are sitting on a property worth a decent whack, the first obvious way to make use of that asset is to move to a smaller property.
Related goal

Get ready to retire
There are a lot of things to think about as you get closer to your retirement. But the early you start to prepare, the better.
Do this goalThe logic is simple – the smaller property is cheaper, therefore you make money out of the deal which can then be used to help you get by.
There are a few flaws though. From a practical point of view, there are additional costs associated with moving house which you can not avoid, such as solicitor’s fees and the like, which may make a small dent into your profits from the transaction.
However, more importantly for many older people, they love their home and are loathe to leave it, just for the sake of making a bit of money. They most likely know the area, know the people, and don’t want to take a step into the unknown, besides the fact that the smaller property may not have enough room for them. Similarly, a new property may not be affordable in an area near their family.
- Adopt this goal: Get ready to retire
Equity release
And now for the controversial option – equity release.
The industry has an abysmal reputation in some people’s eyes, due to the sins committed a couple of decades ago by some pretty nasty pieces of work who preyed on vulnerable pensioners and robbed them blind.
Thankfully, the industry has undergone radical changes since then, and is regulated by the FSA.
So how does it work?
You have two options – a lifetime mortgage and a home reversion.
The lifetime mortgage
With a lifetime mortgage, you take out a loan against the value of your property. However, you still retain complete ownership of your home.
Equity release doesn't deserve its dodgy reputation
In exchange you will get either a lump sum or a regular income, and the debt will only be paid off once the property is sold off (most likely after you have passed away).
What happens in between those two points varies depending on the type of lifetime mortgage you go for. There are various different versions including a rolled-up lifetime mortgage (where the interest on the mortgage is rolled up each year and paid off when the home is sold) and an interest-only version (you pay the interest on the loan each month, and the capital is repaid when the home is sold).
- Watch this video: Equity release is not dodgy!
The home reversion
The key difference with a home reversion is that you do not retain complete ownership of the home. Instead you sell a portion (or even all) of your home to the provider, in exchange for either a lump sum or regular income.
You can carry on living there, and the reversion provider cannot sell the property until you die or move into care. However, you will need to pay some rent (usually quite small, though it varies) to the provider each month.
Value for money?
Just as with downsizing, there will be additional costs with equity release. Many providers only offer their products through independent advisers (and that can only be a good thing in my view), with the costs generally coming to around £1,500.
Hardly small change.
Equity release mortgages also rarely look too enticing, as they are priced slightly higher than traditional mortgages. There is also currently a depressing lack of competition in the market, due to the withdrawal of a number of lenders, due to a lack of funding.
And then there is the issue of the inheritance you leave to your children. These deals need to be repaid once you’ve died, which means you won’t be leaving your kids quite as much money as they may have been expecting. That’s definitely a conversation you need to have with them before you go ahead with an equity release deal.
An essential option
For all that, I still think equity release has an important role to play, particularly if you are a pensioner that is asset rich but cash poor.
There’s no point struggling to get by when you’re sitting on an asset worth a small fortune. It’s no replacement for traditional funding for retirement obviously – a decent pension is essential for example, and it pays to avoid this annuity mistake that many of us are making – but it fills a vital space in the retirement funding sphere.
It is also a much safer option than previously, particularly now that almost all lenders offer a no negative equity guarantee and follow a strict code of conduct. As a result, no matter what, when you do pass on your surviving family won’t be left out of pocket.
Equity release will not be for everybody, but I think it can make a real difference to your standard of life in your twilight years. What do you think? Please let us know your views using the comments box below!
More: Ten easy ways to grab extra cash | Move to a better ISA today!
Most Recent
Comments
-
I don't see why pensioners" sitting on a goldmine" cannot obtain an ordinary mortgage not have to pay exorbitant interest rates. Although they won't be around to pay say. a 25 year mortgage, the bank cannot fail to recuperate it's money as it is already there, in bricks and mortar. If they can afford to make the repayments but have run out of actual cash. they should be able to obtain the best deal on the market just the same as anyone else, in fact more so than most people. Obtaining a loan and not paying anything until death is like signing a blank cheque , neither should they be penalised if they can suddenly pay it off earlier. Some of us still have our brain power intact.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
I have found equity release brilliant. I have paid off a big chunk of my daughter's mortgage, so she has the money now. when she needs it , rather than waiting for 'jam tomorrow'. Provided I live for seven years after giving her the money, she will not have any tax to pay on it. Goodness know how much tax will be brought in to grab what I leave when I die. I don't want to leave a lot for the taxman. I have also paid for an expensive lift for myself from my equity release. This means that living in a top floor flat with wonderful views, that I love, will be OK as I get more doddery. I have a friend who goes all round the world visiting operas and exciting places like the antarctic with equity release money. I have another friend who uses equity release money to have fun. A great idea - spend the money that the equity in your house has provided for you.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
[i]Viager...[i]provides a fairer return to the home owner.[/i][/i] Certainly can do: the world's longest-lived person, Jeanne Calment entered into an [i]en viager [/i]agreement on her apartment at the age of 90 in return for a monthly income. By the time she died at the age of 122 she had outlived the purchaser! Obviously like an annuity it can seem poor value if you die early on in the arrangement, but on the other hand you're dead, so what do you care?
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
25 October 2010