Did your house make more than you last month?

Property prices booming during traditional slowdown.
Your house may have made more than you did last month, according to new figures from Rightmove.
The UK property listing website has revealed the asking price of new property coming to market jumped an average of £2,550 (0.9%) in September.
Rightmove says it’s the largest rise in the month of September since 2002, driven by increases in the cost of family homes, which have gone up 1.2%.
This is a surprising jump as historically house prices tend to stall around this time of year thanks to the effects of a holiday-season lull.
The rise means the typical asking price of property coming onto the market now stands at an average of £294,834, a new national record.
The biggest earner
London saw the biggest jump in house prices between August and September. Prices in the capital jumped £13,177 on average.
Rightmove says that the average price of a home coming to market in London is at an all-time high of £620,003.
The annual rate of increase for properties in London is 9.5% (the equivalent of £53,923) as the imbalance between supply and demand intensifies and international buyers continue to flood the market.
Rightmove calculates that if annual price growth on its current trajectory was maintained for the next five years, the average price of a London home will reach £1 million by 2020.
Other top earners
Here are the 15 counties that experienced the biggest house price jump in the last month outside of London according to Rightmove.
We’ve ordered the table by the largest average jump in asking prices.
County |
Average price September 2015 |
Average price August 2015 |
Average asking price increase in one month |
West Sussex |
£375,155 |
£364,007 |
£11,148 |
Cambridgeshire |
£291,636 |
£281,270 |
£10,366 |
Essex |
£334,472 |
£324,220 |
£10,252 |
Surrey |
£545,841 |
£537,270 |
£8,571 |
Hampshire |
£321,589 |
£313,535 |
£8,054 |
Berkshire |
£430,486 |
£422,546 |
£7,940 |
Kent |
£341,585 |
£334,050 |
£7,535 |
Buckinghamshire |
£432,692 |
£426,163 |
£6,529 |
Avon |
£291,326 |
£285,419 |
£5,907 |
Oxfordshire |
£437,042 |
£431,701 |
£5,341 |
Somerset |
£288,413 |
£283,557 |
£4,856 |
Dorset |
£324,841 |
£320,529 |
£4,312 |
Gloucestershire |
£290,478 |
£288,080 |
£2,398 |
East Sussex |
£354,284 |
£352,730 |
£1,554 |
Hertfordshire |
£460,956 |
£460,074 |
£882 |
Source: Rightmove
On average these properties, which are all located in the south of England saw an increase of 1.8%, double the national average of 0.9% for the month.
Surrey, Hertfordshire, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire are the top five most expensive areas outside London.
Property rich getting richer
Rightmove says its latest figures show the property rich are getting richer.
All four of the already highly-priced southern regions of England and Wales have gotten even more expensive, with an average 1.3% rise in property prices month on month.
In contrast, the six northern regions in England and Wales with already low-priced properties are seeing prices fall further. The average decline between August and September was 0.9%.
What’s clear in both cases though is that there are fewer properties coming onto the market.
Property listings in the north were down 4.7%, while in the south they were down by 7.1% this month compared to the same period the year before.
More on mortgages and home:
New landlord legislation will make it tougher to evict tenants
Parents shell out extra £30,000 for home in right school catchment area
Nearly a million interest-only mortgage borrowers at risk of repossession
Most Recent
Comments
-
The England and Wales Land Registry has a great online tool for looking at house prices. I looked at prices by region from Jan 2000 to current. While house prices hit a peak in 2008 in every region and then fell, those in the South have now overtaken that 2008 peak, while those in the North haven't. In the most Northerly regions house prices are flat for the past five years!! The dividing line between North and South is from the Severn to the Wash. The most Northerly regions are above a line from the Mersey to the Humber. Sales are only 2/3 of the levels pre 2008 in the South and circa 1/2 in the North. You get a better understanding of what is happening by looking at the longer term and giving less weight to the short term noise. I live in London and my property has increased in a value a lot. It really only means that I can live in a decent care home at the end of my life for longer than would otherwise be the case before the dosh runs out. Day to day it makes absolutely no difference to me at all.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
We've seen these massive increases before. We bought our first house in 1972 for £10,500 and sold it 2 years later for £20,000. I was earning £1,200 a year. The difference then was that the interest rates were much higher than now and we had rampant inflation. We only managed the mortgage repayments by taking in lodgers. In those days people were prepared to share bedrooms - they won't these days! It wasn't all 'the good old days'. The wait for a telephone line was 18 months.Times have changed.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Supply of housing is inelastic, and at any one point in time is fixed. Supplying more housing takes a long time and is constrained by other supply issues, like land, planning permission, materials and labour. There is also the supply of existing property into the market, but as people live longer this aspect is actually reducing. There is increased demand for housing from increased life expectancy, people wanting to live by themselves rather than with others (e.g. leaving home or divorce) and net inward immigration. If housing supply doesn't keep pace then in the long term prices will rise. Short term other factors like mortgage availability and consumer confidence may have an impact but the longer term trend will be for prices to rise. Therefore we need to build more homes. This will provide work here, tax revenues here, lower house prices and better housing accommodation for families. Win Win situation. As it is with new housing supply not keeping up with demand, the existing housing stock becomes more crowded (this is what is actually happening although the demand is for less crowded accommodation). People have to live somewhere, hence existing homes are occupied more densely. Those in their own homes aren't immune - think of the adult children who can't afford to move out! We need to build more - but so many people refuse to face the facts - including our politicians, of all parties because they fear the NIMBY backlash from the property asset rich.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
08 October 2015