Top

Hung parliament is a disaster for house prices

The housing market may have staged a recovery over the past year, but I think that will now come to a sharp halt.

How long did you manage to stay up? I made it to 3.30 am before finally calling it a night, once it was absolutely clear that there would be a hung parliament.

It now appears clear that David Cameron and the Conservative Party will have an opportunity to rule in a minority Government, but I predict the lack of a decisive winner will emphatically put the brakes on the recovery that the housing market has staged over the past 12 months.

Why? The market had begun to slow down anyway ahead of the General Election, with many buyers and sellers opting to adopt a ‘Wait and See’ approach. This was borne out by figures from the Bank of England this week which showed a quite drastic slowing in mortgage lending. Net lending secured on dwellings in March increased just £0.3bn compared to £1.8bn in February (the preceding two months also totalled far higher levels - £1.5bn and £1.4bn respectively).

Given that this is normally the time of year that we would see a decent Spring bounce, this is a clear sign that the brakes have already been applied somewhat. Those brakes will now be applied even more sharply following the General Election result.

Related goal

Sell your home

If you want to obtain the best possible price when selling your home, then these ideas should help.

This is because there is now bound to be a period of horse trading over any housing issues just to get any changes through. In many ways, a decisive result (in any direction) would have been better for the housing market as at least there would be some certainty over the future direction for the market.

Stamp Duty

Let’s start with the one housing issue that did receive some decent national exposure – the Stamp Duty tax. In what looks like being Alistair Darling’s last Budget, a temporary raise in the threshold to £250,000, albeit only for first-time buyers, was instituted. The Conservatives want to make this permanent. But would they be able to get the required legislation through? I’m not so sure, particularly when the Lib Dems want a wholesale restructure of the tax.

Indeed, would it even make it into their first Budget, given the state of the economy? Again, I’m a little sceptical.

HIPs

What about home information packs (HIPs)? While the Tories (and much of the housing industry to be fair) decry the packs as one of the worst property wastes of money ever, and demand they be scrapped, Labour are big fans, while the Lib Dems want to cut the packs themselves but keep an element of them. Any possible reform of this area will almost certainly have to wait.

Housebuilding

The biggest issue, the elephant in the room if you like, is of course housebuilding itself. It’s been clear for years that the level of housing stock in the UK is simply too small to meet the demand, particularly with the population continuing to grow. This is the one area where each of the parties have some quite distinctive plans. I’ve written before about my belief that the Tory plans for housebuilding will not only fail to address the shortage, but they will also push house prices up.

John Fitzsimons looks at some simple ways to boost the value of your home.

But all of that is a fairly moot point given there is very little chance of actually getting any legislation containing the plans through a hung parliament.

And until that uncertainty is addressed, it’s hard to imagine the banks are going to be keen to up their mortgage lending. They have too much to lose. Indeed, the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries has emphasised that the nation’s current budget deficit will only serve to increase the cost of mortgage funding – in other words it will start to cost us more to buy our homes. Again, without a majority, it will be somewhat difficult for the Conservatives to take real action on the budget deficit.

Are there any winners from this? According to financial analyst Jones Lang LaSalle, UK housing will now represent an even more attractive bet for foreign investors. The analysts suggest that a hung parliament will put further pressure on sterling. As a result the lower volatility of the housing market will be more appealing than things like the bond and equity markets.

So in short, any help for first-time buyers, changes to HIPs, reform of the planning process and the mortgage lending world look like they will be in limbo for a while.

Hardly time to pop the champagne is it?

Tell us what you think

Tell us what you think the hung parliament means for the housing market using the comments box below!

Compare mortgages at lovemoney.com

More: Follow our step-by-step guide to buying and selling your home | Find a magnificent mortgage at lovemoney.com

Most Recent


Comments



  • 15 May 2010

    Where are house prices heading, just take a look at Ireland, Greece and the States. A hung parliament has created uncertainty, but two heads are better than one.  The Olympics, coupled with cheap credit caused house prices to sky rocket. When individual householders are unable to service their debts then we have a potential problem. This is beginning to fade at the moment, but do not be fooled. Uncertainty, low employment, property bubble, double dip recession - all point to a disaster. Time will tell. 

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 10 May 2010

    Ok Folks, yes we hold creditials but they get checked every 6 months. Our credit rating is checked throughout the year. I and the good landlords have nothing to hide, we have our offices open to the public to inspect when ever the wish to during office hours no problem with that. Not every property is Inspected by us, it is the choice of the landlord if he wants a letting agent to check every 3 months, some Companies ask for 2 month checks.Those that our Inspected fall under the Fully Managed service the landlord requires. On a tenant find basis only its down to the landlord to arrange his own Inspection. Again the good landlord will Inspect his property on a regulat basis, the good tenant does not have a problem with this. Our plan to purchase B2L properties was long term, its a long term investment, that way we keep profits low but suficient to cover maintenance & repairs. The aim is to sell in the future when the market is right in order to achieve the best possible price, the aim has never been short term. If you are in business you will know that long term growth and expansion is best. Yes I hope it allows me to be able to retire & I only have myself to depend upon. No I do not have to defend what I do nor do some of you have to be hard on those that are trying to provide a service, a service that is needed & at the same provide them selves with a living and not dependant on the country for support. Who ever we are & what ever we do can change & we could end up being dependant on others and we should all remeber that. This story has got out of hand because of the misunderstanding of some of you on how a business is run and for what motives. ---------- I think the market will pick up, I think that Interest rates will stay low, I think that rental & property sales will continue side by side for many years to come. Remember though, those that rent, you do not have to sign the agreement if you dont like the terms.  

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

  • 10 May 2010

    Lovemoney evolved from the carpet-bagging phenomenon where people, like me, made an easy picking from demutualisation. This was on the back of the Thatcer garage sell-off of our utilities, public housing stock and introduction of external bidding for council maintenance work. Anybody now not clear of what has happened to those ex BS's? Anybody not sure of why we're short of essential housing? How well those middle-class downsizers did out of the housing boom! Thatcherism and the Blair/Brown era of hands-off government convinced me of the disaster of leaving the running of the country to one party (and even one person if the reports of what Cabinet government is really like). Capitalism is a good idea that doesn't really work - unchecked it eats rapaciously like swarming locusts and then flies off to eat elsewhere. Nothing is going to go down the pan in a few days or weeks of negotiation whilst we get a government of consensus. I suspect anyone who walks around bewailing "hung-parliament" - their cause is transparent. They're free-marketeers desperate to see a Tory government back in power so they can speculate freely again. Housing is not a commodity to be used so - it is an essential utility for the general good of the nation. It needs to be priced at an affordable level - because everyone needs to live somewhere and needs to live without the sword of eviction/repossession hanging over their heads. Then their lives become better, they work harder and have more money to spread around. They may even be happier.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    0

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.