UK solar panel subsidy cut: are solar panels still worth it?

Subsidies for solar panels are set to be slashed. So is it still worth having solar panels?
Subsidies for solar panels are to be slashed significantly, raising questions about whether they remain a worthwhile investment.
When you produce more energy than you need via your solar panels, that energy goes into the National Grid, for which you are paid money. From 8 February 2016, installers of rooftop solar panels will be paid just 4.39p per kilowatt hour (kWh) for producing electricity for the National Grid, rather than the current subsidised rate of 12.47p. In other words, in a matter of weeks, solar subsidies for homeowners will be cut by almost two-thirds.
In its defence, the Government claims that it has backtracked on previous plans to cut solar subsidies to just 1.63p per kWh (a reduction of 86.9%).
The Conservative Government argues that renewable subsidies must be cut, in order to reduce the impact of rising renewable subsidies on household energy bills.
This seems like an absurd argument, given that the UK is the only nation in the G7 group that is actually increasing fossil-fuel subsidies. Incredibly, the UK spends a whopping £27 billion a year subsidising fossils fuels, which works out at £425 a year (or more than £35 a month) for each of the 63.7 million adults and children in Britain.
"Huge, misguided cuts"
Of course, Green and environmental activists were quick to denounce this decision.
Alasdair Cameron, renewable-energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, warned: "These huge, misguided cuts to UK solar are a massive blow for jobs and the economy and further undermine the Government’s already tarnished credibility on tackling climate change."
Barbara Stoll at environmental pressure group Greenpeace responded to the cuts by saying: "If the Government is as committed as it claims to be to the Paris climate deal, then solar is one of the cheapest and safest ways for the UK to deliver on it."
Furthermore, one Government impact-assessment review of the 65% subsidy cut warned that it could hammer employment in the solar sector, costing up to 18,700 out of the total 32,000 workers currently employed in the industry.
Moreover, the Solar Trade Association has warned that around 6,500 jobs have recently been lost in the solar sector, thanks to installation companies shutting up shop ahead of previously proposed subsidy cuts.
Open a Stocks & Shares ISA today
Is it worth installing solar panels in future?
This latest blow strikes me as incredibly bone-headed.
According to the Solar Trade Association, the new subsidy cut and £100 million cap will halve the number of domestic solar installations here in the UK, almost killing off this blooming market at a stroke.
The total cost of providing generous subsidies to solar-generated electricity amounts to a mere £7 a year for each UK household. The subsidies given to oil and gas, coal and nuclear power are hundreds of times larger. What's more, these are set to increase substantially, thanks to new tax breaks for North Sea oil producers and explorers introduced in the March Budget.
So what should households do? After February, will it no longer be viable to install solar panels on the roof of your home?
Thankfully, one trend in your favour is that the cost of solar-power generation has tumbled, thanks to modern technology. In fact, the expense has fallen by roughly half over the past seven or eight years. As solar panels become ever-more efficient, the cost of producing electricity from them will likely continue to fall.
Nevertheless, industry experts warn that the cost of installing rooftop solar panels may not make financial sense for many. Juliet Davenport, chief executive of renewable-energy utility Good Energy, warned: "The new measures are a slight improvement on the original proposals, but still mean that installing solar panels will no longer be attractive to British homeowners."
Another problem facing UK householders, both before and after the subsidy cut takes effect, is that many more solar-panel installers will surely go out of business over the next 12 months. James Court, head of policy at the Renewable Energy Association, said: "The tariffs are still very challenging and while the changes will help save some [firms] in the industry, it remains the case that many will be exiting."
How can British householders confidently order new solar panels, when they know there is some risk that their supplier or installer could go under at almost any time?
Open a Stocks & Shares ISA today
Become an investing whizz!
Most Recent
Comments
-
The usual green cherry-picking and obfuscation. Energy from renewable is about 7% of total production, so subsidies for renewables should be £27bn*7%=£1.89bn. However, that's far exceeded by the billions spent on linking remote wind farms to the grid and providing almost one-to-one on-demand power generation for when wind and solar is not producing.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
On the upside hopefully now we won't have to put up with any further increment on the eyesores of the hideous lumps of glass adorning so many rooftops. Solar panels are as decorative to homes as wall cladding and satellite dishes, all should be outlawed from our street scenes especially in rural and protected areas Don't get me wrong I'm in favour of the principle of green energy but not when it's so unnecessarily and abhorrently overides all other sensibilities. Sadly this latest ruling will probably be the death knell for the further development of solar roof tiles and slate which overcame the sad aesthetics of conventional solar panels.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
dgoadby, There's no easy way to determine accurately "how much is fed back into the grid". An assumption is made that half of the power generated is fed-back. A small payment is made for those 50% of units but the largest element by far is for the generation. The concept here is to reward for generating as to do so implies there's less demand on the grid for power that MAY have been generated by burning fossil fuel. Whilst I agree with you about lawywers and real-life experience in this case they've achieved their objective - namely to get a large number of people to pay up-front for the panels and receiv a drip-feed repayment. Also, it's my understanding that whilst everyone talks about feeding power back INTO the grid your local sub-station will stop that power heading outwards. In reality, the power you generate is fed to all those houses in your immediate vicinity and on the same side as the transformer. This is why too many houses close-by with large arrays on their rooves would cause a problem. In answer to the quandary re. sunny days making loads of power when it's not needed in the house etc etc. it is possible to install a large number of batteries (probably marine batteries would be best) and these would absorb power during the sunny day and release it during the dark night. Cost is the issue - and space. I'm waiting for removable battery packs for electric cars. I'd buy two packs, charge one during the day whilst I'm out driving using the pack I'd charged the day before.....with my solar panels of course.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
23 December 2015