It's cheaper to buy than to rent!

In most of Britain, it may actually work out cheaper to buy your home than to rent it.
Should you carry on renting, or is now the time to take the plunge?
When working out the answer to this question, it's not just your own finances and whether you can afford to take on a mortgage that you should consider. The location of the property also plays a big part.
Zoopla.co.uk, a property information website, has put together a brand new index aimed at discovering where in the UK it is better to rent rather than buy, and vice versa. The index compares current asking prices to average rents for two bedroom flats in the top 50 locations across the UK.
Interestingly, according to Zoopla, buying a property actually works out to be cheaper in 74% of locations. That's three-quarters of the country where it makes more financial sense to purchase your home, rather than rely on the rental sector, a figure that strikes me as a touch high in all honesty.
Where renting comes out top
First though, let's take a look at Zoopla's findings, starting with the 10 locations where it makes the most sense to rent, rather than buy.
Rank |
Location |
Average asking price |
Average monthly rent |
Rent/Buy Ratio |
1 |
Huddersfield |
£146,898 |
£493 |
1.24 |
2 |
Oldham |
£153,228 |
£549 |
1.16 |
3 |
Brighton |
£274,231 |
£1,035 |
1.10 |
4 |
Swansea |
£185,925 |
£702 |
1.10 |
5 |
Edinburgh |
£179,583 |
£693 |
1.08 |
6 |
Bournemouth |
£181,772 |
£711 |
1.07 |
7 |
Bristol |
£189,691 |
£743 |
1.06 |
8 |
Cardiff |
£153,741 |
£614 |
1.04 |
9 |
Plymouth |
£157,546 |
£630 |
1.04 |
10 |
Stockport |
£143,721 |
£579 |
1.03 |
Topping the list of places where it makes more sense to rent than to buy is Huddersfield, where rent stands at a pretty cheap-looking £493 a month. Considering the average rent across the North West region currently stands at £563.42 a month, according to rental experts Paragon, Huddersfield certainly does look decent value.
But the one result here that really caught my eye is Brighton, which commands a whopping average monthly rent in excess of £1,000, a good £300 more than any of the other members of the top 10. However, it still makes sense to rent in Brighton due to the mammoth house prices, no doubt influenced by the fact that not only does the town offer life by the sea, but it's also an easy commute into London.
Where buying is cheaper
What about the other end of the scale? Where does it work out to be more economically sensible to purchase your home, according to Zoopla?
Rank |
Location |
Average asking price |
Average monthly rent |
Rent/Buy Ratio |
1 |
Dundee |
£88,263 |
£530 |
0.69 |
2 |
Birmingham |
£131,546 |
£765 |
0.72 |
3 |
Derby |
£100,483 |
£562 |
0.74 |
4 |
Cambridge |
£193,577 |
£1,046 |
0.77 |
5 |
Milton Keynes |
£135,633 |
£728 |
0.78 |
6 |
Walsall |
£94,437 |
£493 |
0.80 |
7 |
Nottingham |
£123,160 |
£633 |
0.81 |
8 |
York |
£174,225 |
£891 |
0.81 |
9 |
Peterborough |
£116,481 |
£589 |
0.82 |
10 |
Norwich |
£130,729 |
£655 |
0.83 |
So Dundee takes top spot, with property available at just £88,263. When you consider that according to Zoopla's own Zed Index, the current average value of property across the UK is £220,533, it's clear that Dundee represents some serious value.
Indeed, other than Cambridge, all of the towns in the top 10 boast property priced well below the national average.
An issue with the methodology
So, taking the research on face value, for the majority of us we should be rushing off to buy our homes, turning our backs on the private rented sector.
John Fitzsimons looks at how to work out what offer to make on a property.
Inevitably, it's not quite as simple as that, as I have to take issue with the methodology Zoopla has used for this calculation. When calculating mortgage costs, Zoopla has based it on an interest-only mortgage at 5%, which is not really the mortgage model most buyers in the UK adopt.
As a result, interesting as these results are, you will need to factor in that if you're paying off your mortgage on a capital repayment basis, the mortgage costs will likely be substantially higher than those quoted by Zoopla.
Time to act
It's worth noting that Zoopla acknowledges its perceived balance of power in favour of buying may not last that long. It reckons that just a 1% increase in Bank Base Rate would lead to renting becoming more financially sensible in a whopping 80% of locations across the UK.
Of course, all the signs are that Bank Base Rate will stay where it is for some time yet – indeed, even Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, this week said it will be some time yet before interest rates return to more 'normal' levels. However, if the credit crunch has taught us anything it's that when it comes to the economy, things can change very quickly.
So if you are planning to get on the property ladder, these are some of the brilliant mortgages you should be considering.
15 fabulous first-time buyer mortgages
Lender |
Mortgage |
Interest rate |
Maximum loan-to-value |
Fee |
Two-year tracker |
2.24% (tracks base rate + 1.74%) |
70% |
2% of advance |
|
Two-year tracker |
2.39% (tracks base rate + 1.89%) |
75% |
£995 |
|
Two-year tracker |
3.04% (tracks base rate + 2.54%) |
80% |
2% of advance |
|
Lifetime tracker |
2.79% (tracks base rate + 2.29%) |
75% |
£99 |
|
Lifetime tracker |
3.99% (tracks base rate + 3.49%) |
85% |
£99 |
|
Two-year fixed |
2.89% |
75% |
£995 |
|
Two-year fixed |
3.69% |
80% |
£945 |
|
Two-year fixed |
4.95% |
90% |
£995 |
|
Three-year fixed |
3.49% |
75% |
£499 |
|
Three-year fixed |
3.69% |
80% |
£800 |
|
Three-year fixed |
4.69% |
85% |
£999 |
|
Five-year fixed |
4.75% |
80% |
£999 |
|
Five-year fixed |
5.29% |
85% |
£995 |
|
Seven-year fixed |
5.29% |
80% |
£1,495 |
|
Ten-year fixed |
6.59% |
85% |
£995 |
More: 19 top 90% mortgages! | Big cities should expect house price falls
At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.
This article aims to give information, not advice. Always do your own research and/or seek out advice from an FSA-regulated broker (such as one of our brokers here at lovemoney.com), before acting on anything contained in this article.
Finally, we tend to only give the initial rate of a deal in our articles, but any deal which lasts for a shorter period than your mortgage term will revert to the lender's standard variable rate when the deal ends. Before you take out a deal, you should always try to find out from your lender what its standard variable rate is and how it will be determined in the future. Make sure you take all this information into account when comparing different deals.
Most Recent
Comments
-
@matchmade I agree that in the short term renting is usually cheaper, when you include all the costs of buying. Although you need to remember that a good BTL landlord will usually include such costs in their rental calculations anyway. However, you have missed out on the biggest difference between renting and buying in the long term. Whilst interest rates may fluctuate, rents will *always* rise with inflation in the long term. Even if the market is absolutely static, rents will rise with salaries as people look to move to a better properrty as they are promoted and their salary increases. So over the long term renting will always turn out more expensive, regardless of any capital gains made on the house. For that reason alone, comparisons like those John has made above are largely worthless. You should rent if you only plan to stay somewhere for a short while, and buy if you plan to stay for a long time, unless your circumstances are very peculiar.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
[b]"There's also the cost of paying off the capital of a mortgage, whereas someone who rents has relatively stable and predictable outgoings, and can use any surplus income to invest in ISAs or a pension."[/b] Except someone who rents is vulnerable to rent increases. And someone who purchases using a mortgage will (generally, if they don't MEW) see real-term falls in their outgoings. [b]"Rent is not "wasted": all you're doing is contributing to the mortgage interest"[/b] Even assuming that the property speculator has a mortgage this is not true. You're subsidising someone else's mortgage which, as it is solely for their benefit is wasted money. [b]"so the landlord is making no inroads into his or her debt"[/b] Interest-only BTL mortgages were once quite popular. This is because the tenant (usually) covers the mortgage and the speculator gets the accrued equity. That the original debt is only slightly reduced by inflation is neither here nor there. [b]"and is exposed to all the downside risks that a tenant can happily ignore."[/b] Except the tenant is exposed to a different set of "downside risks": Eviction after 6-months, a rise in rents and a landlord who doesn't care about property maintenance. Oh, and let's not forget about Sudden Landlord Bankruptcy Syndrome.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
This exercise of comparing rent versus mortgage interest repayments is much too simplistic. If you factor in possible stamp duty, legal fees, mortgage application and survey fees, mortgage redemption costs (one day), maintenance costs (which can run into thousands of pounds) and exposire to the rising and falling interest rates on the buying side, versus rent application fees on the rental side, it's clear that buying is much more expensive than renting over a short to medium timeframe. Over a longer timeframe, all the added costs of buying and the added risk of wildly-varying interest charges *may* be outweighed by a capital gain on your house purchase, but you're also exposed to the risk of house prices falling just when you want to sell up. There's also the cost of paying off the capital of a mortgage, whereas someone who rents has relatively stable and predictable outgoings, and can use any surplus income to invest in ISAs or a pension. Rent is not "wasted": all you're doing is contributing to the mortgage interest, so the landlord is making no inroads into his or her debt, and is exposed to all the downside risks that a tenant can happily ignore.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
04 August 2010