Top

Opinion: savers don't have it that bad

It may be a decade since we saw a base rate rise, but in many ways savers are in a stronger position today.

Last week marked the 10th anniversary of the last time the Bank of England announced an increase in the Base Rate.

In those heady days in July 2007, the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee increased rates to 5.75% – a figure that seems eye-poppingly high in the current climate – just as it was becoming clear that the global economy was in a spot of bother.

There is no doubt that since then, things have been tougher for savers.

Base rate has fallen, and then languished, at record lows, making it tougher for those putting some cash aside each month to actually get a decent return, particularly when you take inflation into account.

Indeed, according to Hargreaves Lansdown, if you stuck £1,000 in a typical instant access account in July 2007, today it would be worth £1,107.

But when you account for inflation, the real value of that money would be just £878.

Beat inflation or lose money

Beating inflation is really the name of the game when it comes to saving.

As the example from Hargreaves Lansdown shows, you can end up with a higher savings balance but actually lose money in real terms if you fail to do so.

And with inflation rising in recent months, that’s not been so easy to do.

Last month the Office for National Statistics reported that inflation had hit a four-year high at 2.9%, driven by the increasing cost of package holidays, imported computer games, food and clothing.

As a result, financial information site Moneyfacts reported that not a single standard savings account could beat inflation.

However, it’s worth noting the Bank of England’s forecasts for inflation.

In Q4 of this year, the Bank expects inflation to sit at around 2.8%, dropping to 2.4% next year and then 2.2% in 2019.

With the rates on offer from savings deals improving – the number of interest rate increases on savings accounts outweighed cuts for the fifth month running according to Moneyfacts – then it’s perhaps fair to suggest the current situation where inflation is untouchable is more of a temporary blip than the new norm.

It’s also important to remember that there are many, many ways in which the position of savers today is far better than it was back in 2007.

Not convinced? Ditch savings and look at your long-term investment options (capital at risk).

The evolution of peer-to-peer

Back in 2007, peer-to-peer as a concept was very much in its infancy, with Zopa really the only firm offering savers the chance to get a better return on their money by lending directly to other people.

It’s a vastly different situation today, with a host of firms active in this space, allowing you to lend your money to both individuals and businesses and get a cracking rate of interest in return.

What’s more, the peer-to-peer space has grown up significantly in that time. We have an active trade body, the Peer-to-Peer Finance Association, which ensures that firms conduct themselves properly.

There has also been a growing emphasis on security, with lots of peer-to-peer lenders now establishing some form of safety net which will step in and protect your money should a borrower fall into difficulties.

The predicted rates of interest easily beat inflation – Zopa’s Plus account pays a rate of 6.1% for example.

That the market is sufficiently well developed that it now has its own ISA is a terrific sign for savers of all shapes and sizes.

The ISA revolution

Speaking of ISAs, the tax-free savings accounts have been through some significant changes of their own over the last decade, all to the benefit of savers.

For example, today you can save vastly more in one of these tax-free savings accounts than was the case ten years ago.

In 2007 you could save a total of £7,000, of which no more than £3,000 could be in cash. Now we have a limit of £20,000, and you can save that money in whatever format you choose.

Indeed, there are now a host of other ISAs worth a look besides the traditional ones, including the Innovative Finance ISA (in which you can hold certain peer-to-peer investments), the Help to Buy ISA (which offers a Government bonus on your savings in order to help you build a deposit) and the Lifetime ISA (which offers a Government bonus if you use the money towards a deposit or to supplement your pension saving).

The Personal Savings Allowance

Even if you don’t stick your cash in an ISA, the Personal Savings Allowance means that the vast majority of us won’t pay any tax on the interest we earn from our savings pot.

Since April 2016 we all enjoy a £1,000 personal savings allowance; we can earn that much in interest from our savings before having to hand any over to the taxman, a move that means an incredible 95% of savers don’t pay tax on their savings.

Challenging the big boys

Take a look at the savings best buy tables. Chances are the names at the top won’t be the most familiar; challenger banks like RCI, Atom Bank, Al Rayan and Masthaven have all grabbed the attention with interest rates far more impressive than those than you can expect from high street banks.

These challenger banks, often operating almost entirely online, are offering a new way of banking and saving, with better returns to boot.

Savers today have a far wider group of banks to choose from – and with more robust protection in place for savers’ money – than has been the case in recent years.

Even current accounts are a savings alternative!

For those with small amounts of savings, a current account may actually serve as a useful alternative to a dedicated savings account.

For example, the Nationwide FlexDirect Account pays 5% on balances up to £2,500 for the first 12 months, so long as you pay in £1,000 each month, while TSB’s Classic Plus pays 3% on balances of up to £2,000, provided you pay in £500 each month.

Tesco Bank also pays 3% on balances up to £3,000, though you will need to pay in £750 each month.

What do you think? Is John right that the savings environment isn't that bad all things considered? Share your thoughts in the comments section below. As always please keep it clean! We're here to debate issues, not hurl insults.

Don't Miss Out On These Brilliant Deals
Pay off what you owe without the rip-off interest charges or fees with this balance transfer card.
Cash bonuses on offer for new customers but they won't last long.

Most Recent


Comments



  • 17 July 2017

    I'm looking for the positives in this "opinion" for savers and it just isn't there. The BOE, doubtless encouraged by the Government, has created a continuing flood of cheap money into our economy. The banks don't need to compete for our dosh, there's more than they know what to do with on offer. This cheap money has led to very high property prices. I estimate a standard 3 bed semi in harrow (where I live) went up in value by over £50,000 last year. That is bonkers, and while such gains are unrealised until a sale is made it does no good to those looking to buy their first property and high prices for buy to let feeds through into high rents. It actually does little good to owners either unless they move to a much cheaper part of the country. ISA allowances have been increased significantly but the rates on offer for savers for ISA's are lower than those available for non ISA savings - so little incentive there. Higher rates also mean higher risk, and many savers are not in the risk game - just a fair return for their money. Although the left complain about austerity, I've never heard them campaign for the savers of this world. It is undoubtedly true that unemployment has reduced despite austerity (or is that because of austerity - life on benefits is perhaps not so comfortable now!). So things are economy wise OK - but few ever see the next crash coming - and the usual correctional levers available to the authorities have all been in operation since 2007 and would have limited effect when the next crash happens. So its about time the flood of cheap money was ended and interest rates reflected the full employment situation we have now. Once again John we seem to be on opposite sides of the fence. I don't like the abnormally low interest rates not because they harm me personally, but because I think they are harming the long term future of the country. While my interest is down my house price gains have been spectacular. The Government used to collect a lot of tax from savers -, now due the various measures quoted above its almost de minimus. I've argued before that borrowers do much better than savers out of the deal and the tax burden should be switched to borrowers. It might also help to stem the headlong rush into debt that will doubtless cause untold misery when the correction comes -whenever that is. I don't hope for it - its just inevitable that it will happen sooner or later.

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    4

  • 17 July 2017

    This is the most irresponsible report ever from LM. The economy (well, we'll call it that) has been on life support since 2008 with near zero inflation rates. This has to be financed by massive debt (borrowing and printing), which is an unsustainable system. When we run out of debt options, the full force of Gordon's Credit Crunch will kick in. One aspect will be the total collapse of house prices. All those who thought they could make a quick buck from BTL, etc, will be burned alive. I look forward to it. There have been far too many idiots with no idea how to handle debt and money, and have caused this problem in the first place. The age of responsibility and common sense is dead at present, but you don't mess with mother nature and the laws of economics for ever. These will kick back in big time. The outcome will be interesting. With regards to saving, why don't you do a report on Bitcoins, a remarkable success story?

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    3

  • 17 July 2017

    This is why "mutual" building societies have all but vanished. The business model of a building society was to attract people to invest in a savings account, pay them reasonable interest, lend the savers' money to homebuyers, charge them a bit more interest. Savers became shareholders by virtue of investing on their account. And that was pretty much all the mutuals did. The Banks however have many other ways to raise capital, not all of which you may morally agree with. As a result the individual saver is of very little value to them. Plus of course the banks pay their directors far more handsomely, so there it no incentive at all to remain a building society. Nor is there incentive to pay money out in the form of account interest. Hark at me! Mr Grumpy. MeldrewReborn, can I buy your username?

    REPORT This comment has been reported.
    3

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Most Popular

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.