Emissions scandal: VW ordered to buy back test-beating cars

German courts have ordered Volkswagen to cough up for misleading cars.
Thousands of motorists in the UK and overseas were misled when purchasing vehicles a few years ago, as a result of manufacturers fiddling the emissions tests.
Vehicle makers fitted their cars and vans with dodgy software which delivered inaccurate results of these tests, meaning that certain vehicles were presented as being far more environmentally friendly than was actually the case.
And that deception is now catching up with them, with one of the biggest cheating manufacturers ordered to buy back these vehicles, providing conned drivers with the prospect of at least getting some of their money back.
Need finance for your next car? Check your finance options with CarFinance247
Time to pay up
German courts have told Volkswagen that the firm needs to buy back all of the motors it sold with these misleading bits of kit fitted, after it was pursued legally by Herbert Gilbert, who purchased a Volkswagen Sharan in 2014.
The manufacturer won’t have to hand over a full refund though ‒ the court said that it would have to offer payments to affected motorists accounting for depreciation.
In other words, they will get what the vehicle is worth now ‒ in the knowledge that it boasts less impressive emission levels than was initially advertised ‒ rather than what the duped drivers paid initially.
There are currently a whopping 60,000 pending cases in Germany alone.
In a statement, Volkswagen said: “For the majority of the 60,000 pending cases, this ruling provides clarity as to how the [Federal Court of Justice] assesses essential questions in German diesel proceedings.
"Volkswagen is now seeking to bring these proceedings to a prompt conclusion in agreement with the plaintiffs. We will, therefore, approach the plaintiffs with the adequate settlement proposals."
It’s not the first time VW has faced a massive bill from German drivers either, having already settled a separate class action suit involving 235,000 motorists. In that case, it ended up costing the firm a cool £743 million.
What does this mean for British drivers?
Now obviously, it’s worth pointing out that German courts and their rulings do not directly affect us in the UK.
But it will add weight to the cases of the thousands of British motorists who are already considering or actively pursuing claims of their own against the manufacturer.
For example, a group of around 90,000 affected drivers won the first stage of their High Court battle against the various manufacturers tied up in the ‘dieselgate’ scandal. That means the likes of Audi, Seat and Skoda, as well as VW.
Mr Justice Waksman was damning in finding against VW in that hearing, dismissing the claims that ‘defeat devices’ ‒ which beat the emissions tests ‒ had not been fitted as ““completely irrelevant”, “hopeless” and “highly flawed”.
While this is far from the end of matters, it will increase pressure on VW ‒ and other manufacturers ‒ to do the right thing and compensate drivers it conned.
Patrick McGuire, a partner at Thompsons Solicitors which is leading its own case against VW in the Scottish courts, has predicted that, at a conservative estimate, he expects to secure several millions in compensation for his clients.
He said: "There is now no longer any excuse for VW and their highly paid legal defence team to deny justice to the thousands of Scottish consumers they have deceived and defrauded."
Our complete guide to car finance: get the best deal
Why emissions matter
It should go without saying that a vehicle’s emission levels are important for drivers to consider, given the impact on the environment from driving.
The growing number of sales of electric vehicles are in large part down to the fact that they are better for the planet ‒ drivers are well aware of how their actions can impact the environment, and so are more inclined to pick motors that can deliver lower emissions levels.
But there’s a further financial consideration too in the form of vehicle excise duty. The figure you pay in the first year of ownership is directly tied to the car’s emission levels.
While those with the smallest emission levels will pay only £25 or less, the big emitters are far more costly to own, in some cases costing an almighty £2,175 for that first year.
*This article contains affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission on any sales of products or services we write about. This article was written completely independently.
Most Recent
Comments
-
What a lot of people don't get is that to fix the defeat device the 'fix actually caused engine and performance issues. I put my car in for a service and without discussing it with me the garage performed the fix and said nothing. A week later I took the car back as the performance was poor but they said there was nothing wrong and wouldn't look at it. Again they didn't mention the fix but in the following days I got a letter direct from Skoda uk telling me it had been done. Only a couple of weeks later I set off on a 270 mile journey during which the air recirculation system blew and cost £723 to fix. I complained directly to Skoda who whilst not accepting liability repaid the bill. The car has never been the same since...I didn't apply to be part of the class action because Skoda had been fair with me...but I dont want people thinking that this is just a technical issue....I was stranded away from home for 5 days and the car spent having the work done for a simple fix!
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Why get compensated? They probably saved money. Buy Hyundai and this won't happen. Hyundai are to be trusted. I'm surprised people still buy German overpriced cars after all this. And electric cars do not save the planet. The power stations are still polluting that produce the electrical power for these very expensive cars. Also, the exhaust on a petrol car with catalytic converters pollutes a lot less. Diesel engines were never suited for cars, that's why the engine type existed for 100 years before mass fitting to cars (other than Taxis, and for a reason). Diesel is more suited to larger commercial use, like lorries, large marine and power generation. The Labour party started all this by lowering VED on Diesels, all to do with the myth regarding CO2 and so called climate change. When all along Diesels pump out NOx, much more than petrol, and that gas is highly toxic. And carbon particulates as well. Jeese. CO2 actually feeds biomass and we would not exist if it wasn't for that 0.04% in the atmosphere. There doesn't seem to be any logic to any decisions now, it's all poilitised and wrong.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Overtone, contrary to your pessimistic belief I'm not going to weigh in to tell you you're wrong. However, there was an appreciable loss suffered by HMRC when the understatement of CO2 caused a reduced amount of excise duty to be levied. This, I pointed out to David Gauke (transport secretary at the time) via my m.p. Gauke couldn't quite get his head around the concept initially and actually wrote back to me to inform me that VW had cheated the NO (Nitrous Oxide) levels. He perhaps thought there were two exhaust pipes, one for NO and one for CO2. Eventually he got the drift and assured me in a second letter that HM Govt. would keep a very careful eye on the situation. He of course lost his job. Grant whatsit is now the fellow and a further recent letter from me fell on stony ground. Our government is inept and incapable of taking any meaningful action against large corporations. One day, Grant might need a job at some car manufacturer. Best to keep on friendly terms I suspect.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
28 June 2020