The best and worst areas to buy property

Cliff D'Arcy examines 26 years of house-price data to show you which parts of the UK produce the biggest rises in house prices...
Whether property prices are rising (as they did from 1995 to 2007) or falling (as they did from August 2007 to this spring), there seems to be no more popular topic here in the UK. So I've been picking through what is probably the most well-known housing gauge: the Halifax house price indexf. This includes data all the way back to 1983, so it gives us a 26½-year look in the mirror for house prices.
Today, I crunched the numbers in order to find out which regions of the UK have recorded the highest increases in residential property prices since the HHPI began. Here's what I found:
House prices in the United Kingdom
The Halifax index divides up the UK into twelve regions, but let's begin with the results for the nation as a whole:
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£29,993 |
Q3/2009 |
£161,280 |
Change |
£131,287 |
Change |
438% |
Yearly change |
6.6% |
As you can see, the price of the average UK property climbed from under £30,000 to over £161,000 from 1983 to 2009. In fact, the average increase over these 26½ years was 438%, or a compound yearly increase of 6.6% a year. Thus, the double-digit rises in the Noughties were well above this longer-term average, putting us firmly into bubble territory.
Now let's take a look at each of the UK's dozen regions (ranked highest to lowest based on percentage increase in house prices):
House prices in Greater London
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£38,523 |
Q3/2009 |
£245,764 |
Change |
£207,241 |
Change |
538% |
Yearly change |
7.2% |
As one of the wealthiest parts of Europe, London is our outright winner, both for high house prices and superior house-price growth. No surprises there, then. Look at the difference over the past 26½ years: an increase of over £207,000 per property. Wow!
House prices in Northern Ireland
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£24,947 |
Q3/2009 |
£151,299 |
Change |
£126,352 |
Change |
506% |
Yearly change |
7.0% |
Northern Ireland sneaks into second place, with prices more than six times what they were in 1983. This 7%-a-year rise is partly due to the 'peace dividend' which resulted from the cessation of Anglo-Irish hostilities in the Nineties.
House prices in South East
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£39,265 |
Q3/2009 |
£217,109 |
Change |
£177,844 |
Change |
453% |
Yearly change |
6.7% |
Where London goes, the South East follows. Southerners have enjoyed 6.7%-a-year house-price rises since 1983 -- an increase of close to £178,000 per property.
House prices in South West
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£32,307 |
Q3/2009 |
£176,404 |
Change |
£144,097 |
Change |
446% |
Yearly change |
6.6% |
As a popular tourist destination, the South West has done well since 1983, slightly beating the UK average rise (6.62% versus 6.55% a year).
House prices in the West Midlands
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£27,817 |
Q3/2009 |
£150,746 |
Change |
£122,929 |
Change |
442% |
Yearly change |
6.6% |
The West Midlands -- one of the UK's industrial heartlands -- also beat the average for the UK as a whole, but not by much (a mere 0.03% a year, in fact).
House prices in East Anglia
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£28,915 |
Q3/2009 |
£154,646 |
Change |
£125,731 |
Change |
435% |
Yearly change |
6.5% |
I remember house prices exploding in East Anglia during the Eighties boom. Alas, they fell back very steeply in the Nineties crash and, today, have grown at a rate fractionally short of the average rate for the UK as a whole.
House prices in East Midlands
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£25,247 |
Q3/2009 |
£133,887 |
Change |
£108,640 |
Change |
430% |
Yearly change |
6.5% |
After East Anglia is the East Midlands which, again, has seen house-price growth just behind the UK's. Note that house prices remain low in this area when compared to more affluent southern regions.
House prices in Wales
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£25,354 |
Q3/2009 |
£133,442 |
Change |
£108,088 |
Change |
426% |
Yearly change |
6.5% |
Wales saw house prices rise by a slightly below-average 6.5% a year since 1983.
House prices in Yorkshire & Humberside
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£22,512 |
Q3/2009 |
£118,410 |
Change |
£95,898 |
Change |
426% |
Yearly change |
6.5% |
Yorkshire folk have a well-earned reputation for financial prudence. This manifests itself in a slightly below-average rise in house prices (plus lower house prices in general). Also, Yorkshire & Humberside has seen the lowest absolute increase in house prices: a rise since 1983 of below £96,000.
House prices in the North
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£24,538 |
Q3/2009 |
£126,679 |
Change |
£102,141 |
Change |
416% |
Yearly change |
6.4% |
Despite lower incomes and huge job destruction during this period, the North recorded a respectable but below-par rise of 6.4% a year in house prices over the past 26½ years.
House prices in the North West
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£24,968 |
Q3/2009 |
£128,490 |
Change |
£103,522 |
Change |
415% |
Yearly change |
6.4% |
Although it has some affluent areas (such as parts of Cheshire), the North West is dominated big cities such as Liverpool and Manchester. Overall, house prices have climbed by 6.4% a year since Q1 1983.
House prices in Scotland
Quarter |
House price |
Q1/1983 |
£27,808 |
Q3/2009 |
£125,418 |
Change |
£97,610 |
Change |
351% |
Yearly change |
5.8% |
As you can see, Scotland is the UK's poor relation, with lower typical house prices and slower house-price growth since 1983. Indeed, Scotland is the only part of the UK with yearly house-price growth below 6% over this period.
And finally...
It's important to note that my analysis shows only house-price growth across the 12 different regions of the UK. Local variations will be huge, as the poor often rub shoulders with the rich -- particularly in big cities. Also, it doesn't give a full picture of property as an investment, since it doesn't take into account rental income and property-related expenses.
Finally, there has long been a perception of a north-south housing divide. In other words, the further south you go in the UK, the higher the house prices and the faster the house-price growth. The data above tend to reinforce, rather than refute, this rule of thumb!
Get help with your mortgage from lovemoney.com
If you need help getting the best mortgage use our resources.
First, adopt this goal: Cut the cost of your mortgage and pay it off early
Next, watch this video: Getting through the mortgage maze
Then, why not have a wander over to Q&A and ask other lovemoney.com members for hints and tips about what worked best for them?
At lovemoney.com, you can research all the best deals yourself using our online mortgage service, or speak directly to a whole-of-market, fee-free lovemoney.com broker. Call 0800 804 4045 or email mortgages@lovemoney.com for more help.
More: Find a magnificent mortgage | Boost your property's value by £20,000 | The worst is yet to come for homeowners
Most Recent
Comments
-
Provided you buy a reasonably priced house for its type & Area & there is NO unusual 'mark up' for white Goods [Flats are particularly prone to this phenomena] purchase remains a good bet versus renting. Of course Interest rates need watching as does differentials beteen Mutuals & Banks. Again if you have money in the bank earning near nothing then it could just as wel finance a house. Buying keen, Bargaining, not giving 'Asking Prices' are all important. Resist spending large amounts on your house, move up to somewhere with a conservatory if you want one. [Let the Vendor Pay!!] Remember the profits from house sales are Tax free [At Present]
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
If people can't afford to buy at current prices, whatever year we're talking about, they should not buy. If they're offered more mortgage than they can genuinely afford, they are idiots for accepting the offer and deserve to be in negative equity when there is a downturn. It's called *personal responsibility*. stu531: firstly, it's been shown time and again that BTLs landlords are *not* responsible for pricing first-time buyers out of the market. And even if they were, what's the problem? If a FTB can't afford to buy a house in competition with someone with more capital, that's just tough luck and they need to save harder. We live in a market economy, not a socialist one. There's no shame in renting and it's much cheaper than owning, so it's the logical route to take for most people on modest incomes. The UK already has amongst the highest rate of home ownership in major western economies, so it's probably a good thing that more people learn to rent rather than own: better affordability, better labour mobility, better quality as there is greater regulation and more money is being invested in property maintenance by landlords than FTBs can afford, and so on.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
eLJay, if you listen to enough people, over the course your life you will be told 'you must buy' a car, a plasma TV, a pension, a timeshare, an endowment mortgage, gold, shares, government bonds, corporate bonds, BTL, 1,000 self help books, 100,000 make-a-million-overnight guides and every other investment and opportunity under the sun. It's up to you to make your own decision. I bought a property in August 2006 for over six and a half times my salary, with a mortgage of five and half times my salary. The mortgage was still lower than renting a smaller place, and the property is now worth £50,000 more than I paid for it even after the recent correction (falls of up to 20% are a correction, not a crash). And I've now moved out of the country, at which point rented it out for one and a half times the cost of the mortgage. Now, with rates having fallen, it's rented for seven times the cost of the mortgage. As with any investment or major purchase, it's all about doing your homework and taking responsibility for your actions. "Mortgage companies should never have been allowed to break the 3 times your wages rules that were in place to stop runaway property prices" That rule was never in place to stop runaway house prices. Any salary multiples were there so mortgage companies could reduce their risk, but not lending people more than they could afford. With interest rates over the past decade being around half of their average over the previous three decades, it's only natural that banks increase the salary multiples to make more money. Never forget that banks in a free market exist to make a profit, not to fulfil anyone's political or social agenda. If you want it to be different, come live in Russia, where mortgage rates are 20%, the savings rate is 7%, and the inflation rate is 15%.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
17 December 2009