Government loses appeal on solar feed-in tariffs
Court of Appeal rules that High Court rejection of December cut-off date should stand.
The Government has lost its appeal to overturn a High Court ruling on changes it wanted to make on solar power feed-in tariffs (FiTs).
It had proposed cutting the amount homeowners could receive from selling their excess electricity to the National Grid from 43.3p per kilowatt hour (p/kWh) to 21p p/kWH on any installations approved after 12th December.
This was challenged by Friends of the Earth and two solar installation firms, who argued that the deadline was actually earlier than the end of a consultation period into the changes. That ended on 23rd December.
The High Court ruled in their favour, saying the Government’s proposal was “unlawful”.
However, the Government has now sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.
In a written statement, Chris Huhne, Energy and Climate Change Secretary, said: "We respectfully disagree with the judgment and are seeking permission to appeal to the Supreme Court. In the light of that, we cannot rule out the possibility that lower tariffs could be applied to installations which became eligible for FITs on or after the proposed reference date."
So if the Government wins its legal challenge, it will reimpose the original cut-off date of 12th December.
Last week, it proposed an alternative date of the 3rd March in the event that it lost its legal challenge.
The high take-up for the scheme and the falling cost of solar photovoltaic panels led to the Government introducing a deadline for installation.
The Government will announce the outcome of the consultation on the scheme on the 9th February, with any changes to be made law by 1st April. There will then be another consultation.
More: Free solar panels: The small print exposed | Gas and electricity price 'reductions' are phoney!
For the latest news and comment on the stories that affect your money, follow us on Twitter
Most Recent
Comments
-
If you rented your house from the council you had the chance to buy it. A generalisation is perfectly valid unless you say 'all'. Current pensioners have some of the highest average disposable incomes. My family are all in or from working class professions, my former in-laws came from Poland with nothing and within 20 years owned their own house. There are no excuses for those who drank and chain smoked and were generally feckless with their finances. It is perfectly feasible to live on the state pension, my mother managed with no problem whatsoever.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
@electricblue Your generalisation about current pensioners is startling. You only have a good pension if you had a well-paid job. Lower paid workers just about subsisted, let alone saved or built up a pension. If you rented your house from the council, growth in property value did you no good. Just paying your own way and paying your stamp without relying on benefits can be an achievement. Now trying to manage on a state pension of £102 a week. Thank goodness for Lidl and charity shops. Let's not hear about "no excuses". please.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Huhne has to go surely - and will soon when his speeding case is heard.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
26 January 2012