The Budgets the political parties wanted to give

It was compromise for the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, but here's what the three parties would have done alone.

The political parties have been setting out their alternative budgets following the Coalition Government’s Budget yesterday.

Here’s what the parties would have done if they had been in sole power.

Conservatives

George Osborne said he would have gone further in raising the tax-free personal allowance on Income Tax, possibly to £12,500 from 2016/17 although he didn't quote figures. He also would have raised the higher rate (40%) tax threshold further.

And given the Conservatives have stated they would the annual benefits cap reduced from £26,000 to £23,000 “within days” of forming a new government, it’s arguably fair to say this would have been included in a solely Tory Budget.

The £12 billion of welfare cuts announced in the Budget would be detailed in a Spending Review after the election, the Tories have said.

The elephant in the chamber yesterday was arguably Inheritance Tax, as it’s well known that the Tories want to raise the threshold from £325,000 to £1 million. There was talk that there might have been a measure to remove the tax from properties up to £1 million and reduce it on properties worth up to £2 million, but that was likely vetoed by the Liberal Democrats.

Keep on top of your own budget with lovemoney's free, secure Track app

Labour

In a round of media interviews the morning after the Budget, Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls said he wouldn’t reverse any of the new measures announced in the Budget.

However, he did say he would “reverse… deeper spending cuts in the next three years”. Instead, Labour would introduce a mixture of spending cuts, of which there are no precise details yet, and tax rises for the better off.

Those tax rises include the additional (45%) Income Tax rate increasing back to 50%, and a so-called ‘Mansion Tax’ on properties valued at over £2 million.

The Minimum Wage would be increased to £8 an hour. The under-occupancy tax, better known as the ‘bedroom tax’, would be scrapped, as would the Married Couples’ Tax Allowance, and the tuition fee cap would be lowered from £9,000 to £6,000.

It would also force energy companies to freeze gas and electricity bills until 2017.

Liberal Democrats

In a piece of slightly bizarre political theatre, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander unveiled an alternative Budget in Parliament and even posed with a yellow version of the Budget box beforehand.

The Lib Dem plan to balance the books by 2017/18 is based on securing an additional £6 billion from tax avoiders, with £6 billion coming from tax rises. The latter would include a ‘mansion tax’ and a tax on bankers’ bonuses.

There would be also be £12 billion of government department savings and £3.5 billion off the welfare bill, compared to the £12 billion off the latter announced by the Coalition Government in the real Budget.

Keep on top of your own budget with lovemoney's free, secure Track app

More on Budget 2015:

The Budget 2015: key points

The Budget 2015: winners and losers

Budget 2015: what the Chancellor didn’t say

Comments


Be the first to comment

Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature

Copyright © lovemoney.com All rights reserved.

 

loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with Firm Reference Number (FRN): 479153.

loveMONEY.com is a company registered in England & Wales (Company Number: 7406028) with its registered address at First Floor Ridgeland House, 15 Carfax, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1DY, United Kingdom. loveMONEY.com Limited operates under the trading name of loveMONEY.com Financial Services Limited. We operate as a credit broker for consumer credit and do not lend directly. Our company maintains relationships with various affiliates and lenders, which we may promote within our editorial content in emails and on featured partner pages through affiliate links. Please note, that we may receive commission payments from some of the product and service providers featured on our website. In line with Consumer Duty regulations, we assess our partners to ensure they offer fair value, are transparent, and cater to the needs of all customers, including vulnerable groups. We continuously review our practices to ensure compliance with these standards. While we make every effort to ensure the accuracy and currency of our editorial content, users should independently verify information with their chosen product or service provider. This can be done by reviewing the product landing page information and the terms and conditions associated with the product. If you are uncertain whether a product is suitable, we strongly recommend seeking advice from a regulated independent financial advisor before applying for the products.