'Debt collectors are wrongly targeting me: what can I do'

A reader is being targeted by debt collectors looking for the previous owner of her home which she bought last summer. Paula Higgins from Homeowners Alliance speaks to a bailiff lawyer for some advice.
Since I bought my house last summer I have had a problem with companies, debt collectors and bailiffs looking for the previous owner. It's been really stressful, infuriating and at times quite scary, and there is very little information out there about what to do when it's not your debt.
I have tried everything I can think of to stop the problem but it has had little effect. My main concern is that it seems that for some types of debts the bailiffs will have right to enter the property to remove goods with a locksmith – including for some of the debts he has. If I am here to speak to them directly I can stop them, but if I am not in or away, they could do just that.
In my exasperation, I have even asked Twitter for advice and got loads of responses from people who have had it happen to them so clearly it’s not that uncommon a problem.
Help from the loveMONEY Expert Panel
Paula Higgins, chief executive of the Homeowners Alliance (pictured right) seeks further advice on the reader's situation.
I’m sorry to hear about the trouble you’re having and I can understand why you’re feeling exasperated.
I spoke with John Kruse, an expert in bailiff law about your situation.
As you are probably aware, debt collection agencies have no legal powers other than to write and (very rarely) to send a door to door collector.
John suggests sending them a copy of the new Council Tax bill and/or details of the sale and that really ought to deal with the problem. The debt collection agencies have no legal power of entry at all.
Regarding bailiffs’ rights of entry, and despite whatever notices from the bailiff may say, there is no right to force initial entry and no right to enter a third party's premises except with a court order (at the hearing of which the bailiffs would have to convince the court that there was evidence that the debtor had left goods behind in new resident’s home).
Such an application is very unlikely because it will cost the bailiffs money up front and I can't imagine that they would ever risk it.
Again, in all cases, providing the bailiff company or the original creditor with details of the change of owner ought to be enough to sort the problem out.
It’s advisable to put this in writing to the company/creditor with supporting documents. Just telling the bailiff on the doorstep is almost always less successful – and more stressful!
Compare fixed and tracker mortgages with loveMONEY
If you have a financial question or issue you’d like us to solve, please do get in touch. It needn’t be about investing: whether it’s an energy bill or banking complaint that needs sorting, our team will do their best to help out.
The views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of loveMONEY.
Most Recent
Comments
-
If I understand correctly. The solicitors were given the correct address for the debtor by their client yet they pursue a person at a different address because they seem to link the address with the debtor in spite of their client's instructions. The instruction basically is "Prusue Mr./Mrs. X at address Y for £Z" If they are not using address Y then they are very likely not carrying out their client's instructions. Suggest you do the 1(one) polite letter and if that does not work, complain to the Solicitor's Regulation Authority and threaten legal action. Not the Law Society - they represent solicitors.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
What is the situation when a debt recovery solicitors has your address linked to someone unknown, that has never lived at your address. They were even supplied the CORRECT address for this debtor by the company they were acting for. Can you demand to know where they got your address from, linking it to someone unknown.
REPORT This comment has been reported. -
Yes it's a sign of the times. On occasions where I or my family have been targeted (about 3 times now) I have sent them 1 (one) polite letter explaining the circumstances. If they persist is sending demands, the second letter is a "desist or else" letter threatening legal action against them. I would NOT send them any documentation that Identifies you. That sort of document can get used for ID fraud. I'm surprised a lawyer (I assume he is a lawyer) suggested it. I have never had to resort to carry out my threat but you should be prepared to do so on any old basis you like. The very fact that they could be in court is usually enough to deter them. They really don't care if whomever pays them owes the money or not . Don't bother with plod - not their business unless the "collectors" threaten violence of any sort.
REPORT This comment has been reported.
Do you want to comment on this article? You need to be signed in for this feature
07 March 2018